Muévete conCiencia: Exercise and Mind-Body Program for First-Year University Students

February 24, 2026 updated by: Montserrat Rodríguez Vera, Universidad San Sebastián

Muévete conCiencia Project: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial of Physical Exercise and Mind-Body Interventions in University Students

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether different physical exercise and mind-body interventions can improve executive functions and reduce stress in first-year university students.

The study focuses on healthy undergraduate students, men and women, aged approximately 18-25 years, enrolled in the first year of health-related programs at a Chilean university.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Do high-intensity dual-task physical exercise interventions improve executive functions (working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility) and reduce stress in university students? Do mind-body exercise interventions (Tai Chi) reduce stress levels, measured through self-report and psychobiological biomarkers (cortisol)? Are there differential effects between high-intensity dual-task exercise, low-to-moderate intensity mind-body exercise, and cognitive stimulation on executive functioning and stress-related outcomes?

Researchers will compare:

  • high-intensity dual-task exercise group,
  • low-to-moderate intensity mind-body exercise group (Tai Chi), and
  • cognitive stimulation control group,

To determine whether physically integrated motor-cognitive training produces greater improvements in executive functions and stress biomarkers than mind-body exercise or cognitive stimulation alone.

Participants will:

Complete baseline pre-intervention and post-intervention assessments, Neuropsychological tests of executive functions (working memory, inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility), Self-reported academic stress questionnaires, Psychobiological measures of stress (hair cortisol, salivary cortisol), Physical activity, anthropometric, and sociodemographic assessments.

Participate for 12 weeks (22 sessions, twice per week) in one of the following interventions:

High-intensity dual-task physical exercise, combining aerobic, strength, and motor-cognitive tasks; Low-to-moderate intensity mind-body exercise (Tai Chi) emphasizing mindful movement, balance, breathing, and attentional control; Cognitive stimulation sessions using a structured digital cognitive training program.

All sessions will be conducted in supervised, controlled settings by trained professionals, following standardized protocols to ensure safety, consistency, and adherence.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Muévete conCiencia is a single-center, three-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate and compare the effects of three structured programs-(1) moderate-to-vigorous intensity motor-cognitive dual-task exercise, (2) low-to-moderate intensity Tai Chi as a mind-body intervention, and (3) supervised digital cognitive stimulation-on executive functioning and stress-related outcomes in first-year university students.

Rationale and background Transitioning into higher education is a developmental period characterized by increased academic demands, changes in routines, and new social and environmental stressors. Elevated and persistent stress during this stage has been associated with poorer well-being and may negatively impact cognitive performance, particularly executive functions (EF). EF-including working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility-are higher-order cognitive processes crucial for academic performance, self-regulated learning, and problem solving. Because EF continue developing into early adulthood, the university context provides an opportunity for preventive and promotive interventions aimed at strengthening cognitive resources that support academic adaptation.

Physical activity has been associated with cognitive and mental-health benefits in university populations, including improvements in attention and EF and reductions in stress-related symptoms. Evidence indicates that cognitive outcomes may depend not only on exercise intensity but also on the cognitive demands embedded in the activity. Motor-cognitive dual-task training explicitly combines physical and cognitive loads (e.g., working memory, inhibitory control, and set shifting) and may produce larger EF gains than exercise alone by increasing executive control requirements during movement. In parallel, mind-body practices such as Tai Chi integrate mindful attention, controlled breathing, and coordinated movement and have been linked to improved psychological well-being and stress regulation. A third approach, digital cognitive stimulation, uses structured adaptive tasks to target executive components directly and can be delivered in a scalable and standardized format. However, there is limited experimental evidence comparing these modalities head-to-head within the same randomized design, particularly in Latin American university settings.

Stress is assessed using both self-report and a physiological biomarker. Cortisol is a key end-product of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity and exhibits a circadian rhythm, making it a relevant biomarker for stress-related physiological regulation. Salivary sampling provides a non-invasive approach suitable for educational settings. Integrating psychological and physiological measures can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of intervention effects and potential mechanisms.

Design and setting The study uses a three-arm randomized controlled design with pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention assessments. The trial is conducted at Universidad San Sebastián (Concepción campus, Chile) and targets first-year students from health-related academic programs. Participants are recruited during the university induction period and enrolled after completing baseline assessments. Given the nature of behavioral interventions, participants and instructors are not blinded; however, outcome assessors are trained and remain blinded to group allocation, and procedures are standardized to reduce performance and measurement bias.

Intervention Participants are allocated to one of three 12-week programs delivered in small groups, with two sessions per week (24 sessions total). Each program is supervised by trained professionals and delivered in an on-campus setting. Sessions follow a standardized structure that includes preparation/warm-up, a main training component, and a closing/cool-down or debriefing period, adapted to the characteristics of each modality.

