Effects of a Neurorehabilitation Program Based on CIMT and Non-invasive Neuromodulation Through C-tDCS on the Recovery of Paretic Upper Limb Function, Quality of Life, and Therapeutic Alliance in Women From the Araucanía Region Who Suffered a Stroke (CIMT + tDCS). ((CIMT - tDCS))

June 1, 2026 updated by: ARLETTE PATRICIA DOUSSOULIN SANHUEZA, Universidad de La Frontera

Effects of a Neurorehabilitation Program Based on Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) and Non-invasive Neuromodulation Through Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (C-tDCS) on the Recovery of Paretic Upper Limb Function, Quality of Life, and Therapeutic Alliance in Women From the Araucanía Region Who Suffered a Stroke.

General Objective To determine the effects of a neurorehabilitation program based on Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) and non-invasive neuromodulation through cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (C-tDCS) on the recovery of paretic upper limb function, quality of life, and therapeutic alliance in women from the Araucanía Region who suffered a stroke. Methodology An experimental design consisting of a single-blind randomized controlled clinical trial is proposed. The study will include two independent groups of women diagnosed with stroke, who will participate in five assessment time points (pre-treatment, intermediate, post-treatment, and two follow-ups). Motor function (Motor Activity Log-30 and ARAT), quality of life (ECVI-38), and therapeutic alliance (CAF-P) will be evaluated. The intervention includes 10 sessions (120 minutes each), delivered daily over a two-week period. The experimental group (EG) will receive CIMT combined with C-tDCS, while the control group (CG) will receive CIMT plus sham C-tDCS (using the standard safety sham protocol commonly known as "FISSFO" [Fade In of Stimulation, Brief Real Stimulation, Fade Out]). In both groups, C-tDCS will be applied during the first 20 minutes of the session simultaneously with the practice of specific upper-limb motor tasks, followed by 100 minutes of CIMT. The CG will receive the same intervention but with sham stimulation, applying current for one minute to generate the initial sensation without producing a physiological effect. Sessions will be conducted in mixed subgroups (two participants from the EG and two from the CG) sharing the same therapeutic space. A proposed sample size of N = 26 (13 patients per group) was calculated considering a statistical power of 80%, assuming a medium effect size of f = 0.25, an error probability α = 0.05, a power (1 - error probability β) = 0.95, and correlations among repeated measures = 0.50. An additional 10% was included to compensate for potential losses during follow-up. Simple random allocation of the sample will be performed using SPSS Statistics 27. Proposed Analysis Plan SPSS Statistics 27 software will be used. Initially, descriptive statistics will be employed to analyze the sample according to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Subsequently, Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient will be calculated to examine the internal consistency of the motor function and quality-of-life variables, both within and between groups and across evaluation time points. The effects of the intervention will be assessed using unifactorial intragroup and intergroup analyses of covariance (ANCOVA). In each ANCOVA, treatment will be considered the independent variable, each motor function and quality-of-life score will be considered the dependent variable, and control variables will be included as covariates. All results with p-values less than or equal to 0.05 in one-tailed tests will be considered statistically significant. Expected Results It is expected that the combination of CIMT and C-tDCS will significantly enhance motor recovery in post-stroke women. The intervention may improve upper-limb function recovery, promote better quality of life, and optimize the therapeutic alliance, resulting in greater participation in daily activities. By modulating cerebellar activity, C-tDCS may facilitate neuronal plasticity and accelerate the response to intensive training. If confirmed, the study will provide evidence for a safe, accessible, and effective neurorehabilitation strategy, opening future low-cost avenues for current rehabilitation practices.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

