- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07615491
PMCF Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of METROSAN Spinal Systems and BONEGRAFT Filling Materials (INFO SPINE)
A Prospective, Multi-Center, Observational Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF) Study Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of METROSAN Spinal Systems and BONEGRAFT Filling Materials Used in Spinal Instrumentation and Fusion Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
- Device: Titania® Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage (Titanium)
- Device: Titania® Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage (PEEK)
- Device: Titania® Posterior Cervical Stabilization System
- Device: Titania® Cervical Plate System
- Device: Titania® Cervical Dynamic Stabilization System (Elastic Rod)
- Device: Titania® Cervical Disc Prosthesis (Titanium)
- Device: Titania® Cervical Disc Prosthesis (PEEK)
- Device: Titania® Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages (Titanium)
- Device: Titania® Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages (PEEK)
- Device: Titania® Interspinous Fusion Device (Titanium)
- Device: Titania® Posterior Thoracolumbar Stabilization Systems
- Device: Titania® Posterior Thoracolumbar Clamp Systems
- Device: Titania® Thoracolumbar Dynamic Stabilization System (Elastic Rod)
- Device: Bonegraft® Synthetic Bone Grafts
- Device: Bonegraft® Bone Cement
Detailed Description
This prospective, multi-center, observational study evaluates the safety and clinical performance of Titania® spinal instrumentation and fusion systems (manufactured by METROSAN End. ve Elk. Mek. Cihazlar ve Tibbi Malz. San. Tic. Ltd. Sti.) and Bonegraft® bone filling materials, including synthetic bone grafts and bone cements (manufactured by Bonegraft Biyolojik Malzemeler San. ve Tic. A.S.). All investigational products are CE marked and registered in the Turkish Ministry of Health's Product Tracking System (UTS).
The study is purely observational; no additional medical procedures, interventions, or tests beyond routine clinical practice will be performed. Data collection includes retrospective review of preoperative and intraoperative information from patient files, followed by prospective follow-up data collection using a study-specific Electronic Case Report Form (e-CRF). Subjects will be evaluated during routine clinical visits at post-operative Day 12 (±5 days), Week 6, and Months 3, 6, and 12.
Seventeen distinct product groups are evaluated independently, covering cervical interbody fusion cages (Titanium and PEEK), posterior cervical stabilization systems, cervical plate systems, cervical dynamic stabilization systems, cervical disc prostheses (Titanium and PEEK), lumbar interbody fusion cages (Titanium and PEEK), interspinous fusion devices, posterior thoracolumbar stabilization systems, posterior thoracolumbar clamp systems, thoracolumbar dynamic stabilization systems, and bone filling materials (bone cements and synthetic bone grafts).
The enrollment period is planned for 12 months, followed by a 12-month follow-up for each participant. An additional 5 months is allocated for data analysis and reporting, with a total study duration of 29 months. The total estimated enrollment is 561 subjects.
The study is conducted in accordance with the EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) 2017/745, the Turkish Medical Device Regulation (dated 02.06.2021), ICH-GCP guidelines, the Declaration of Helsinki, and applicable Turkish legislation regarding the protection of personal data.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Burak Tülü, Sponsor's Representative
- Phone Number: +90 (236) 213 10 14
- Email: b.tulu@metrosan.com.tr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye), 35150
- Recruiting
- Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery
-
Contact:
- Hasan Kamil Sucu, Professor
- Phone Number: +90 (505) 211 8744
- Email: hksucu@gmail.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Hasan Kamil Sucu, Professor
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Ismail Ertan Sevin, Asst. Prof.
-
Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye), 35390
- Not yet recruiting
- Demokrasi University Buca Seyfi Demirsoy Training and Research Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery
-
Contact:
- Gorkem Yavas, Asst. Prof.
- Phone Number: +90 (537) 331 1559
- Email: gorkemyavas@gmail.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Gorkem Yavas, Asst. Prof.
-
Van, Turkey (Türkiye), 65000
- Not yet recruiting
- Van Yuzuncu Yil University Dursun Odabas Medical Center, Department of Neurosurgery
-
Contact:
- Mehmet Edip Akyol, Assoc. Prof.
- Phone Number: +90 (532) 168 2165
- Email: mehmetedipakyol@yyu.edu.tr
-
Principal Investigator:
- Mehmet Edip Akyol, Assoc. Prof.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Patients aged 18 years or older who underwent cervical or thoracolumbar spinal instrumentation and/or fusion surgery under current medical practice with appropriate indications, in whom at least one of the investigational devices was used, and who meet all inclusion and no exclusion criteria. The study will enroll a total of 561 subjects across 17 product groups (33 subjects per group, accounting for a 10% dropout rate) at 3 centers in Turkey.
All patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty using Tıpmed™ Primary Hip Prosthesis Systems, who were informed about this study and voluntarily agreed to participate will be included.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age or older.
- Skeletally mature.
- Male or female.
- Undergone spinal surgery (cervical or thoracolumbar) for any indication under current medical practice.
- Titania® spinal stabilization/fusion systems and/or BONEGRAFT® bone cements or BONEGRAFT® bone graft materials used during the operation.
- No general health condition contraindicating surgery.
- No legal restriction (military service, incarceration, or equivalent).
- Provision of signed and dated Informed Consent Form (ICF)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participation in another interventional clinical investigation
- Suspected or confirmed pregnancy
- Morbid obesity
- Neurological or psychiatric conditions preventing compliance with postoperative care and instructions
- Active spinal or systemic infection
- High fever or leukocytosis
- Severe osteoporosis and/or disease affecting bone metabolism
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to PEEK, Titanium, or PMMA
- Congenital abnormality, tumor, or other condition preventing secure implant fixation or likely to shorten implant useful life
- Inadequate tissue coverage at the operative site
- Legally restricted individuals (military personnel, prisoners, etc.)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Cervical Interbody Fusion Cages (Titanium)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Cervical Interbody Fusion Cages (Titanium)" will be followed for 12 months.
|
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice.
As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
|
|
Cervical Interbody Fusion Cages (PEEK)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Cervical Interbody Fusion Cages (PEEK)" will be followed for 12 months.
|
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice.
As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
|
|
Posterior Cervical Stabilization Systems
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Posterior Cervical Stabilization Systems" will be followed for 12 months.
|
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice.
As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
|
|
Cervical Plate Systems
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Cervical Plate System" will be followed for 12 months.
|
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice.
As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
|
|
Cervical Dynamic Stabilization Systems (Elastic Rod)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Cervical Dynamic Stabilization Systems (Elastic Rod)" will be followed for 12 months.
|
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice.
As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
|
|
Cervical Disc Prosthesis (Titanium)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Cervical Disc Prosthesis (Titanium)" will be followed for 12 months.
|
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice.
As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
|
|
Cervical Disc Prosthesis (PEEK)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Cervical Disc Prosthesis (PEEK)" will be followed for 12 months.
|
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice.
As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
|
|
Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages (Titanium)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages (Titanium)" will be followed for 12 months.
|
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice.
As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
|
|
Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages (PEEK)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages (PEEK)" will be followed for 12 months.
|
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice.
As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
|
|
Interspinous Fusion Device (Titanium)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Interspinous Fusion Device (Titanium)" will be followed for 12 months.
|
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice.
As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
|
|
Posterior Thoracolumbar Stabilization Systems
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Posterior Thoracolumbar Stabilization Systems" will be followed for 12 months.
|
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice.
As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
|
|
Posterior Thoracolumbar Clamp Systems
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Posterior Thoracolumbar Clamp Systems" will be followed for 12 months.
|
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice.
As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
|
|
Thoracolumbar Dynamic Stabilization Systems (Elastic Rod)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Thoracolumbar Dynamic Stabilization Systems (Elastic Rod)" will be followed for 12 months.
|
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice.
As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
|
|
Synthetic Bone Grafts (Cervical Application)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Bonegraft® Synthetic Bone Grafts" will be followed for 12 months.
The product is evaluated within this group specifically for its application and clinical outcomes (e.g., NDI scores) in the cervical region.
|
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice.
As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
|
|
Synthetic Bone Grafts (Thoracolumbar Application)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Bonegraft® Synthetic Bone Grafts" will be followed for 12 months.
The product is evaluated within this group specifically for its application and clinical outcomes (e.g., ODI scores) in the thoracolumbar region.
|
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice.
As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
|
|
Bone Cement (Cervical Application)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Bonegraft® Synthetic Bone Cement" will be followed for 12 months.
The product is evaluated within this group specifically for its application and clinical outcomes (e.g., ODI scores) in the cervical region.
|
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice.
As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
|
|
Bone Cement (Thoracolumbar Application)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Bonegraft® Synthetic Bone Cement" will be followed for 12 months.
The product is evaluated within this group specifically for its application and clinical outcomes (e.g., ODI scores) in the thoracolumbar region.
|
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice.
As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Neck Disability Index (NDI) score from baseline (for Cervical Spinal Instrumentation and Fusion Systems)
Time Frame: [12 months]
|
The NDI is used to evaluate neck-pain-related disability.
It consists of 10 items, each scored from 0 to 5. While the total raw score ranges from 0 to 50, results are expressed as a percentage (0-100%) for clinical evaluation, consistent with the referenced literature (Heller et al., 2009).