Motor-cognitive dual-task exercise (moderate-to-vigorous intensity): sessions combine aerobic/functional exercises with concurrent cognitive demands targeting core executive components (e.g., working memory updating, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility), implemented through standardized verbal instructions and visual stimuli. Effort is monitored using perceived exertion and heart rate checks, with planned progression across weeks to maintain an appropriate training stimulus.

Tai Chi (low-to-moderate intensity mind-body intervention): sessions emphasize postural alignment, slow coordinated sequences, weight shifting, and breath-movement synchronization, with an explicit focus on mindful attention and motor sequence learning. Intensity is maintained within low-to-moderate ranges and progressed gradually by increasing sequence complexity and practice continuity.

Digital cognitive stimulation: sessions involve supervised use of a digital platform for structured graphomotor and cognitive tasks designed to engage sustained/selective attention, working memory, planning, and other executive processes. Task difficulty is adjusted to participant performance to ensure a progressive cognitive load and to promote adherence and standardized delivery.

Assessment schedule and procedures Assessments are conducted at baseline and after completion of the 12-week program using standardized procedures and consistent testing order. The cognitive assessment battery is administered by trained evaluators and includes measures aligned with the three-component model of executive functions (working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility). Stress is assessed using a validated academic stress self-report scale and salivary cortisol measurement. Physical fitness and health-related indicators are collected to characterize participants and to examine whether changes in physical condition co-occur with cognitive and stress outcomes. Attendance is recorded at every session to quantify adherence.

For salivary cortisol, samples are collected in a controlled laboratory setting using passive drool procedures. Participants receive standardized pre-collection instructions (e.g., avoiding food and beverages other than water, tobacco, and oral hygiene for a specified period before sampling) to minimize pre-analytical variability. Samples are processed following laboratory protocols (e.g., centrifugation and appropriate storage conditions) and analyzed using enzyme immunoassay methods according to manufacturer specifications. Collection times are standardized to reduce circadian-related variability.

Data quality, adherence, and safety monitoring Intervention fidelity is supported through standardized session plans, trained instructors, and systematic recording of session attendance. To promote retention and minimize missed sessions, the study uses flexible scheduling options and structured reminders. Any adverse events or discomfort reported during sessions or assessments are documented and managed according to institutional procedures, with referral to appropriate services if needed.

Planned analysis approach (overview) Analyses will follow a pre-post framework to estimate within-group change and between-group differences over time. Group-by-time effects will be tested using repeated-measures models, with appropriate post-hoc comparisons when significant interactions are identified. Standard data checks (distributional assumptions and homoscedasticity) will be performed. Missing data will be addressed using principled methods (e.g., multiple imputation) consistent with recommendations for clinical trials. Effect sizes will be reported to support interpretation of clinical and practical relevance.

Expected contribution This trial aims to generate comparative evidence on three feasible intervention strategies for first-year university students by integrating cognitive, psychological, physiological, and physical assessments. Findings may inform scalable health-promotion and academic-adaptation programs in higher education contexts, particularly in Chile and other Latin American settings where experimental longitudinal evidence remains limited.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Región del Biobío
      • Concepción, Región del Biobío, Chile, 4030375
        • Universidad San Sebastián

