A 20-Year Follow-up of First Episode Psychosis: Longitudinal Effects of Early Treatment Strategies and Relapse

May 28, 2026 updated by: Dr. Christy Lai-ming Hui, The University of Hong Kong

Navigating the Longitudinal Effects of Early Treatment Strategies and Relapse on Clinical, Cognitive, and Functional Outcomes: A 20-Year Follow-up of First Episode Psychosis

The study aims to address the following questions:

  1. Do subgroups defined by early medication choices, relapse, and medication taken over 20 years differ in clinical, cognitive, and functional outcomes?
  2. What are the long-term cognitive functioning trajectories, what factors predict these trajectories, and how do they relate to outcomes?
  3. What might be the mechanisms behind medication discontinuation and poor long-term outcome, including the roles of multiple relapses and treatment resistance after first-episode psychosis?

Eligible patients will be invited to a one-time face-to-face interview. A trained research assistant will guide the participants through questions about their background, clinical symptoms, daily functioning, cognitive abilities, and psychological well-being.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders are highly heterogeneous, with long-term outcomes shaped by early treatment decisions. Antipsychotic medications are effective in preventing relapse, but prolonged use carries substantial side effects, and many patients discontinue in real-world settings. Evidence on the long-term impact of early discontinuation remains scarce. This project is a 20-year follow-up of a uniquely well-characterized cohort of 178 individuals with first episode psychosis (FEP), originally enrolled in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of antipsychotic maintenance versus discontinuation after achieving sustained remission (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00334035). At the 10-year follow-up, over 80% of the cohort were successfully reassessed, providing rare insights into long-term outcomes (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01926340).

Eligible participants will be re-contacted for a one-time assessment including structured clinical interviews, cognitive testing, psychosocial and qualitative measures. Retrospective case-note reviews will extract longitudinal data on relapse episodes, medication use, hospitalizations, and available laboratory results.

Data will be analyzed using latent class analysis to identify subgroups, latent growth models for cognitive trajectories, and regression approaches to test predictors and outcomes.

Ethical safeguards include re-consenting all participants, pre screening/ redacting medical records to preserve rater blinding,and strict de-identification of data. This study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and relevant institutional guidelines.

By extending this landmark cohort to 20 years, the study will provide novel evidence to guide personalized treatment decisions and inform policies on long-term antipsychotic use in psychosis.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

178

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Lai Ming Christy Hui, PhD
  • Phone Number: 852-22554486
  • Email: christy@lmhui.com

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, China
        • The University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Trained research assistants will approach active patients at their upcoming psychiatric out-patient consultations at the hospitals to introduce the follow-up study and to obtain written informed consent.

Description

Participants were individuals who previously participated in a randomized controlled trial investigating medication continuation/discontinuation on relapse during first episode psychosis (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00334035). The trial included specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, detailed as follows:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A diagnosis of schizophrenia or non-affective psychosis (schizophreniform disorder, schizoaffective disorder, brief psychotic disorder, or psychosis not otherwise specified) (DSM-IV)
  • Aged 18 to 65 years at the time of original enrolment
  • Had been treated with antipsychotic drugs for at least 12 months
  • No history of relapse or exacerbation or had to be asymptomatic (free of positive symptoms of psychosis) at study entry.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A diagnosis of drug-induced psychosis
  • Current treatment with clozapine, with mood stabilizing medications (lithium, valproate or carbamazepine) or with depot medication
  • Had high risk of suicide or violence
  • Inability to provide informed consent at recruitment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Early maintenance treatment group
Drug (quetiapine, 400mg/d) during the 12-month randomized phase of the study
Early discontinuation group
Drug (placebo) during the 12-month randomized phase of the study