Following clinical benchmarks, a reduction of ≥15% in the NDI score at the 12th-month follow-up compared to baseline is defined as a successful clinical improvement.
|
[12 months]
|
|
Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score from baseline (for Thoracolumbar Spinal Instrumentation and Fusion Systems)
Time Frame: [12 months]
|
The ODI is used to assess the impact of thoracolumbar pain on daily life activities (personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sexual life, social life, and travel). It consists of 10 items, each scored from 0 to 5. The total score is calculated using the formula: (total score x 100) / (5 x number of questions answered), resulting in a scale from 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Evaluations will be performed at baseline (pre-op) and at each follow-up visit (Day 12, Week 6, and Months 3, 6, and 12). A reduction of ≥15 points in the ODI score at the 12th-month follow-up compared to baseline is defined as a successful clinical improvement. |
[12 months]
|
|
Fusion rate for Spinal Fusion Systems
Time Frame: [12 months]
|
Fusion status will be evaluated using radiographs and/or CT scans (if available) at each postoperative follow-up visit. The assessment is based on the presence of a continuous trabecular bone bridge between the vertebral bodies. Fusion will be categorized into three groups: Solid Fusion: Presence of a continuous bone bridge between the vertebrae. Fibrous Fusion: Absence of a continuous bone bridge, but no signs of instability (translation < 3 mm on dynamic radiographs). Non-fusion: Absence of a continuous bone bridge along with abnormal motion (> 3 mm translation on radiographs). The evaluation will be concluded once solid fusion is achieved. |
[12 months]
|
|
Adjacent segment motion in subjects with dynamic instrumentation
Time Frame: [12 months]
|
In subjects undergoing dynamic posterior stabilization, motion at the adjacent segments will be evaluated using flexion and extension radiographs (if available) at all follow-up visits.
The primary assessment involves measuring the differences in the disc space angles.
These measurements will be compared with baseline (preoperative) values to monitor changes in adjacent segment mobility over the 12-month follow-up period.
|
[12 months]
|
|
Change in Intervertebral Disc Height
Time Frame: [12 months]
|
The intervertebral disc height will be evaluated at each follow-up visit using the Dabbs method.
The assessment is based on the average of the measurements taken from the anterior and posterior regions of the disc space, expressed in millimeters (mm) by the formula (A+B)/2.
These radiological measurements will be compared with preoperative (baseline) values to identify any changes in disc height throughout the 12-month follow-up period.
|
[12 months]
|
|
Assessment of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Intervertebral disc degeneration will be evaluated at each follow-up visit using the Pfirrmann Classification system.
This system grades the degree of disc degeneration based on MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) findings, focusing on disc structure, distinction between nucleus and annulus, signal intensity, and disc height.
The scale ranges from Grade I (normal disc structure with high signal intensity) to Grade V (severe degeneration with collapsed disc space).
Categorical grades obtained at each control period will be compared with baseline (preoperative) status to monitor the progression or stabilization of disc degeneration throughout the 12-month follow-up period, where a shift toward higher grades signifies worsening of degeneration.
|
12 months
|
|
Cervical and segmental lordosis assessment (for Cervical Spinal Instrumentation and Fusion Systems)
Time Frame: [12 months]
|
Cervical and segmental lordosis will be evaluated at each follow-up visit and compared with preoperative measurements.
Lateral radiographs of the cervical spine will be used to measure lordosis angles using the Cobb angle method.
This assessment aims to monitor the maintenance or restoration of the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine and the specific treated segments throughout the 12-month follow-up period.
|
[12 months]
|
|
Lordosis restoration and sagittal balance assessment (for Thoracolumbar Spinal Instrumentation and Fusion Systems)
Time Frame: [12 months]
|
Sagittal balance and lordosis restoration will be evaluated using full-spine radiographs (tele-radiographies, if available) at baseline and each follow-up visit (Day 12, Week 6, Months 3, 6, and 12).
Clinical success will be assessed based on the Schwab sagittal alignment classification parameters.
This assessment is a categorical evaluation based on whether patients achieve the predefined optimal correction thresholds for three key spinal parameters: 1) Sagittal Vertical Axis (SVA) < 50 millimeters, 2) Pelvic Tilt (PT) < 20 degrees, and 3) Pelvic Incidence minus Lumbar Lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch within ±9 degrees.
At each follow-up period, patients will be categorized into two groups: those who achieve all these optimal parameters and those who do not.
Patients meeting all three thresholds will be classified as 'successful' according to the Schwab criteria.
|
[12 months]
|
|
Incidence of adverse events and complications
Time Frame: [12 months]
|
Safety data will be collected by recording all adverse events (AEs) and complications encountered during the 12-month follow-up period.