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrolled in the first year of a health-related undergraduate program at Universidad San Sebastián, Concepción campus (Chile), academic cohort 2026.
  • Willing and able to attend scheduled intervention sessions and complete baseline and post-intervention assessments.
  • Provides written informed consent prior to participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of neurological disease or severe psychiatric disorder that may interfere with participation or outcome validity.
  • Medical or musculoskeletal condition that contraindicates participation in moderate-to-vigorous physical exercise.
  • Regular participation in another structured exercise program during the study period or being a competitive athlete.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Motor-Cognitive Dual-Task Exercise
Sessions are conducted twice per week and combine moderate-to-vigorous physical exercise with concurrent cognitive demands targeting executive functions such as working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility. Exercise intensity is progressively increased and monitored using perceived exertion and heart rate checks. Each session includes a warm-up, a main dual-task training phase, and a cool-down period.
sessions include warm-up, circuit-based functional training integrating simultaneous motor and cognitive tasks (e.g., working memory, inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility), and cool-down. Exercise intensity is moderate to vigorous (≈64-89% HRmax), monitored using heart-rate monitoring and Borg's perceived exertion scale, with progressive overload across weeks.
Experimental: Tai Chi Mind-Body Exercise
The intervention consists of low-to-moderate intensity practice emphasizing slow, coordinated movements, postural control, weight shifting, breathing regulation, and mindful attention. Sessions follow a structured format including preparation, practice of progressive Tai Chi sequences, and a closing phase focused on relaxation and integration.
Tai Chi program based on a simplified Yang-style sequence. Sessions emphasize slow coordinated movements, balance, breathing, and mindful attention. Exercise intensity is low to moderate (≈55-70% HRmax), with progressive learning of movement sequences and focus on physiological and emotional
Active Comparator: Cognitive Stimulation (CS)
The intervention uses a computerized platform to deliver structured and adaptive graphomotor and cognitive tasks targeting executive functions, including attention, working memory, planning, and cognitive flexibility. Sessions are conducted in person under professional supervision and include task familiarization, progressive cognitive training, and feedback.
Cognitive training program using digital graphomotor tasks delivered via specialized software. Sessions target executive functions (attention, working memory, planning, inhibitory control) through adaptive tasks with immediate feedback and individualized difficulty adjustment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Working memory
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention (post-intervention).
Working memory will be assessed using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) Digit Span subtest (total raw score). Scores range from 0 to 48. Higher scores indicate better working memory performance.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention (post-intervention).
Inhibitory Control
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention (post-intervention).
Inhibitory control will be assessed using the Stroop Color and Word Test. Performance will be recorded as the number of correctly completed items within the standard time limit. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better inhibitory control.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention (post-intervention).
Cognitive Flexibility
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention (post-intervention)
Trail Making Test Parts A and B (TMT) using normative data for the Latin American Spanish-speaking adult population. The TMT assesses the ability to alternate between mental sets and manage divided attention demands. The score is the completion time for each part of the TMT-A (Minimum = 0; maximum = 100) and TMT-B (Minimum = 0; maximum = 300). Lower completion time indicates better performance.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention (post-intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physiological Stress Salivary Cortisol
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention (post-intervention).
Salivary cortisol levels reflect physiological stress associated with hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity. Changes in physiological stress in response to the interventions will be assessed non-invasively through salivary cortisol determination using a competitive ELISA assay. Cortisol concentrations will be expressed in µg/dL. The analytical measurement range of the assay is approximately 0.012-3.0 µg/dL. Higher values indicate greater physiological stress.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention (post-intervention).
Depression, anxiety, and Stress symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention (post-intervention).
Symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress will be assessed using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21). The scale consists of 21 items rated on a Likert scale from 0 ("did not apply to me at all") to 5 ("applied to me very much or most of the time"), reflecting the extent to which each statement describes the participant's experiences over the previous week (Minimum = 0; maximum = 126). Higher scores indicate more global symptoms. The DASS-21 is a brief self-report measure with well-established psychometric properties in university student populations.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention (post-intervention).
Academic stress
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention (post-intervention).
Academic Stress Scale (Barraza-Macías) - 33-item self-report instrument assessing academic stressors, coping strategies, and stress-related physical, psychological, and behavioral reactions. the total score range Minimum = 33; maximum = 165. Higher scores indicate more global symptoms.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention (post-intervention).
Physical Activity
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention (post-intervention).
Physical activity will be assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF). Physical activity will be expressed as MET-minutes per week depending on reported activity. Higher scores indicate higher levels of physical activity.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention (post-intervention).
Muscle Strength
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention (post-intervention).
Muscle strength will be measured using handgrip dynamometry. Three trials will be performed for each hand, and the highest value will be recorded in kilograms-force (kg/f). Higher values indicate greater muscle strength.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention (post-intervention).
Body Weight
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention (post-intervention).
Body weight will be assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis and expressed in kilograms (kg). Higher values indicate greater body weight.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention (post-intervention).
Height
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention (post-intervention).
Height will be measured in meters (m) using a standardized stadiometer or wall-mounted measuring tape, with participants standing upright without shoes. Higher values indicate greater height.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention (post-intervention).
Body Fat Percentage
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention (post-intervention).
Body fat percentage will be assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis and expressed as percentage of total body mass (%). Higher values indicate greater adiposity and poorer body composition.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after completion of the 12-week intervention (post-intervention).

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intervention adherence
Time Frame: Throughout the 12-week intervention period
Intervention adherence will be assessed by recording attendance at the scheduled intervention sessions. A participation rate will be calculated as the percentage of attended sessions relative to the total number of planned sessions (attendance/24 sessions × 100). Higher percentages indicate greater adherence to the intervention.
Throughout the 12-week intervention period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 5725
  • 11251478 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ANID), Chile)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results reported in the primary publications of this study will be made available. The shared IPD will include demographic variables, outcome measures, and relevant covariates used in the statistical analyses, along with a corresponding data dictionary. Data that could compromise participant privacy or confidentiality will not be shared.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

IPD and supporting documentation will be made available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary study results and will remain available for a period of 5 years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to the de-identified IPD and supporting documents will be granted to qualified researchers who submit a reasonable research proposal. Requests will be reviewed by the principal investigator and the research team. Data will be shared for non-commercial research purposes only, and access will require the signing of a data use agreement to ensure appropriate use and protection of the data.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Motor-Cognitive Dual-Task Exercise (DT)

Subscribe