Surgical Repair of Pediatric Concealed Penis is Generally Safe and Efficacious. Criteria for Pediatric Concealed Penis Surgical Success Are Still Poorly Standardized, so Our Study Presents a Multi-dimensional Framework Consisting of Morphometric Measurements and Subjective Psychometric Parameters. (MPPPS SPL BPL)

A Standardized Multidimensional Framework for Long-Term Outcomes Following Pediatric Concealed Penis Repair: A Prospective Cohort Study.

A concealed penis (CP) refers to a condition in which the normally-sized penis appears smaller or completely hidden in the prepubic area. Surgical repair of pediatric concealed penis is generally safe and efficacious. Criteria for pediatric concealed penis surgical success are still poorly standardized, so our study presents a multi-dimensional framework consisting of objective morphometric measurement (CI) and subjective psychometric tools (BP Questionnaire and MPPPS) for comprehensive evaluation of long-term anatomical, functional and aesthetic outcomes following the repair.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Concealed Penis
• Intervention / Treatment: Procedure: penoplasty by complete penile degloving to release all anomalous restrictive attachments, followed by phallopexy via proper fixation of the penile base

Detailed Description

This prospective cohort study was performed at General Surgery Department of Kafrelsheikh University Hospital between December 2023 and December 2024. The study included 75 pediatric patients (age ranged from 1 to 12 years) diagnosed with concealed penis. We excluded children with micropenis, hypospadius, cryptorchidism, and blood coagulation disorders. Under GA, in the supine position, a 5/0 vicryl traction suture was applied to the glans penis. A circumferential incision was made, leaving about 5 mm of collar mucosa below the coronal sulcus. In subdartos plane, the penis was completely degloved to its base at the peno-pubic angle dorsally and to the peno-scrotal angle ventrally. All dysgenetic dartos attachments were sharply excised using scissors . Hemostasis was maintained using bipolar diathermy. A two-point penile fixation technique was performed utilizing 4/0 PDS (polydioxanone) sutures, as the penile base was anchored to pubic fascia, at 2 and 10 o'clock positions . Then dermis of penile skin is sutured to Buck's fascia at the the penile base and the midshaft using 5/0 PDS sutures on both sides of the dorsal neurovascular bundle. Following the excision of redundant preputial skin, the remaining skin was approximated to collar mucosa by interrupted 6/0 Vicryl stitches . A compression dressing soaked with antibiotic cream was applied and kept for 2 days. Patients were discharged on the day of surgery, with a prescription for oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs), scheduled for the initial outpatient clinic visit after two days for dressing removal and the initiation of topical antibiotic cream (three times daily). A second evaluation was performed at the end of the first postoperative week to monitor early recovery and detect any immediate complications as penile edema, wound hematoma or infection. Longitudinal assessment was maintained via monthly visits for a total duration of one year. This standardized follow-up facilitated consistent collection of morphometric measurements and psychometric assessment of parental perceptions and satisfaction scores.

Evaluation A. Quantitative Morphometric Assessment: Pre and post-operative measurements of baseline penile length (BPL), and the stretched penile length (SPL) were recorded. The Concealed Index (CI), calculated as the ratio of BPL to SPL, was utilized as a standardized morphometric evaluating parameter. It was calculatedd and recorded at three intervals; preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at the one-year follow-up to assess both immediate gains and long-term durability.

B. Evaluation of parental perception and satisfaction: Parent-reported outcomes were evaluated at the one-year follow-up mark, using two validated psychometric parameters introduced to parents to assess their feedback and satisfaction level: The first tool was the Buried Penis Questionnaire: a pre-approved questionnaire was applied to evaluate the functional outcomes of the surgical repair as penile length improvement, maintainance of hygiene, resolution of urination difficulties and parental psychosocial burden alleviation. The second was the Modified Paediatric Penile Perception Score (MPPPS)to assess hypospadias repair outcomes, and then was modified to evaluate aesthetic outcomes of concealed penis correction. This tool evaluates three domains: penile length, appearance of penile skin, and overall penile appearance. Each domain was quantified using a 4-point scale (0-3), where 0 denotes 'very dissatisfied', 1 'dissatisfied', 2 'satisfied', and 3 'very satisfied'. Total score (0-9) provided a metric for assessing parental satisfaction with long-term surgical outcome.

• Study Type: Observational
• Enrollment (Actual): 75

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Egypt
  • Kafr ash Shaykh, Egypt, 33516
    • Omar Afandy

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Child
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study included 75 pediatric patients (age ranged from 1 to 12 years) diagnosed with concealed penis

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• children diagnosed with concealed penis, age ranged from 1 to 12 years

Exclusion Criteria:

• children with micropenis, hypospadius, cryptorchidism, and blood coagulation disorders.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
The immediate postoperative period	number of participants with postoperative penile skin edema	1-2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
The longterm postoperative results	number of participants with secondary penile retraction in the long-term	1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Eslam Saad Hamza

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): December 1, 2023
• Primary Completion (Actual): December 1, 2024
• Study Completion (Actual): December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: May 19, 2026
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 22, 2026
• First Posted (Actual): May 29, 2026

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): May 29, 2026
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 22, 2026
• Last Verified: May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: satisfaction; degloving; concealed
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Wounds and Injuries; Soft Tissue Injuries; Behavior; Degloving Injuries; Personal Satisfaction
• Other Study ID Numbers: Approval Number. KFSIRB200-351

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No