- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07609368
Teaching Kitchens Intervention for Older Adults in a Senior Center in New England
May 19, 2026 updated by: Tufts University
A Pilot Teaching Kitchens Intervention Protocol to Improve the Dietary Quality of Congregate Meals for Older Adults
This study will evaluate a culinary nutrition intervention designed to improve the quality of meals served to older adults participating in a senior center.
Many meals currently provided in these settings do not meet recommended dietary guidelines, which negatively impact health outcomes among older adults.
In this pilot study, participants will receive improved lunch meals that are designed to be more nutritious, culturally appropriate, and acceptable, along with nutrition education sessions over a 6-month period.
This intervention will also include training for food service staff to support implementation of the improved meals.
The study will assess changes in dietary quality, physical health measures, and social and behavioral outcomes among participants at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.
Findings from this study will help determine the feasibility and effectiveness of this approach and inform future efforts to improve nutrition and health outcomes in Congregate Meal Program for older adults.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Detailed Description
Congregate meal programs within senior centers serve a large population of older adults in the United States, yet many meals provided in these settings do not meet recommended dietary guidelines particularly for whole grains, micronutrients, sodium, and saturated fat.
Poor dietary quality in this population may contribute to increased risk of chronic diseases, reduced physical function, and lower overall well-being.
This study is a Phase III pilot feasibility study designed to evaluate a culinary nutrition intervention implemented in a senior meal center serving older adults.
The intervention is based on a Teaching Kitchens model and includes three core components: (1) development and implementation of a nutritionally improved lunch menu, (2) training of food service staff to prepare healthier and culturally appropriate meals, and (3) delivery of nutrition education sessions to meal recipients.
The intervention will be conducted over a 6-month period.
Participants will receive reformulated lunch meals designed to improve dietary quality, alongside structured nutrition education sessions aimed at increasing nutritional literacy, supporting healthy food choices, and promoting engagement in the meal program.
The effectiveness of the intervention will be evaluated by measuring changes in dietary quality, physical health indicators, and psychosocial outcomes at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.
Outcomes will include dietary intake, anthropometric measures (e.g., body weight, hip-to-waist circumference, height), blood pressure, food security, and measures of social engagement and well-being.
This study aims to assess the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a scalable culinary nutrition intervention tailored to older adults in Congregate meal settings.
Findings from this pilot study will inform the development of larger-scale interventions and may contribute to improving nutrition and health outcomes for older adults in similar programs.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
30
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Andres V Ardisson Korat, ScD
- Phone Number: 617-556-3386
- Email: andres.ardisson_korat@tufts.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Meghan Hendricksen, Ph.D
- Phone Number: 617-556-3384
- Email: meghan.hendricksen@tufts.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Connecticut
-
Glastonbury, Connecticut, United States, 06033
- Glastonbury Senior Center
-
Contact:
- Ronda Guberman, Senior Center Supervisor
- Phone Number: 860-652-7646
- Email: ronda.guberman@glastonbury-ct.gov
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
The participants for this study are senior center members either of the current lunch program or other programming events at "The Senior Center" in Glastonbury, Connecticut.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 50 years or older
- Regularly visits the Senior Center either for lunch meals or other center-based programming
- Willing and able to participate in a 6-month intervention, which includes consistent involvement in the lunch program
- Willing and able to participate in multiple focus group discussions centered around meal preferences, health perceptions, and dietary habits (full study participation is 7 months)
- Capable of providing informed consent and completing an eligibility screening
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of moderate to severe neurological condition(s) that may impact cognitive ability (e.g., dementia, major stroke)
- Known severe food allergies that may interfere with participation. (with study MD approval, participants with mild allergies or intolerances may be included and notified not to consume any known allergens)
- Recent changes in health status that affect the ability to assess foods (e.g., altered appetite, smell, vision, hearing, and/or taste)
- Any disorder, unwillingness, or inability, not covered by any of the other exclusion criteria, which, in either the investigator's or study MD's opinion, might jeopardize the subject's compliance with the protocol. This includes impaired vision requiring assistance or aid from another person, impaired smell, or impaired taste perception. Given the number of written surveys and visual support materials, the study would place a large burden on participation for individuals with visual impairment requiring assistance.
