Comparison of Sacral Erector Spinae Block and Caudal Epidural Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Pediatric Hypospadias Surgery

May 26, 2026 updated by: Özlem ÖZ GERGİN, TC Erciyes University

Prospective Comparison of Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block and Caudal Epidural Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Pediatric Hypospadias Surgery

Hypospadias surgery in pediatric patients requires effective postoperative analgesia to ensure patient comfort and reduce perioperative stress. Caudal epidural block is widely used for analgesia in pediatric urological procedures; however, alternative regional techniques such as the sacral erector spinae plane (ESP) block have recently gained attention.

This prospective comparative study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of sacral ESP block and caudal epidural block in pediatric patients undergoing hypospadias surgery. Participants will be allocated to receive either sacral ESP block or caudal epidural block according to the study protocol.

The primary outcome will be postoperative pain scores within the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes will include total analgesic consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, and block-related complications.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hypospadias is one of the most common congenital urogenital anomalies in pediatric patients and typically requires surgical correction in early childhood. Effective postoperative pain management is essential to improve patient comfort, reduce perioperative stress, and prevent complications. Inadequate pain control in pediatric surgical patients has been associated with increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, and delayed recovery.

Caudal epidural block is widely used for postoperative analgesia in pediatric urological surgery due to its ease of application and high success rate. However, it has limitations such as relatively short duration of analgesia and potential side effects including motor block, urinary retention, and lower extremity weakness. Therefore, alternative regional anesthesia techniques that may provide longer-lasting analgesia with fewer side effects are of increasing interest.

The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a relatively novel regional anesthesia technique that provides both somatic and visceral analgesia and can be applied at different spinal levels. The sacral approach to ESP block has recently been described as a potential alternative for lower abdominal and urogenital surgeries. However, evidence regarding its effectiveness in pediatric hypospadias surgery remains limited.

This prospective comparative study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy, postoperative analgesic requirements, and block-related complications of sacral erector spinae plane block and caudal epidural block in pediatric patients undergoing hypospadias repair surgery.

Patients aged between 6 months and 7 years with ASA physical status I-II scheduled for hypospadias repair will be included. Participants will be allocated into either the sacral ESP block group or the caudal epidural block group according to the study protocol.

All patients will receive standardized general anesthesia and monitoring. Regional blocks will be performed under general anesthesia prior to surgery. In the sacral ESP block group, the block will be performed under ultrasound guidance using an in-plane technique, and 0.25% bupivacaine at a dose of 0.5 mL/kg will be administered. In the caudal epidural block group, the block will be performed using a standard technique with 0.25% bupivacaine at a dose of 0.5 mL/kg.

Postoperative pain will be assessed using the FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) scale at 30 minutes, and at 1, 4, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. Total postoperative analgesic consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, and block-related complications (including motor weakness, nausea and vomiting, hypotension, bradycardia, pruritus, intravascular injection, and bleeding) will be recorded.

Statistical analysis will be performed using appropriate tests according to data distribution, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male patients aged between 6 months to 7 years
  2. Scheduled for hypospadias repair surgery
  3. ASA physical status I-II
  4. No known allergy to local anesthetic agents
  5. No contraindications to peripheral nerve blocks
  6. Written informed consent obtained from parents or legal guardians

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known congenital coagulopathy
  2. Known allergy to local anesthetic agents
  3. Severe systemic disease (ASA III-IV)
  4. Severe organ failure
  5. Neurological disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sacral ESP Block Group
Patients receiving ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia
Sacral erector spinae plane block will be performed under ultrasound guidance in pediatric patients under general anesthesia. A linear ultrasound probe will be placed in the longitudinally over the sacral region to identify the sacral median crest and erector spinae muscle. Using an in-plane technique, a block needle will be advanced in a cranial-to-caudal direction, and after negative aspiration, 0.25% bupivacaine at a dose of 0.5 mL/kg will be injected beneath the erector spinae muscle at the level of the sacral vertebra. The injection will be performed incrementally with intermittent aspiration to avoid intravascular injection.
Active Comparator: Caudal Epidural Block Group
Patients receiving caudal epidural block for postoperative analgesia
Caudal epidural block will be performed in pediatric patients under general anesthesia in the lateral decubitus position. The sacrococcygeal membrane will be identified using anatomical landmarks, and a needle will be inserted into the caudal epidural space. After negative aspiration, 0.25% bupivacaine at a dose of 0.5 mL/kg will be administered slowly. Intermittent aspiration will be performed during injection to minimize the risk of intravascular or intrathecal injection.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Pain Score Assessed by FLACC Scale
Time Frame: Within the first 24 hours after surgery
Postoperative pain intensity will be assessed using the FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) scale in pediatric patients undergoing hypospadias repair surgery. FLACC scores will be recorded at 30 minutes, and at 1, 4, 12, and 24 hours after surgery.
Within the first 24 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to First Rescue Analgesia
Time Frame: Within the first 24 hours after surgery
Time from the end of surgery to the first administration of rescue analgesic medication will be recorded.
Within the first 24 hours after surgery
Total Postoperative Analgesic Consumption
Time Frame: Within the first 24 hours after surgery
Total amount of analgesic medications required within the first 24 hours after surgery will be recorded.
Within the first 24 hours after surgery
Block-Related Complications
Time Frame: Within the first 24 hours after surgery
Block-related complications including motor weakness, nausea and vomiting, hypotension, bradycardia, pruritus, intravascular injection, and bleeding will be assessed.
Within the first 24 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 5, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Sacral ESP Block

Subscribe