Optimizing Participation In Colorectal Cancer Screening By Direct Invitation Of Non Responders By General Practitionners (OPTIDEC COLO)

June 5, 2026 updated by: MSPU des 3 Provinces

Optimizing Participation In Colorectal Cancer Screening By Direct Invitation Of Non Responders By General Practitionners: A Randomized Controlled Cluster Trial

The goal of this randomized trial is to assess the effectiveness of a targeted telephone reminder strategy, implemented by the patient's general practitioner, in enhancing participation in colorectal cancer screening among individuals who are not up to date . The participants are patients between 50 to 74 years old as they are the target for colorectal cancer screening. The main questions are:

  • What is the percentage of patients who completed the colorectal cancer screening test during the intervention year , within the patient population of general practitioners participating in the study and identified as non-up-to-date for their screening status ?
  • Identifying potential factors influencing the effectiveness of the intervention based on various characteristics of the patient, the geographical area, the general practitioner, and the caller

Researchers will compare with other patients who are not up to date without the intervention of their general practionner with a telephone reminder.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

10000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Franche-comté
      • Champlitte, Franche-comté, France
        • MSPU des 3 provinces
        • Principal Investigator:
          • José-Philippe MORENO, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria for general practionners :

  • Practise in one of the four departments of the Franche-Comté region; ractise in a solo practice, group practice, multidisciplinary primary care centre , or community health centre;
  • Are engaged in general medical practice.
  • Have agreed to participate in the study.

Inclusion Criteria for patients :

  • patients within the practice population of general practitioners selected to participate in the study;
  • aged between 50 and 75 years inclusive;
  • affiliated with the French general health insurance scheme or the agricultural social insurance scheme

Exclusion Criteria for general practionners:

  • practise exclusively in a specialty other than general practice (e.g. osteopathy, allergology, vascular medicine).

Non inclusion Criteria for patients :

- Objection expressed by the patient to the change in the purpose of data processing for research purposes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Arm : phone-based outreach to promote colorectal cancer screening
In year n, the 50 selected general practitioners will receive from the national health insurance a list of patients who are not up to date with colorectal cancer screening. Each patient's screening status will be verified by the clinical research associate through a review of the medical records. A telephone call will be made by a member of the patient's primary care team.
A telephone call will be made by a member of the patient's primary care team (general practitioner, medical secretary, public health nurse, or care coordinator), with priority given to a call by the patient's general practitioner. The call should preferably be made to the patient's mobile phone. If the call is unsuccessful, a voicemail message will be left, and a second call will be attempted within the following seven days. The voicemail message will include the name of the patient's general practitioner, the purpose of the call regarding colorectal cancer screening, and notification that a further attempt will be made to reach the patient. If the telephone exchange is successful, an appointment at the healthcare facility will be offered to the patient, during which the screening test will be offered to the patient, during which the screening test will be handed over and explained by one of the healthcare professionals from the same facility.
No Intervention: Control arm
In year n, the 50 selected general practitioners will receive from the national health insurance a list of patients who are not up to date with colorectal cancer screening. Each patient's screening status will be verified by the clinical research associate through a review of the medical records. There will not be an intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients who completed the colorectal cancer screening in each arms
Time Frame: 6 months after inclusion

Patients who completed the colorectal cancer screening test during the intervention year (year n), within the patient population of general practitioners participating in the study, and who were identified from the national health insurance list as not up to date with screening - a status that was confirmed by reviewing their medical records.

Completion of the screening will be confirmed by the presence of the test result in the patient's medical record within the General practionner's practice software, no later than three months after the end of the intervention.

This mesure will be done in each arm.

6 months after inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients whose colorectal cancer screening status was updated according to the National Health Insurance database
Time Frame: 1 year after enrollment

Patients whose colorectal cancer screening status changed between the list received from National Health in year n and the list received in year n+1.

A change in status will be confirmed by the absence of the patient from the n+1 list, among those still registered within the general practitioner's patient panel.

1 year after enrollment
Number of patients who completed the colorectal cancer screening in the intervention arm according differents variables
Time Frame: 3 months after the end of enrollment

Patients who completed the colorectal cancer screening (CRC) test during the intervention year , within the patient population of general practitioners participating in the study, and who were identified from the national health insurance list as not up to date with screening. This proportion will be analysed according to the following stratification variables:

  • Patient-related variables: age, sex
  • Territorial variables: level of urbanisation, deprivation index, participation rate in CRC screening in 2023
  • General practionner-related variables: age, sex, solo vs group practice
  • Caller status: profession of the person who made the call
3 months after the end of enrollment
Number of participants per stage of the intervention process
Time Frame: 3 months after the end of enrollment

In both study arms, identification of patients incorrectly included in the national health insurance list (i.e. patients already up to date with screening, those excluded from CRC screening, those under or awaiting colonoscopic follow-up, or currently undergoing treatment for colorectal cancer).

For the intervention arm, classification of all patients according to the following outcomes:

  • Patients contacted
  • Patients who refused screening
  • Patients who accepted to participate
  • Patients who attended the healthcare facility to collect the screening kit
  • Patients for whom the test result was received by the general practitioner
3 months after the end of enrollment
quantifying the time required to carry out the intervention
Time Frame: 3 months after the end of the enrollment

In the intervention arm, time spent on all stages of the intervention:

  • Processing the Assurance Maladie list
  • Making telephone calls
  • Patient follow-up
3 months after the end of the enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 10, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2025-A01370-49

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colorectal Cancer Screening

Clinical Trials on Intervention

Subscribe