Pelvic Floor Training Combined With Perineal Massage Reduces Episiotomy to 5.7%

June 2, 2026 updated by: Erhan Okuyan,M.D, Batman Training and Research Hospital

Pelvic Floor Training Combined With Perineal Massage Reduces Episiotomy to 5.7%: A Four Arm Randomized Controlled Trial

Episiotomy, a surgical incision of the perineum performed during the second stage of labor, was once widely advocated for the prevention of severe perineal lacerations. However, a growing body of evidence has demonstrated that routine episiotomy is not without consequence: it is associated with increased rates of posterior perineal trauma, dyspareunia, perineal pain, and postpartum hemorrhage. In alignment with this evidence, the World Health Organization now recommends against routine or liberal episiotomy use and endorses a restrictive approach, targeting episiotomy rates below 10%. Despite these recommendations, episiotomy rates remain high in many settings, particularly among nulliparous womenDespite the individual promise of these modalities, few studies have evaluated their combined effects on episiotomy and other perineal outcomes. The different mechanisms through which PFMT, perineal massage, and Swiss ball exercises operate suggest that their concurrent use may yield additive or synergistic benefits. Nevertheless, comparative data examining PFMT alone versus PFMT combined with Swiss ball or perineal massage remain scarce.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In recent years, there has been mounting interest in the application of non-pharmacological modalities during labor and delivery. Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) has emerged as one of the most extensively studied antenatal strategies. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials demonstrated that PFMT during pregnancy significantly reduces the risk of urinary incontinence and third- or fourth-degree perineal tears; however, its effect on episiotomy rates did not reach statistical significance . Another meta-analysis corroborated these findings, showing that antenatal PFMT shortens the second stage of labor and lowers the incidence of severe perineal trauma . A more recent Bayesian network meta-analysis ranked antenatal pelvic floor exercise as the optimal first-line strategy for overall perineal laceration prevention, with a 50% risk reduction (RR = 0.50, 95% CrI 0.28-0.87) .

Perineal massage applied either antenatally or during the second stage-represents another effective non-pharmacological intervention. By increasing the elasticity and distensibility of the perineal tissues, massage facilitates gradual stretching of the birth canal. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reported that antenatal perineal massage was associated with a significantly lower incidence of episiotomies (RR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.72-0.87, p < 0.001) and perineal tears, as well as reduced second-stage duration and improved postpartum outcomes . When applied during labor, perineal massage has also been shown to reduce the risk of severe perineal trauma, although its independent effect on episiotomy remains variable across studies .

The Swiss ball, a widely accessible tool for promoting pelvic mobility and maternal comfort during labor, constitutes a third non-pharmacological option. Active pelvic movements performed on a Swiss ball including pelvic anteversion, retroversion, lateral tilts, and circular hip movements have been shown in a randomized trial to reduce the duration of the first and second stages of labor, decrease pain intensity, diminish maternal fatigue and anxiety, and lower the risk of cesarean section and vulvar swelling . An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials further confirmed that birthing ball exercises significantly reduce cesarean section rates and alleviate labor pain, supporting their use as a safe and effective intervention in low-risk labor management .

The present study was designed to address this knowledge gap. Investigators hypothesized that in pregnant women who completed nurse-led pelvic floor education sessions at least once weekly until delivery, the addition of Swiss ball exercises or perineal massage during labor would reduce episiotomy requirements. The primary objective was to compare the effects of four non-pharmacological interventions pelvic floor muscle training, combined PFMT and Swiss ball exercises, combined PFMT and perineal massage, and standard care on delivery outcomes and episiotomy-related parameters..

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

520

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consisted of pregnant women who presented to the participating healthcare facility and met the following predefined inclusion criteria. Participants who did not satisfy these criteria or who declined to provide written informed consent were excluded. All participants provided written informed consent prior to enrollment. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the institutional ethics committee.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • No prior exposure to any of the study interventions
  • Gestational age between 20 and 36 weeks at the time of enrollment
  • No history of previous episiotomy
  • Estimated fetal weight between 3,000 and 4,000 grams
  • No labor induction
  • Absence of any systemic disease complicating the current pregnancy
  • No regular use of medications or supplements other than multivitamins
  • Pre-pregnancy body mass index within the range of 18-25 kg/m²

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failure to meet any of the above inclusion criteria
  • Declining to provide written informed consen

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
1/Control
The control group received standard antenatal care without any additional intervention.
All participants in the intervention groups attended nurse-led pelvic floor education sessions at least once per week until delivery. The education program covered pelvic floor anatomy and function, identification of correct muscle contraction, performance of Kegel exercises, and diaphragmatic breathing techniques.
Other Names:
  • The education program
2/PMFE+PERİNEAL MASSAGE
All participants were taught digital perineal massage to be performed at least once daily from the 34th gestational week until delivery
All participants in the intervention groups attended nurse-led pelvic floor education sessions at least once per week until delivery. The education program covered pelvic floor anatomy and function, identification of correct muscle contraction, performance of Kegel exercises, and diaphragmatic breathing techniques.
Other Names:
  • The education program
3/PMFE+SWISS BALL
All participants additionally performed active pelvic movements on a Swiss ball during labor, including pelvic anteversion, retroversion, lateral pelvic tilts, and circular hip movements, according to individual obstetric evaluation
All participants in the intervention groups attended nurse-led pelvic floor education sessions at least once per week until delivery. The education program covered pelvic floor anatomy and function, identification of correct muscle contraction, performance of Kegel exercises, and diaphragmatic breathing techniques.
Other Names:
  • The education program
4/PMFE
In Group 4, pelvic floor muscle exercises were performed by a nurse at least once a week for at least one hour from week 34 onward.
All participants in the intervention groups attended nurse-led pelvic floor education sessions at least once per week until delivery. The education program covered pelvic floor anatomy and function, identification of correct muscle contraction, performance of Kegel exercises, and diaphragmatic breathing techniques.
Other Names:
  • The education program

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Episiotomy rate
Time Frame: 7 days

Outcome Measure 1: Episiotomy rate. The presence of episiotomy (yes/no) was recorded on a clinical follow-up form. Between-group comparisons were performed using this binary outcome.

Time Frame: 7 days after delivery.

7 days
Degree of perineal laceration
Time Frame: 7 days

Outcome Measure 2: Degree of perineal laceration. The severity of perineal trauma was classified as 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or 4th degree laceration based on clinical examination and recorded on the same form. Between-group comparisons were performed for this ordinal outcome.

Time Frame: 7 days after delivery

7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Erhan Okuyan, Batman Training and Research Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 5, 2026

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 5, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

April 5, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 28, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Due to ethical restrictions and the absence of explicit participant consent for public data sharing, individual participant data cannot be made publicly available. Data may be shared upon reasonable request, subject to approval by the institutional ethics committee and a data sharing agreement.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Episiotomy

Clinical Trials on The education program covered pelvic floor anatomy and function, identification of correct muscle contraction, performance of Kegel exercises, and diaphragmatic breathing techniques

Subscribe