Neonatal Neurological Observation With Video AI (NeoNOVA)

June 1, 2026 updated by: Artemis AI Labs
NeoNOVA is a multi-site, prospective, single-arm, silent observational study to determine: among (Population) infants admitted to newborn services during their inpatient hospital stay, whether (Intervention) continuous bedside non-contact high definition video running real-time AI analysis of anatomic landmarks and movement, (Comparison) compared against human-labeled video frames and standardized clinical exams, will (Outcome) accurately localize infant anatomic landmarks (primary objective; outcome median position error in pixels) and demonstrate a statistically significant association between a video-derived movement index and clinical measures of patient neurological exams (secondary objective; outcomes N-PASS and modified Sarnat exams).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Over 1.3 million infants are admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) in OECD countries every year. All NICU infants undergo cardiorespiratory monitoring allowing for expedient hemodynamic management. However, there is no analogous clinical decision support for neurologic monitoring, despite neurologic injury having the highest impact on long-term neurodevelopmental outcome. Neonatal encephalopathy (NE) is a leading cause of neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) and death, occurring in 3 per 1000 live births; inadequate pain control and sedation is a leading risk factor for many complications in the NICU including unplanned extubation (UE), occurring at rates 1-5 UEs per 100 intubation days. Currently, neurologic changes such as NE, pain control, and sedation are primarily assessed by physical examination. However, this approach is deeply flawed since physical examination is performed at set time intervals, is highly subjective, and may not discern subtle or subacute changes.

To fill this critical gap in neonatal care, we developed and validated NeoPose, a low-cost, non-invasive, computer vision digital health tool to continuously monitor infants using real time video streams. NeoPose uses Pose Artificial Intelligence (AI) for an explainable approach to measure, quantify, and analyze infant movement. From the vectorized movement, we can accurately confirm the presence of encephalopathy and quantify the degree of sedation. Our explainable AI platform enables continuous neuromonitoring with AI-driven alerts, suspicious event replay, movement comparisons, and training on a vast dataset of normal and abnormal infant movements far beyond what any provider could witness.

The Neonatal Neurological Observation with Video AI (NeoNOVA) study is a multi-site, prospective, single-arm, pragmatic, silent observational study to evaluate the performance of NeoPose and AI-derived insights in real world settings. NeoNOVA will deploy a bedside video monitoring system (ArtemisAI Platform) that continuously, passively video records the subject from enrollment to discharge. The study will prospectively validate the AI system's tracking accuracy against ground-truth human-labeled video frames (primary objective; outcome median position error in pixels), will evaluate the association between a video-derived movement index and standardized bedside assessments of encephalopathy, pain, and sedation (secondary objective; outcomes N-PASS and modified Sarnat scales), and will support hypothesis-generating research on novel video prediction algorithms for outcomes like sepsis and need for respiratory support (tertiary objective). The study operates in "silent mode," where AI outputs are not shown to the patient's clinical team. Findings are intended to support a structured clinical evidence generation plan for a Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) designed for continuous, non-contact neurological monitoring in the NICU.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Weill Cornell Medicine / NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sushma Krishna, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Neonates of any sex, gestational age, demographic background, or health status admitted to newborn services, including the NICU, at a participating hospital. No diagnosis-specific criteria apply. Consent is provided by at least one parent or legally authorized representative aged 18 or older. Sites will make reasonable efforts to enroll a demographically diverse sample reflective of their local NICU populations, supporting prespecified subgroup analyses of AI performance consistency across gestational age, race/ethnicity, sex, and clinical condition. The first five participants at each site are excluded from primary and secondary endpoint analyses and serve as a technology familiarization cohort.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed and dated informed consent from at least one parent or legally authorized representative (LAR) who is at least 18 years old.
  • Parent/LAR expresses willingness to comply with study procedures for the duration of the infant's hospital stay.
  • Infant of any sex (including intersex/undetermined) admitted to newborn services (including the NICU) at a participating hospital.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parents or LAR unable to provide informed consent or are under the age of 18.
  • Non-viable neonates

