Clinical Performance of AH Plus Jet® Root Canal Sealers in Single-cone Protocols

A Prospective, Parallel-group, Randomized Clinical Investigation Evaluating Performance and Safety of the AH Plus Jet® Sealing Materials Used in Single-cone Technique for Single Visit Endodontic Treatment. A 2-year Follow-up Study

A prospective, parallel-group, randomised, post-market clinical follow-up investigation evaluating the performance and safety of the modified formula of the AH Plus Jet® Endodontic Sealer (also referred to as ES) and the predicate AH Plus Jet® Root Canal Sealing material (also referred to as RCS). Around 150 teeth will be randomly assigned to receive either ES or RCS root canal treatment using the single-cone technique. A maximum of 2 teeth per subject will be included and "tooth" will be considered the statistical unit and hence considered independent even if they are in the same subject. They will be followed up for a period of 24 months to assess the outcomes.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

130

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10010
        • New York University College of Dentistry
        • Contact:
          • Matthew Malek

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult aged 18-75 at time of informed consent.
  2. Subject willing to participate in the clinical investigation and able to understand the content of the clinical investigation.
  3. Subject willing to return for follow-up visits.
  4. Subject has signed and dated the informed consent form.
  5. Subject in need of one or two primary root canal treatment on mature permanent anterior (incisor or canine) or premolar tooth.
  6. Planned study tooth has a favorable prognosis for the next 2 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of allergic reaction to epoxy resins or amines or any of the other product components.
  2. Subject has significant systemic health issues or chronic conditions (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 3-6).
  3. Known pregnancy or is breastfeeding at time of enrolment or at the RCT visit.
  4. Subject unlikely to comply with investigational procedures, as judged by the Investigator.
  5. Sign of sinus tract or gingival swelling in the planned study position.
  6. Previous enrolment in the present clinical investigation.
  7. Involvement in the planning and conduct of the clinical investigation (applies to both Dentsply Sirona personnel and the clinical investigation site).
  8. Participation in another clinical investigation that may interfere with the present clinical investigation.
  9. Subject experiencing an intraoperative condition that may interfere with the evaluation of the investigational root canal sealer.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Investigation medical Device 1 (IMD1)
Endodontic sealer material with a modified formula compared to the predicate.

AH Plus® endodontic sealer is a class IIa medical device used for permanent obturation of root canals of teeth of the secondary dentition in combination with root canal points, for subjects in need of endodontic treatment to restore a tooth.

AH Plus Jet® Endodontic Sealer has similar intended use and the same indications for use as the predicate Root Canal Sealer (AH Plus Jet® Root Canal Sealing Material). However, there are minor differences in the technological characteristics.

Active Comparator: Investigation medical Device 2 (IMD2)
Predicate endodontic sealer material.

AH Plus® endodontic sealer is a class IIa medical device used for permanent obturation of root canals of teeth of the secondary dentition in combination with root canal points, for subjects in need of endodontic treatment to restore a tooth.

AH Plus Jet® Root Canal Sealing Material is a predicate to AH Plus Jet® Endodontic Sealer.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Endodontic treatment success
Time Frame: At 1 year after Root Canal Treatment (RCT) visit (RCT visit conducted a maximum 2 months after day 0).

Endodontic treatment success according to loose criteria after 1 year, defined as "Tooth with successful endodontic treatment according to loose criteria (Yes/No)".

The endodontic treatment is considered a failure according to the loose criteria under any of the following criteria:

  • Need for intervention due to pain to percussion, palpation, or bite tests compared to the nearest contralateral tooth.
  • Sign of a swelling.
  • Sign of a sinus tract.
  • Unchanged or increased size or score of the radiolucent pathology on the radiograph.
At 1 year after Root Canal Treatment (RCT) visit (RCT visit conducted a maximum 2 months after day 0).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Endodontic treatment success
Time Frame: At 6 months and 2 years after RCT visit (RCT visit conducted a maximum 2 months after day 0).

