Modulation of Motor Cortex Excitability by TMS and tDCS (MAGS1)

February 8, 2021 updated by: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Modulation of Motor Cortex Excitability by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Investigating modulation of motor cortex excitability by transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Purpose of this pilot study is to modulate the motor cortex excitability by transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation. Electromyography will be recorded on right abductor digiti minimi muscle to find the motor threshold and measure motor evoked potentials for each healthy participant. In addition, electroencephalography (EEG) data will be collected on the scalp with a high-density EEG net. Eighteen healthy participants will be in this study. Each participant will be seated in a reclining chair and applied non-invasive magnetic and electrical stimulations on the scalp. At baseline, the participant's resting motor threshold (RMT) will be estimated by adjusting the intensity of TMS applied on the left motor cortex to achieve motor-evoked potentials of about 50 uV with 10 TMS pulses at a rate of 0.25 Hz. Then a 3-condition, 3-session, 6-sequence randomized crossover experiment will be used to characterize and compare three versions of tDCS stimulation: anode, cathode, sham. Before and after a 10-min tDCS condition is applied, TMS pulses at 120% of RMT intensity will be applied for 10 minutes and TMS-evoked potential and motor-evoked potential amplitudes will be measured. Each session has at least 1-day gap to remove outlasting effects. We will also be collecting structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) to target primary motor cortex precisely.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male
  • Between the ages of 18 and 35
  • Right-handed
  • Capacity to understand all relevant risks and potential benefits of the study (informed consent)
  • Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study
  • Speak and understand English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior concussion
  • Diagnosis of eating disorder (current or within the past 6 months)
  • Diagnosis of obsessive compulsive disorder (lifetime)
  • Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (currently under treatment)
  • Neurological disorders and conditions, including, but not limited to:

    • History of epilepsy
    • Seizures (except childhood febrile seizures and electroconvulsive therapy-induced seizures)
    • Dementia
    • History of stroke
    • Parkinson's disease
    • Multiple sclerosis
    • Cerebral aneurysm
    • Brain tumors
  • Medical or neurological illness or treatment for a medical disorder that could interfere with study participation (e.g., unstable cardiac disease, HIV/AIDS, malignancy, liver or renal impairment)
  • Prior brain surgery
  • Any brain devices/implants, including cochlear implants and aneurysm clips
  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Anything that, in the opinion of the investigator, would place the participant at increased risk or preclude the participant's full compliance with or completion of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: anodal tDCS
Two electrodes will be applied to the scalp (one on the left motor cortex, one on the right supraorbital cortex). This anodal tDCS on the left motor cortex will be stimulated with 2mA for 10 minutes.
The participant will receive anodal tDCS with 2 mA for 10 minutes on the left motor cortex.
Active Comparator: cathodal tDCS
Two electrodes will be applied to the scalp (one on the left motor cortex, one on the right supraorbital cortex). This cathodal tDCS on the left motor cortex will be stimulated with -2mA for 10 minutes.
The participant will receive cathodal tDCS with -2 mA for 10 minutes on the left motor cortex.
Sham Comparator: sham tDCS
Two electrodes will be applied to the scalp (one on the left motor cortex, one on the right supraorbital cortex). Sham stimulation with 2mA for 40 seconds will be applied.
The participant will receive sham tDCS with 2 mA for 40 seconds on the left motor cortex which mimics the skin sensations as active tDCS interventions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Motor-evoked Potentials Ratios
Time Frame: right before and after 2mA tDCS stimulation for 10 minutes at each session
The investigators will record motor-evoked potentials and calculate changes in between before and after 2mA tDCS stimulation for 10 minutes.
right before and after 2mA tDCS stimulation for 10 minutes at each session
Changes in TMS-evoked Potentials Ratios
Time Frame: right before and after 2mA tDCS stimulation for 10 minutes at each session
The investigators will record TMS-evoked potentials using EEG and calculate changes in between before and after 2mA tDCS stimulation for 10 minutes.
right before and after 2mA tDCS stimulation for 10 minutes at each session

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Resting-state EEG Dynamics Ratios
Time Frame: 4 minutes recordings before and after each 2mA tDCS stimulation for 10 minutes at each session
The investigators will record participants' resting state for 4 minutes using EEG (2 minutes for eyes-closed and 2 minutes for eyes-open)
4 minutes recordings before and after each 2mA tDCS stimulation for 10 minutes at each session

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 24, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 17-0149
  • R01MH101547 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Motor Activity

Clinical Trials on anodal tDCS

Subscribe