This includes intraoperative complications, device-related failures, and any postoperative adverse events (e.g., infection, neurological deficit, or reoperation).
|
[12 months]
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical outcome assessment using Odom's Criteria
Time Frame: [12 months]
|
Patient clinical outcomes will be evaluated at each follow-up visit using Odom's Criteria, which classifies results as 'Excellent', 'Good', 'Fair', or 'Poor' based on symptom relief and the ability to perform daily activities.
Clinical success is defined as the proportion of subjects achieving 'Excellent' or 'Good' scores, representing significant improvement compared to baseline.
|
[12 months]
|
|
Assessment of pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: [12 months]
|
Pain intensity and changes in pain levels will be evaluated at each follow-up visit using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and compared with baseline measurements.
Patients mark their pain level on a 100 mm (or 10 cm) line, where 0 represents no pain and 100 represents the worst pain.
A decrease of ≥20 mm (or 2 cm) in pain intensity at the 12th-month follow-up compared to baseline is considered a successful clinical outcome.
|
[12 months]
|
|
Assessment of health-related quality of life with SF-12
Time Frame: [12 months]
|
Health-related quality of life and changes in quality of life perception will be evaluated at each follow-up visit using the SF-12 Health Survey and compared with baseline measurements.
Each domain of the survey is evaluated independently.
Scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst possible health state and 100 represents the best possible health state.
|
[12 months]
|
|
Patient satisfaction assessment
Time Frame: [12 months]
|
Patient satisfaction will be evaluated at the final follow-up visit (12 months) using a 3-point Likert scale based on three specific questions directed to the subject.
The scale consists of three response options: 'Yes', 'Undecided', and 'No'.
The proportion of patients responding 'Yes' to the satisfaction questions will be analyzed to determine the overall treatment satisfaction rate.
|
[12 months]
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Hasan Kamil Sucu, Professor, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Bone Diseases
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Wounds and Injuries
- Neoplasms by Site
- Neoplasms
- Spinal Diseases
- Fractures, Bone
- Nervous System Neoplasms
- Central Nervous System Neoplasms
- Spinal Cord Diseases
- Spondylolysis
- Spondylosis
- Back Injuries
- Spinal Injuries
- Spinal Stenosis
- Spondylolisthesis
- Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
- Spinal Cord Neoplasms
- Spinal Fractures
Other Study ID Numbers
- INFO SPINE
- 2025-223 (Other Identifier: Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency (TITCK))
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Stenosis
-
Azienda Usl di BolognaCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Degenerative Lumbar Spinal StenosisItaly
-
RTI SurgicalCompletedSpinal Disease | Spinal Instability | Spinal Stenosis Occipito-Atlanto-Axial | Spinal Stenosis Cervical | Spinal Stenosis Cervicothoracic RegionUnited States
-
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical...Xuzhou Central Hospital; The First People's Hospital of LianyungangNot yet recruiting
-
Punjab Health Care CommissionRecruitingLumbar Spinal StenosisPakistan
-
Ain Shams UniversityGeneral Organization for Teaching Hospitals and InstitutesCompletedLumbar Spinal StenosisEgypt
-
Hatice Çetintürk ŞahinCompletedLumbar Spinal StenosisTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Universidad Complutense de MadridHospital San Carlos, Madrid; FUNDACION PARA LA INVESTIGACION HOSPITAL CLINICO...RecruitingLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS) | Lumbar Canal StenosisSpain
-
Sutherland Medical CenterActive, not recruitingSpinal Stenosis Lumbar | Spinal Canal StenosisPoland
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Thoracic Spinal StenosisUnited States
Clinical Trials on Titania® Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage (Titanium)
-
Ohio State UniversityNexxt Spine, LLCCompletedLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Spondylolisthesis | Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease | Lumbar Spondylosis | Lumbar Spinal DeformityUnited States
-
Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and EducationCoreLink, LLCCompletedDegenerative Disc Disease Lumbar
-
Medicrea InternationalCompletedCervical Disc Disease | Cervical Discopathy | C-CURVE , Cervical Interbody CageFrance, Belgium
-
Bio2 TechnologiesMCRATerminatedSymptomatic Cervical Disc DiseaseUnited States
-
Silony Medical GmbHActive, not recruitingDegenerative Cervical Disc Disease | Degenerative Lumbar DiseasesUnited States
-
Sohag UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterMedtronicEnrolling by invitationCervical Radiculopathy | Cervical MyelopathyUnited States
-
SPINEVISION SASEVAMEDActive, not recruitingIntervertebral Disc DegenerationFrance
-
DePuy SpineCompleted
-
Restor3DTerminated