Endodontic treatment success according to loose criteria after 6 months and 2 years, defined as "Tooth with successful endodontic treatment according to loose criteria (Yes/No)".

The endodontic treatment is considered a failure according to the loose criteria under any of the following criteria:

  • Need for intervention due to pain to percussion, palpation, or bite tests compared to the nearest contralateral tooth.
  • Sign of a swelling.
  • Sign of a sinus tract.
  • Unchanged or increased size or score of the radiolucent pathology on the radiograph.
At 6 months and 2 years after RCT visit (RCT visit conducted a maximum 2 months after day 0).
Endodontic treatment success
Time Frame: At 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after RCT visit (RCT visit conducted a maximum 2 months after day 0).

Endodontic treatment success according to strict criteria after 6 months, 1 and 2 years.

The endodontic treatment is considered a failure according to the strict criteria under any of the following criteria:

  • Need for intervention due to pain to percussion, palpation, or bite tests compared to the nearest contralateral tooth.
  • Sign of a swelling.
  • Sign of a sinus tract.
  • Periapical index (PAI) score >2.
  • Radiolucent pathology visible on radiograph.
At 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after RCT visit (RCT visit conducted a maximum 2 months after day 0).
Intensity of patient-reported short-term post-operative pain
Time Frame: At 7 days +/- 3 days after RCT visit (RCT visit conducted a maximum 2 months after day 0).
Short-term self-reported post-operative pain level of study tooth using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst possible pain.
At 7 days +/- 3 days after RCT visit (RCT visit conducted a maximum 2 months after day 0).
Correlation between coping strategy scores and patient-reported short-term post-operative pain intensity levels - Active coping.
Time Frame: At RCT visit and at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after RCT visit (RCT visit conducted a maximum 2 months after day 0).

Patient completed questionnaire consisting of 27 questions. The patient will have an option to select a number between 0-6 in response to each question where a 0 indicates you never do that when you experience pain, a 3 indicates you sometimes do that when you experience pain, and a 6 indicates you always do it when you are experiencing pain. The scores will be categorized into mean values resulting in "active coping" or "passive coping" as listed below and will be correlated to patient-reported short-term post-operative pain intensity levels.

Active Coping is the mean of the following categories; Diverting Attention (questions 2, 15, 16, 25 and 26), Reinterpreting Pain Sensations (questions 1, 9, 18 and 27), Coping Statements (questions 4, 5, 11 and 20), and Ignoring Pain Sensations (questions 10, 12, 13, 19 and 22).

At RCT visit and at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after RCT visit (RCT visit conducted a maximum 2 months after day 0).
Correlation between coping strategy scores and patient-reported short-term post-operative pain intensity levels - Passive coping.
Time Frame: At RCT visit and at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after RCT visit (RCT visit conducted a maximum 2 months after day 0).

Patient completed questionnaire consisting of 27 questions. The patient will have an option to select a number between 0-6 in response to each question where a 0 indicates you never do that when you experience pain, a 3 indicates you sometimes do that when you experience pain, and a 6 indicates you always do it when you are experiencing pain. The scores will be categorized into mean values resulting in "active coping" or "passive coping" as listed below and will be correlated to patient-reported short-term post-operative pain intensity levels.

Passive Coping is the mean of the following categories; Praying & Hoping (questions 8, 17 and 23) and Catastrophizing (questions 3, 6, 7, 14, 21 and 24).

At RCT visit and at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after RCT visit (RCT visit conducted a maximum 2 months after day 0).
Occurrence of Adverse Events, Adverse Device Effects, and Device Deficiencies during the clinical investigation.
Time Frame: From Day 0 up to completion of the 2-year follow-up visit, on average 2 years and 2 months.
Adverse Events, Adverse Device Effects, and Device Deficiencies spontaneously reported, and collection at each clinical investigation visit.
From Day 0 up to completion of the 2-year follow-up visit, on average 2 years and 2 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • C-EN-24-019

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Root Canal Treatment

Clinical Trials on AH Plus Jet® Endodontic Sealer

Subscribe