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Long-term Clinical Outcome
Time Frame: From enrollment to 20-year follow-up
Poor clinical outcome is defined categorically as any of: Persistent positive symptoms of psychosis, requirement for clozapine, or death from suicide. A good clinical outcome is defined as meeting none of the above criteria
From enrollment to 20-year follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Long-term Overall Functioning
Time Frame: Assessed for 6 months preceding the follow-up assessment
Evaluated using the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS). Lower scores reflect poorer functioning in social and work-related domains, irrespective of psychopathology
Assessed for 6 months preceding the follow-up assessment
Long-term Role Functioning
Time Frame: Assessed for 6 months preceding the follow-up assessment
Evaluated using the Role Functioning Scale (RFS), which assesses functioning across key domains including work productivity, independent living and self-care, relationships with immediate social networks, and relationships with extended social networks. Higher scores indicate better functioning
Assessed for 6 months preceding the follow-up assessment
Overall Clinical Status
Time Frame: Within 6 months previous to the follow-up assessment
Evaluated using the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale, a measure of global illness severity and change in condition over time. The scale comprises Severity and Improvement ratings, with higher scores indicating more severe current illness and worsened clinical status over the past six months, respectively
Within 6 months previous to the follow-up assessment
Long-term Psychopathology
Time Frame: Within 6 months previous to the follow-up assessment
Evaluated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), which evaluates self-reported symptom severity across positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and general psychopathology domains. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity
Within 6 months previous to the follow-up assessment
Long-term Positive Symptoms
Time Frame: Within 6 months previous to the follow-up assessment
Evaluated using the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS), which evaluates self-reported symptom severity across domains including hallucinations, delusions, bizarre behavior, and formal thought disorder. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity
Within 6 months previous to the follow-up assessment
Long-term Negative Symptoms
Time Frame: Within 6 months previous to the follow-up assessment
Evaluated using the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), which evaluates self-reported domains including affective flattening, alogia, avolition-apathy, anhedonia-asociality, and attention-related impairment. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity
Within 6 months previous to the follow-up assessment
Medication Adherence
Time Frame: Within 1 month previous to the follow-up assessment
Evaluated using the Medication Compliance Questionnaire (MCQ), which includes subscales assessing self-reported medication-taking behaviors and medication-related attitudes. Higher scores indicate better medication adherence and more positive attitudes toward medication
Within 1 month previous to the follow-up assessment
Semantic Memory and Executive Function
Time Frame: Assessed at the follow-up assessment
Participants engage in a Verbal Fluency Task, where they will be asked to name as many animals as possible within one minute. Outcomes include the counts of correct, repeated, and incorrect responses. Higher numbers of correct responses indicate better cognitive functioning
Assessed at the follow-up assessment
Verbal Working Memory
Time Frame: Assessed at the follow-up assessment
Participants engage in a Letter-Number Span Test, where they will be asked to repeat sequences of numbers and letters presented verbally by research staff in forward or backward order. The number of items to be recalled gradually increases throughout the task. Higher scores indicate better working memory performance
Assessed at the follow-up assessment
Visual Working Memory and Spatial Processing
Time Frame: Assessed at the follow-up assessment
Participants engage in a Visual Patterns Test, where they will be required to remember and reproduce visually presented geometric patterns after brief exposure. Higher scores indicate better visual memory performance
Assessed at the follow-up assessment
Stressful Life Events
Time Frame: Within 6 months previous to the follow-up assessment
The Stressful Life Events (SLE) questionnaire evaluates the number of significant life events experienced (e.g., loss of a loved one, severe financial problems) and the associated level of distress reported by participants. Higher scores indicate greater exposure to stressful events and/or higher levels of distress
Within 6 months previous to the follow-up assessment
Health-Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: Varies according to the individual questionnaire items, ranging from the past 4 weeks to the past 12 months prior to the follow-up assessment
Evaluated using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), which includes two subscales assessing physical health and mental health across multiple domains (e.g., physical ability in fulfilling role-related tasks, bodily pain, and emotional well-being). Higher scores indicate better perceived health status and quality of life
Varies according to the individual questionnaire items, ranging from the past 4 weeks to the past 12 months prior to the follow-up assessment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 21, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 13, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HKU/HA_HKW_IRB_UW25-571

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The data will be made available upon reasonable request, subject to ethical considerations and data privacy protections.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Subscribe