The Effectiveness of Couple Therapy and Relationship Support (ECoT)

May 19, 2026 updated by: Petra Nyman-Salonen, University of Helsinki

The Effectiveness of Couple Therapy and Relationship Support: a Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized and controlled study investigates the effectiveness of relationship counselling and couple therapy in improving couples' relationship satisfaction and overall well-being. It compares four intervention groups both with each other and with a waitlist control group. The groups are:

  1. HUS Self-Help (Mielenterveystalo.fi): Participants independently complete online self-help tasks based on couple therapy, developed by Helsinki University Hospital (HUS) Psychiatry and Väestöliitto.
  2. Peloton Parisuhde (eng. Fearless Relationship) Online Course: Based on Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy (EFCT), this course by EFCT trainers Eklund-Mikola & Pinomaa uses online lectures and exercises to help couples identify negative interaction patterns and strengthen their emotional connection.
  3. Short Manualized Emotionally Focused Couple Intervention: Five face-to-face sessions with a couple therapist.
  4. Face-to-Face Couple Therapy (Treatment As Usual): 1 to 10 sessions, with the therapeutic approach varying depending on the therapist's training.

The study is conducted at the Relationship Counselling Unit of the City of Helsinki's Social Services in Finland, which provides counselling and family guidance under Section 26 of the Social Welfare Act to couples with children living in Helsinki. A total of 200 couples from the unit's treatment queue will be invited to participate and randomly assigned to one of the interventions or the control group, with 40 couples in each group.

Participants will complete questionnaires at the beginning and end of the service, and at a 4-month follow-up. The questionnaires measure relationship satisfaction and well-being, among other things. The study also examines how individual, couple-level, and treatment-related background factors influence and mediate the effectiveness of the interventions.

In addition to the questionnaires, registry data, therapist assessments, and ongoing treatment feedback collected within the unit is utilized. The results will provide new scientific insights into the effectiveness of short interventions and their suitable target groups and can be used to develop relationship counselling work both within the unit and nationally.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Helsinki, Finland
        • Relationship Counselling

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Parents (couple) and blended families, and at least one of the parents is resident of Helsinki
  • Couples expecting their first child. The couple is experiencing one or more of the following (1) severe relationship conflict, (2) a serious threat of separation, (3) significant challenges in forming a family or navigating a blended family relationship.
  • couples eligible for treatment at the couple counselling faculty of Helsinki

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inadequate Finnish written language skills (the questionnaires are only available in Finnish)
  • if both spouses do not complete the baseline questionnaires within the given deadline.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HUS Self-help for Couples
Self-Help Program for Couples (Mielenterveystalo.fi) developed by HUS, this online self-help program provides couples with psychoeducational content and practical exercises designed to enhance relationship well-being. Partners can complete the tasks together or individually. The materials aim to strengthen emotional connection and improve communication.
Experimental: Peloton Parisuhde (eng Fearless Relationship) Online Course
Based on Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy, this course by Eira Eklund-Mikola and Hanna Pinomaa uses online lectures and exercises to help couples identify negative interaction patterns and strengthen their emotional connection.
Experimental: Manualized Short-Term EFT-Based Couple Intervention
Manualized Short-Term EFT-Based Couple Intervention is a structured program consisting of five face-to-face sessions with a trained couple therapist. Based on Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT), the intervention helps partners explore emotional patterns, improve communication, and strengthen their bond through guided therapeutic exercises.
Experimental: Standard Face-to-Face Couple Therapy (Treatment as Usual)
This intervention consists of 1 to 10 in-person sessions with a couple therapist. The therapeutic approach varies depending on the therapist's professional background and training. It reflects typical clinical practice and is not standardized, allowing for flexibility in addressing the couple's specific needs.
No Intervention: Waitlist (control group)
Participants in this group do not receive any intervention during the initial two-month study period. After the waiting period, they are offered Treatment as Usual. This group serves as a comparison to assess the effectiveness of the active treatments.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relationship Satisfaction (Dyadic Adjustment Scale)
Time Frame: Measured at enrollment before randomization, after treatment (or waitlist condition) and at a 4 months followup.
The Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) is a self-report questionnaire assessing relationship satisfaction and adjustment between romantic partners. The scale measures consensus, satisfaction, cohesion, and affectional expression. Total scores range from 0 to 151, with higher scores indicating better relationship adjustment and satisfaction.
Measured at enrollment before randomization, after treatment (or waitlist condition) and at a 4 months followup.
Depression severity (Patient Health Questionnaire-9)
Time Frame: Measured at enrollment before randomization, after treatment (or waitlist condition) and at a 4 months followup.
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a validated self-report measure assessing the severity of depressive symptoms over the past two weeks. Total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.
Measured at enrollment before randomization, after treatment (or waitlist condition) and at a 4 months followup.
Anxiety Severity (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7)
Time Frame: Measured at enrollment before randomization, after treatment (or waitlist condition) and at a 4 months followup.
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) is a validated self-report measure assessing the severity of generalized anxiety symptoms over the past two weeks. Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety symptoms.
Measured at enrollment before randomization, after treatment (or waitlist condition) and at a 4 months followup.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adult Attachment (Experiences in Close Relationships - Revised
Time Frame: Measured at enrollment before randomization, after treatment (or waitlist condition) and at a 4 months followup.
The Experiences in Close Relationships - Revised (ECR-R) is a widely used self-report questionnaire that assesses adult attachment styles in romantic relationships. The instrument measures two dimensions: attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance, reflecting how individuals experience closeness, trust, and emotional connection with their partner. Scores on each subscale typically range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater attachment anxiety or greater attachment avoidance.
Measured at enrollment before randomization, after treatment (or waitlist condition) and at a 4 months followup.
Reflective Functioning (Reflective Functioning Questionnaire)
Time Frame: Measured at enrollment before randomization, after treatment (or waitlist condition) and at a 4 months followup.
The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire - RFQ-8 is a brief self-report measure developed by Fonagy and colleagues to assess reflective functioning, or mentalizing-the ability to understand one's own and others' thoughts, feelings, and intentions. In couple research, it helps evaluate how well partners can interpret each other's behavior in emotionally meaningful ways, which is essential for healthy communication and emotional connection.
Measured at enrollment before randomization, after treatment (or waitlist condition) and at a 4 months followup.
Communication Patterns (Communication Patterns Questionnaire)
Time Frame: Masured at enrollment before randomization, after treatment (or waitlist condition) and at a 4 months followup
Communication Patterns Questionnaire - Short Form (CPQ-SF) Developed by Christensen and Sullaway, the CPQ-SF is a self-report measure that assesses how couples communicate during conflict. It focuses on typical interaction styles-such as constructive communication, avoidance, and demand-withdraw patterns-providing insight into how partners argue and resolve disagreements in their relationship.
Masured at enrollment before randomization, after treatment (or waitlist condition) and at a 4 months followup

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 11, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data cannot be shared due to strict confidentiality and data protection regulations. These data contain sensitive health-related information and personal identifiers, and sharing them could compromise participants' privacy. All data are handled in accordance with ethical guidelines and legal standards to ensure the protection of participants' rights and well-being.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Adult

Clinical Trials on Self-Help Program for Couples

Subscribe