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
NICU-Admitted Infants Undergoing Continuous Video Monitoring
Infants admitted to newborn services, including the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), who meet eligibility criteria and undergo continuous, non-contact bedside video monitoring from enrollment until hospital discharge.
A non-contact, passive bedside video recording system is mounted adjacent to the infant's crib or incubator. The device continuously captures video data from enrollment to hospital discharge or withdrawal. The device runs AI models to track infant anatomic landmarks and calculate a continuous movement index. The trial runs in "silent mode," where AI outputs are not shown to the patient's clinical team and do not influence care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AI Anatomic Landmark Tracking Accuracy
Time Frame: At study completion, an average of 1 week.
The primary endpoint is analytical performance of the AI pose estimation system, quantified as median position error (in pixels) between AI-predicted and human-labeled anatomic landmark positions extracted from continuous bedside video. Success is defined as median position error less than typical human inter-rater variability.
At study completion, an average of 1 week.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Movement Index - Encephalopathy measured by modified Sarnat exam
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 week.
Association between a video-derived movement index and encephalopathy classification of severity from the modified Sarnat exam score, a bedside neurological exam assessed by trained clinical staff.
Through study completion, an average of 1 week.
Movement Index - N-PASS
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 week.
Association between a video-derived movement index and Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale (N-PASS) score (ordinal outcome), a bedside neurological exam measuring pain/sedation and assessed by trained clinical staff.
Through study completion, an average of 1 week.
Movement Index - Sedative Exposure
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 week.
Association between movement index and sedative exposure, a routinely collected clinical variable that influences neonatal arousal.
Through study completion, an average of 1 week.
Movement Index - Chronological Age at Video
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 week.
Association between movement index and chronological age at video, a routinely collected clinical variable that influences neonatal arousal.
Through study completion, an average of 1 week.
Movement Index - Gestational age at birth
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 week.
Association between the movement index and gestational age at birth, a routinely collected clinical variable that influences neonatal arousal.
Through study completion, an average of 1 week.
Movement Index - Sleep state
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 week.
Association between the movement index and sleep state, a routinely collected clinical variable that influences neonatal arousal.
Through study completion, an average of 1 week.
Movement Index - EEG evidence of cerebral dysfunction
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 week.
Association between the movement index and, if obtained as part of routine clinical care, EEG evidence of cerebral dysfunction (a biomarker of encephalopathy).
Through study completion, an average of 1 week.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AI Anatomic Landmark Tracking - Post-Menstrual Age at Video
Time Frame: At study completion, an average of 1 week.
Assess performance of AI anatomic landmark tracking (median position error) across post-menstrual ages at the time of video recording.
At study completion, an average of 1 week.
AI Anatomic Landmark Tracking - Encephalopathy Status
Time Frame: At study completion, an average of 1 week.
Assess performance of AI anatomic landmark tracking (median position error) across encephalopathy statuses.
At study completion, an average of 1 week.
AI Anatomic Landmark Tracking - Caregiver-reported Race/Ethnicity
Time Frame: At study completion, an average of 1 week.
Assess performance of AI anatomic landmark tracking (median position error) across caregiver-reported race/ethnicity.
At study completion, an average of 1 week.
AI Anatomic Landmark Tracking - Sex
Time Frame: At study completion, an average of 1 week.
Assess performance of AI anatomic landmark tracking (median position error) and sex.
At study completion, an average of 1 week.
AI Anatomic Landmark Tracking - Lighting Conditions
Time Frame: At study completion, an average of 1 week.
Assess performance of AI anatomic landmark tracking (median position error) and lighting conditions (phototherapy, lights on/off, time of day).
At study completion, an average of 1 week.
Parent and Provider Feedback
Time Frame: At baseline and study completion (Day 1 - Day 7, on average).
Brief structured surveys administered to parents and clinical providers to assess acceptability, usability, and perceived burden of the bedside video monitoring system. Findings will inform system design refinements and support future bedside adoption and regulatory human factors documentation.
At baseline and study completion (Day 1 - Day 7, on average).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Benjamin Glicksberg, PhD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Aggregate deidentified data and results will be shared. Individual participant video data will not be shared due to PHI concerns.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sleep

Clinical Trials on Continuous bedside video monitoring with AI anatomic landmark tracking for neurologic monitoring

Subscribe