  • Chile
    • Araucania
      • Temuco, Araucania, Chile, 4780000
        • Recruiting
        • Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ornella Bahamondes, Msc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Mauro Obreque, Msc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women aged between 30 and 80 years.
  • Who present hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke confirmed by CT with evolution greater than 1 month, corroborated by discharge epicrisis supporting the diagnosis of the patient.
  • Who presents trunk control in sitting.
  • Score greater than 14 points on the Minimental Examination scale.
  • Function of the upper extremity, referring to taking and releasing a small ball with the affected hand and signing or accepting the consent written informed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Shoulder pain greater than 4 according to the VAS scale and spasticity greater than 2 according to the Modified Ashworth Scale.
  • Sensory compromise (visual-auditory).
  • Presence of severe aphasia.
  • Cochlear implants, aneurysm clips, brain electrodes and cardiac pacemaker.
  • Epilepsy or psychiatric disorders (diagnosed in the last 3 months).
  • Pregnancy, use of psychotropic medications.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CIMTm y ctDCS
c-tDCS will be applied during the first 20 minutes of the session simultaneously with the practice of motor tasks of specific movements aimed at the upper extremity, continuing the session with 100 minutes of CIMTm.
Other: tDCS

Intervention: The protocol will be carried out in a total of 10 sessions, with a daily frequency over a period of 2 weeks.

Experimental group: The c-tDCS will be applied for the first 20 minutes, along with the performance of the first motor tasks associated with CIMTm. To do this, a direct current of between 1.5 to 2 mA will be used in the right cerebellar hemisphere. The CIMTm will be implemented with a duration of 120 minutes and consists of 3 components: repetitive task training, use of a glove on the healthy hand and behavioral transfer package.

Control group: The electrodes will be located in the same position of the EG, but simulated stimulation (sham) will be used, which will consist of the application of an initial current that will be maintained for one minute with a 30-second ramp until reaching 1.5 mA and a 30-second descending ramp, after which the device will turn off (program available on the equipment). The CIMTm session is the same as the experimental group.

Other Names:
  • CIMT
Sham Comparator: CIMTm y ctDCS sham
c-tDCS (sham) will be used, which will consist of the application of an initial current that will be maintained for one minute with a 30-second ramp until reaching 1.5 mA and a 30-second descending ramp, after which the device will turn off (program available on the device).
Other: tDCS

Intervention: The protocol will be carried out in a total of 10 sessions, with a daily frequency over a period of 2 weeks.

Experimental group: The c-tDCS will be applied for the first 20 minutes, along with the performance of the first motor tasks associated with CIMTm. To do this, a direct current of between 1.5 to 2 mA will be used in the right cerebellar hemisphere. The CIMTm will be implemented with a duration of 120 minutes and consists of 3 components: repetitive task training, use of a glove on the healthy hand and behavioral transfer package.

Control group: The electrodes will be located in the same position of the EG, but simulated stimulation (sham) will be used, which will consist of the application of an initial current that will be maintained for one minute with a 30-second ramp until reaching 1.5 mA and a 30-second descending ramp, after which the device will turn off (program available on the equipment). The CIMTm session is the same as the experimental group.

Other Names:
  • CIMT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effects of CIMTm combined with c-tDCS on paretic upper extremity function in women with stroke.
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.
Evaluated through the Action Research Arm Test (pre- and post-treatment): scale that evaluates both arms in order to obtain a total description of the function of the upper extremity, after a cortical injury. It is made up of 19 items grouped into 4 subtests: grip, grasp, clamp, gross movement. All items are evaluated on a 4-point scale from 0 (no movement) to 3 (normal movement). This measure has been widely validated in Spanish-American speaking countries, thereby obtaining its degree of reliability and instrumental validity. The reliability analysis using Cronbach's alpha obtained in the studies was 0.96, indicating high internal consistency.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.
Effects of CIMTm combined with c-tDCS on paretic upper extremity function in women with stroke.
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks.
Evaluated through the Action Research Arm Test (pre-postreatment), a scale that evaluates both arms in order to obtain a total description of the function of the upper extremity, after a cortical injury. It is made up of 19 items grouped into 4 subtests: grip, grasp, clamp, gross movement. All items are evaluated on a 4-point scale from 0 (no movement) to 3 (normal movement). This measure has been widely validated in Spanish-American speaking countries, thereby obtaining its degree of reliability and instrumental validity. The reliability analysis using Cronbach's alpha obtained in the studies was 0.96, indicating high internal consistency.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Universidad de La Frontera

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Universidad de La Frontera
  • CIMT + ctDCS (Other Identifier: Universidad de La Frontera)
  • CIMTm + ctDCS (Other Identifier: Red Neuroaraucanía Chile)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on tDCS

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Angola

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe