Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Pelvic Floor Training Combined With Perineal Massage Reduces Episiotomy to 5.7%

2 giugno 2026 aggiornato da: Erhan Okuyan,M.D, Batman Training and Research Hospital

Pelvic Floor Training Combined With Perineal Massage Reduces Episiotomy to 5.7%: A Four Arm Randomized Controlled Trial

Episiotomy, a surgical incision of the perineum performed during the second stage of labor, was once widely advocated for the prevention of severe perineal lacerations. However, a growing body of evidence has demonstrated that routine episiotomy is not without consequence: it is associated with increased rates of posterior perineal trauma, dyspareunia, perineal pain, and postpartum hemorrhage. In alignment with this evidence, the World Health Organization now recommends against routine or liberal episiotomy use and endorses a restrictive approach, targeting episiotomy rates below 10%. Despite these recommendations, episiotomy rates remain high in many settings, particularly among nulliparous womenDespite the individual promise of these modalities, few studies have evaluated their combined effects on episiotomy and other perineal outcomes. The different mechanisms through which PFMT, perineal massage, and Swiss ball exercises operate suggest that their concurrent use may yield additive or synergistic benefits. Nevertheless, comparative data examining PFMT alone versus PFMT combined with Swiss ball or perineal massage remain scarce.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

In recent years, there has been mounting interest in the application of non-pharmacological modalities during labor and delivery. Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) has emerged as one of the most extensively studied antenatal strategies. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials demonstrated that PFMT during pregnancy significantly reduces the risk of urinary incontinence and third- or fourth-degree perineal tears; however, its effect on episiotomy rates did not reach statistical significance . Another meta-analysis corroborated these findings, showing that antenatal PFMT shortens the second stage of labor and lowers the incidence of severe perineal trauma . A more recent Bayesian network meta-analysis ranked antenatal pelvic floor exercise as the optimal first-line strategy for overall perineal laceration prevention, with a 50% risk reduction (RR = 0.50, 95% CrI 0.28-0.87) .

Perineal massage applied either antenatally or during the second stage-represents another effective non-pharmacological intervention. By increasing the elasticity and distensibility of the perineal tissues, massage facilitates gradual stretching of the birth canal. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reported that antenatal perineal massage was associated with a significantly lower incidence of episiotomies (RR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.72-0.87, p < 0.001) and perineal tears, as well as reduced second-stage duration and improved postpartum outcomes . When applied during labor, perineal massage has also been shown to reduce the risk of severe perineal trauma, although its independent effect on episiotomy remains variable across studies .

The Swiss ball, a widely accessible tool for promoting pelvic mobility and maternal comfort during labor, constitutes a third non-pharmacological option. Active pelvic movements performed on a Swiss ball including pelvic anteversion, retroversion, lateral tilts, and circular hip movements have been shown in a randomized trial to reduce the duration of the first and second stages of labor, decrease pain intensity, diminish maternal fatigue and anxiety, and lower the risk of cesarean section and vulvar swelling . An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials further confirmed that birthing ball exercises significantly reduce cesarean section rates and alleviate labor pain, supporting their use as a safe and effective intervention in low-risk labor management .

The present study was designed to address this knowledge gap. Investigators hypothesized that in pregnant women who completed nurse-led pelvic floor education sessions at least once weekly until delivery, the addition of Swiss ball exercises or perineal massage during labor would reduce episiotomy requirements. The primary objective was to compare the effects of four non-pharmacological interventions pelvic floor muscle training, combined PFMT and Swiss ball exercises, combined PFMT and perineal massage, and standard care on delivery outcomes and episiotomy-related parameters..

Tipo di studio

Osservativo

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

520

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

Metodo di campionamento

Campione di probabilità

Popolazione di studio

The study population consisted of pregnant women who presented to the participating healthcare facility and met the following predefined inclusion criteria. Participants who did not satisfy these criteria or who declined to provide written informed consent were excluded. All participants provided written informed consent prior to enrollment. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the institutional ethics committee.

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • No prior exposure to any of the study interventions
  • Gestational age between 20 and 36 weeks at the time of enrollment
  • No history of previous episiotomy
  • Estimated fetal weight between 3,000 and 4,000 grams
  • No labor induction
  • Absence of any systemic disease complicating the current pregnancy
  • No regular use of medications or supplements other than multivitamins
  • Pre-pregnancy body mass index within the range of 18-25 kg/m²

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failure to meet any of the above inclusion criteria
  • Declining to provide written informed consen

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

Coorti e interventi

Gruppo / Coorte
Intervento / Trattamento
1/Control
The control group received standard antenatal care without any additional intervention.
All participants in the intervention groups attended nurse-led pelvic floor education sessions at least once per week until delivery. The education program covered pelvic floor anatomy and function, identification of correct muscle contraction, performance of Kegel exercises, and diaphragmatic breathing techniques.
Altri nomi:
  • The education program
2/PMFE+PERİNEAL MASSAGE
All participants were taught digital perineal massage to be performed at least once daily from the 34th gestational week until delivery
All participants in the intervention groups attended nurse-led pelvic floor education sessions at least once per week until delivery. The education program covered pelvic floor anatomy and function, identification of correct muscle contraction, performance of Kegel exercises, and diaphragmatic breathing techniques.
Altri nomi:
  • The education program
3/PMFE+SWISS BALL
All participants additionally performed active pelvic movements on a Swiss ball during labor, including pelvic anteversion, retroversion, lateral pelvic tilts, and circular hip movements, according to individual obstetric evaluation
All participants in the intervention groups attended nurse-led pelvic floor education sessions at least once per week until delivery. The education program covered pelvic floor anatomy and function, identification of correct muscle contraction, performance of Kegel exercises, and diaphragmatic breathing techniques.
Altri nomi:
  • The education program
4/PMFE
In Group 4, pelvic floor muscle exercises were performed by a nurse at least once a week for at least one hour from week 34 onward.
All participants in the intervention groups attended nurse-led pelvic floor education sessions at least once per week until delivery. The education program covered pelvic floor anatomy and function, identification of correct muscle contraction, performance of Kegel exercises, and diaphragmatic breathing techniques.
Altri nomi:
  • The education program

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Episiotomy rate
Lasso di tempo: 7 days

Outcome Measure 1: Episiotomy rate. The presence of episiotomy (yes/no) was recorded on a clinical follow-up form. Between-group comparisons were performed using this binary outcome.

Time Frame: 7 days after delivery.

7 days
Degree of perineal laceration
Lasso di tempo: 7 days

Outcome Measure 2: Degree of perineal laceration. The severity of perineal trauma was classified as 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or 4th degree laceration based on clinical examination and recorded on the same form. Between-group comparisons were performed for this ordinal outcome.

Time Frame: 7 days after delivery

7 days

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Collaboratori

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Erhan Okuyan, Batman Training and Research Hospital

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

5 febbraio 2026

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

5 aprile 2026

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

5 aprile 2026

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

28 maggio 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

2 giugno 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

4 giugno 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

4 giugno 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

2 giugno 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 gennaio 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Descrizione del piano IPD

Due to ethical restrictions and the absence of explicit participant consent for public data sharing, individual participant data cannot be made publicly available. Data may be shared upon reasonable request, subject to approval by the institutional ethics committee and a data sharing agreement.

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi