Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Pelvic Floor Training Combined With Perineal Massage Reduces Episiotomy to 5.7%

2 de junio de 2026 actualizado por: Erhan Okuyan,M.D, Batman Training and Research Hospital

Pelvic Floor Training Combined With Perineal Massage Reduces Episiotomy to 5.7%: A Four Arm Randomized Controlled Trial

Episiotomy, a surgical incision of the perineum performed during the second stage of labor, was once widely advocated for the prevention of severe perineal lacerations. However, a growing body of evidence has demonstrated that routine episiotomy is not without consequence: it is associated with increased rates of posterior perineal trauma, dyspareunia, perineal pain, and postpartum hemorrhage. In alignment with this evidence, the World Health Organization now recommends against routine or liberal episiotomy use and endorses a restrictive approach, targeting episiotomy rates below 10%. Despite these recommendations, episiotomy rates remain high in many settings, particularly among nulliparous womenDespite the individual promise of these modalities, few studies have evaluated their combined effects on episiotomy and other perineal outcomes. The different mechanisms through which PFMT, perineal massage, and Swiss ball exercises operate suggest that their concurrent use may yield additive or synergistic benefits. Nevertheless, comparative data examining PFMT alone versus PFMT combined with Swiss ball or perineal massage remain scarce.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

In recent years, there has been mounting interest in the application of non-pharmacological modalities during labor and delivery. Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) has emerged as one of the most extensively studied antenatal strategies. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials demonstrated that PFMT during pregnancy significantly reduces the risk of urinary incontinence and third- or fourth-degree perineal tears; however, its effect on episiotomy rates did not reach statistical significance . Another meta-analysis corroborated these findings, showing that antenatal PFMT shortens the second stage of labor and lowers the incidence of severe perineal trauma . A more recent Bayesian network meta-analysis ranked antenatal pelvic floor exercise as the optimal first-line strategy for overall perineal laceration prevention, with a 50% risk reduction (RR = 0.50, 95% CrI 0.28-0.87) .

Perineal massage applied either antenatally or during the second stage-represents another effective non-pharmacological intervention. By increasing the elasticity and distensibility of the perineal tissues, massage facilitates gradual stretching of the birth canal. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reported that antenatal perineal massage was associated with a significantly lower incidence of episiotomies (RR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.72-0.87, p < 0.001) and perineal tears, as well as reduced second-stage duration and improved postpartum outcomes . When applied during labor, perineal massage has also been shown to reduce the risk of severe perineal trauma, although its independent effect on episiotomy remains variable across studies .

The Swiss ball, a widely accessible tool for promoting pelvic mobility and maternal comfort during labor, constitutes a third non-pharmacological option. Active pelvic movements performed on a Swiss ball including pelvic anteversion, retroversion, lateral tilts, and circular hip movements have been shown in a randomized trial to reduce the duration of the first and second stages of labor, decrease pain intensity, diminish maternal fatigue and anxiety, and lower the risk of cesarean section and vulvar swelling . An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials further confirmed that birthing ball exercises significantly reduce cesarean section rates and alleviate labor pain, supporting their use as a safe and effective intervention in low-risk labor management .

The present study was designed to address this knowledge gap. Investigators hypothesized that in pregnant women who completed nurse-led pelvic floor education sessions at least once weekly until delivery, the addition of Swiss ball exercises or perineal massage during labor would reduce episiotomy requirements. The primary objective was to compare the effects of four non-pharmacological interventions pelvic floor muscle training, combined PFMT and Swiss ball exercises, combined PFMT and perineal massage, and standard care on delivery outcomes and episiotomy-related parameters..

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Actual)

520

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Método de muestreo

Muestra de probabilidad

Población de estudio

The study population consisted of pregnant women who presented to the participating healthcare facility and met the following predefined inclusion criteria. Participants who did not satisfy these criteria or who declined to provide written informed consent were excluded. All participants provided written informed consent prior to enrollment. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the institutional ethics committee.

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • No prior exposure to any of the study interventions
  • Gestational age between 20 and 36 weeks at the time of enrollment
  • No history of previous episiotomy
  • Estimated fetal weight between 3,000 and 4,000 grams
  • No labor induction
  • Absence of any systemic disease complicating the current pregnancy
  • No regular use of medications or supplements other than multivitamins
  • Pre-pregnancy body mass index within the range of 18-25 kg/m²

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failure to meet any of the above inclusion criteria
  • Declining to provide written informed consen

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

Cohortes e Intervenciones

Grupo / Cohorte
Intervención / Tratamiento
1/Control
The control group received standard antenatal care without any additional intervention.
All participants in the intervention groups attended nurse-led pelvic floor education sessions at least once per week until delivery. The education program covered pelvic floor anatomy and function, identification of correct muscle contraction, performance of Kegel exercises, and diaphragmatic breathing techniques.
Otros nombres:
  • The education program
2/PMFE+PERİNEAL MASSAGE
All participants were taught digital perineal massage to be performed at least once daily from the 34th gestational week until delivery
All participants in the intervention groups attended nurse-led pelvic floor education sessions at least once per week until delivery. The education program covered pelvic floor anatomy and function, identification of correct muscle contraction, performance of Kegel exercises, and diaphragmatic breathing techniques.
Otros nombres:
  • The education program
3/PMFE+SWISS BALL
All participants additionally performed active pelvic movements on a Swiss ball during labor, including pelvic anteversion, retroversion, lateral pelvic tilts, and circular hip movements, according to individual obstetric evaluation
All participants in the intervention groups attended nurse-led pelvic floor education sessions at least once per week until delivery. The education program covered pelvic floor anatomy and function, identification of correct muscle contraction, performance of Kegel exercises, and diaphragmatic breathing techniques.
Otros nombres:
  • The education program
4/PMFE
In Group 4, pelvic floor muscle exercises were performed by a nurse at least once a week for at least one hour from week 34 onward.
All participants in the intervention groups attended nurse-led pelvic floor education sessions at least once per week until delivery. The education program covered pelvic floor anatomy and function, identification of correct muscle contraction, performance of Kegel exercises, and diaphragmatic breathing techniques.
Otros nombres:
  • The education program

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Episiotomy rate
Periodo de tiempo: 7 days

Outcome Measure 1: Episiotomy rate. The presence of episiotomy (yes/no) was recorded on a clinical follow-up form. Between-group comparisons were performed using this binary outcome.

Time Frame: 7 days after delivery.

7 days
Degree of perineal laceration
Periodo de tiempo: 7 days

Outcome Measure 2: Degree of perineal laceration. The severity of perineal trauma was classified as 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or 4th degree laceration based on clinical examination and recorded on the same form. Between-group comparisons were performed for this ordinal outcome.

Time Frame: 7 days after delivery

7 days

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Colaboradores

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Erhan Okuyan, Batman Training and Research Hospital

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

5 de febrero de 2026

Finalización primaria (Actual)

5 de abril de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

5 de abril de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

28 de mayo de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

2 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

4 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

4 de junio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

2 de junio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de enero de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Descripción del plan IPD

Due to ethical restrictions and the absence of explicit participant consent for public data sharing, individual participant data cannot be made publicly available. Data may be shared upon reasonable request, subject to approval by the institutional ethics committee and a data sharing agreement.

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir