Peritoneal Transport With a New Bicarbonate-based Peritoneal Dialysis Solution Compared to Conventional Solution.

June 2, 2026 updated by: Olof Heimburger, Karolinska Institutet
Cross-over study. Patients treated with peritoneal dialysis are investigated twice with a single 4h dwell study: once with Bicarbonate-Lactate solution as buffer (Physioneal TM) and once with conventional lactate PD solution (Dianeal TM). Radioidinated human serum albumin is used as a volume marker to assess ultrafiltration and frequent dialysis and blood sampling to assess peritneal transport of solutes and pH changes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD)are investigated twice of different days with a single 4h dwell study: once with solution with a solution with bicarbonate 15 mmol/L abd Lactate 15 mmol/L as buffer (Physioneal TM) and once with conventional lactate-buffered (40 mmol/L) PD solution (Dianeal TM). Aproximately 2 liter of PD solution was infused each time. Intraperitoneal fluid was sampled during the dwell at t = 0, 3, 6, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 minutes from the end of the dialysis fluid infusion and the start of the peritoneal dwell. Venous blood samples were drawn from the patient before the start of the dwell and at t = 15, 60, 120, 240 minutes.

New and spent dialysate bags were weighed before and after each dwell to assess infused and drain volumes, respectively; the volumes were adjusted for the weight of the empty bags. Radio-iodinated serum albumin (RISA) added to the solutions before infusion was used as volume marker to estimate intraperitoneal volume. The residual volume (after the previous dwell) was calculated from the dilution of the marker upon infusion of fresh dialysate; after the dwell the peritoneal cavity was rinsed with 1 liter of solution (glucose 1.36%) in order to estimate post-drain residual volume.

Ultrafiltration volume was calculated from the changes in intraperitoneal volume (using 3 minutes after infusion as reference) and corrected for volumes of taken samples. The rate of peritoneal absorption was estimated from the disappearance of the marker from the peritoneal cavity].

The composition of the pre-dialysis (residual) fluid was assessed based on the sample taken from the spent dialysate from the previous dwell.

Concentrations of urea, creatinine, glucose, phosphate, chloride, and lactate, in plasma and dialysate, were measured by Monarch 1000 (Instrumentation Laboratory, MA), while flame photometry was used for sodium and potassium. Dialysate pH was measured with a pH meter. The concentrations of calcium, CO2, bicarbonate, and plasma pH were measured by AVL OMNI Combi Blood Gas Analyzer (AVL, Graz, Austria). The plasma concentrations of glucose, sodium, urea, creatinine, potassium, chloride, and phosphate were corrected for plasma water fraction. Creatinine measurements in dialysate were corrected for glucose concentration. Albumin and beta-2 microglobulin (B2M) concentration were measured with immunological methods.

Advanced mathematical modelling is used to analyze the results and tgo asses transport parameters.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Stockholm, Sweden, S-141 86
        • Research unit, renal medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patient treated with peritoneal dialysis in a clinically stable condition

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Bicarbonate lactate solution investigatd first
The patients were studied with the bicarbonate-lactate solution the first study day and with conventional lactate.based solution on a later day.
All patients were studied twice with a 4-h dwell study (one peritoneal dialysis dwell) about 7 days apart. The two arms represent different order of the used periteonal dialysis fluid for the two dwell studies.
Experimental: Lactate solution investigated first
The patients were studied with the conventional lactate.based solution the first study day and with bicarbonate-lactate solution on a later day.
All patients were studied twice with a 4-h dwell study (one peritoneal dialysis dwell) about 7 days apart. The two arms represent different order of the used periteonal dialysis fluid for the two dwell studies.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in net ultrafiltration (ml)
Time Frame: 4 hours
Assessment of fluid transport during a PD dwell. Intraperitoenal volume changes during the 4 hour dwells will be assesed from dilution of the added volume marker with correction for absorption of the marker. Amount of marker remaining in the drained fluid after four hours will be subratcted from the initial added amount to calculate amount of marker absorbed during the dwell. Residual volumes before and after the dwell can also be calculated from dilution of the marker. This makes it possible to calculate the intraperitoneal volume of time curve during the dwell and net ultrafiltration (=net fluid removal). To simplify, the intraperitoneal volume (ml) at 240 minutes of the dwell minus the intraperitoneal volume after infusion of the dialysis fluid.
4 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes to acid-base homeostasis
Time Frame: 4 hours
Assessment of pH, concentrationa of bicarbonate and lactate i dialysate and plasma. Frequent dialysate sampling will be used and plasma levels will be assessed mutiple times. For each solute, the mass removed/absorbed will be calculated as the difference between the dialysate mass the end of the dwell (dialysate concentration times dialysate volume, corrected for total volume of samples) and mass immediately after infusion of fresh dialysate. The latter is calculated adding up the mass in residual and infused fluids. As the conventional lactate-buffered solution is acidic (pH 5.3) and the bicarbonate-lactate buffered solution is neutral (pH 7.4) the difference in pH between the solutions over time of the dwell may be described.
4 hours
Differences in small solute transport
Time Frame: 4 hours
Frequent dialysate sampling will be used and plasma levels will be assessed mutiple times for several small solutes. For each solute, the mass removed/absorbed will be calculated as the difference between the dialysate mass the end of the dwell (dialysate concentration times dialysate volume, corrected for total volume of samples) and mass immediately after infusion of fresh dialysate. The latter is calculated adding up the mass in residual and infused fluids. As the conventional lactate-buffered solution is acidic (pH 5.3) and the bicarbonate-lactate buffered solution is neutral (pH 7.4) it makes it possible to assess if pH affects transport characteristics of other solutes, in particular small solutes (Na, K, Ca, bicarbonate, lactate, creatinine, urea).
4 hours
Differences in protein transport
Time Frame: 4 hours
Frequent dialysate sampling will be used and plasma levels will be assessed mutiple times for several small solutes. For each solute, the mass removed/absorbed will be calculated as the difference between the dialysate mass the end of the dwell (dialysate concentration times dialysate volume, corrected for total volume of samples) and mass immediately after infusion of fresh dialysate. The latter is calculated adding up the mass in residual and infused fluids. As the conventional lactate-buffered solution is acidic (pH 5.3) and the bicarbonate-lactate buffered solution is neutral (pH 7.4) it makes it possible to assess if pH affects transport characteristics of proteins (albumin and beta-2-microglobuline).
4 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 9, 1997

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 13, 1997

Study Completion (Actual)

November 13, 1997

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

This study was performed almost 30 years ago. A reasonalbe request for data sharing will be considered as stated in the publications from the study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dialysis Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease

Subscribe