- Individuals who have a cognitive, sensory, or physical impairment that prevents them from understanding the consent information or completing the required consent documentation will be excluded from participation.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
Senior Center Meal Recipients
Adults aged 50+ who regularly attend The Senior Center in Glastonbury, CT and participate in the 6-month culinary nutrition intervention, including redesigned lunch meals, nutrition education sessions, focus groups, and dietary/health assessments.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean change from baseline to 6 months in dietary quality among meal recipients
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
|
The mean change from baseline to 6 months in dietary quality among meal recipients will be measured using the healthy eating index (HEI) and individual components of the HEI.
|
Baseline to 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Satisfaction in meal program from baseline to 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
|
The satisfaction in meal program will be measured using the meal program satisfaction questionnaire from baseline to 6 months.
|
Baseline to 6 months
|
|
Mean meal consumption scores from baseline to 6 months
Time Frame: Weeks 3 and 7 of meal implementation
|
The mean meal consumption scores will be measured through visual assessment of food discarded during weeks 3 and 7 using the official plate waste analysis guide.
|
Weeks 3 and 7 of meal implementation
|
|
Mean change in nutrition literacy from baseline to 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
|
The mean change in nutrition literacy will be assessed using a nutritional literacy survey for older adults from baseline to 6 months.
|
Baseline to 6 months
|
|
Mean change in blood pressure from baseline to 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
|
The mean change in blood pressure (systolic/diastolic) will be assessed using an automated sphygmomanometer.
|
Baseline to 6 months
|
|
Mean change in body weight from baseline to 6 months
Time Frame: baseline to 6 months
|
The mean change in body weight will be assessed using a digital scale from baseline to 6 months.
|
baseline to 6 months
|
|
Mean change in waist circumference from baseline to 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
|
The mean change in waist circumference using a tape measure will be assessed from baseline to 6 months.
|
Baseline to 6 months
|
|
Mean change in hip circumference from baseline to 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
|
The mean change in hip circumference using a tape measure will be assessed from baseline to 6 months.
|
Baseline to 6 months
|
|
Mean change in waist-to-hip circumference ratio from baseline to 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
|
The mean change in waist-to-hip circumference ratio will be mathematically calculated from the hip and waist measurements.
|
Baseline to 6 months
|
|
Mean change in height from baseline to 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
|
The mean change in height will be assessed using a stadiometer from baseline to 6 months.
|
Baseline to 6 months
|
|
Mean change in body mass index (BMI) from baseline to 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
|
The mean change in body mass index will be mathematically calculated from the body weight and height measurements from baseline to 6 months.
|
Baseline to 6 months
|
|
Mean change in Food and Nutrition Insecurity from baseline to 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
|
The mean change in food and nutrition insecurity will be measured through validated questionnaires (e.g., US Household Food Security Survey Module) from baseline to 6 months.
|
Baseline to 6 months
|
|
Mean Change in Loneliness and Socialization Measures from baseline to 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
|
The mean change in loneliness and socialization measures using validated questionnaires (e.g., Socialization questionnaire) from baseline to 6 months.
|
Baseline to 6 months
|
|
Mean change in frequency of meal participation and participation in other activities at the Senior Center from baseline to 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
|
The mean change in frequency of meal participation and participation in other activities at the Senior Center will be assessed using the current Senior Center's attendance log.
|
Baseline to 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Andres V Ardisson Korat, ScD, Tuft's University
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 19, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
May 27, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 27, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 19, 2026
Last Verified
May 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00007007
- 58-8050-3-003 (Other Grant/Funding Number: USDA Cooperative Agreement)
- PT0445 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Danone Institute of North America)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
Participant privacy given the small sample size (n=30)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Dietary Quality
-
Baylor College of MedicineCompleted
-
Penn State UniversityNational Dairy CouncilNot yet recruitingMicrobiome | Dietary Quality | Executive Functions (EF)United States
-
Far Eastern Memorial HospitalFu Jen Catholic UniversityRecruitingPregnancy | Nutrition | Methylation | Birth Outcomes | Homocysteine | Trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) | Dietary Intake Assessment | Dietary Quality | Infant NeurodevelopmentTaiwan
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNot yet recruitingFood Insecurity | Behavioral Economics | Implementation Science | Dietary QualityUnited States
-
HALEONCompletedDietary SupplementsUnited States
-
University of ConnecticutNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); Duke UniversityRecruitingCardiovascular Diseases | Hypertension | Recruitment | Dietary QualityUnited States
-
Nektium Pharma SLClínica BaremCompletedQuality of Life | Menopause | Dietary SupplementsSpain
-
Norwegian School of Sport SciencesUniversity of Agder; Ostfold University College; University College of Southeast...CompletedQuality of Life | Physical Activity | Dietary Habits | Body Image Disturbance | Body ImageNorway
-
University of Nevada, Las VegasMcCormick Science InstituteRecruitingBody Composition | Feasibility Studies | Gut Microbiome | Acceptability | Inflammation Biomarkers | Dietary Quality | College Student | Dietary Guidelines for Americans | Lipid Profiles | Herbs and Spices | AnthropometricsUnited States
-
University of Nebraska LincolnNational Cattlemen's Beef Association, a contractor to the Beef CheckoffRecruitingCognitive Ability, General | Dietary Intervention | Dietary Proteins | Dietary AssessmentUnited States