Evaluation of the Impact of Periodontitis and Its Treatment on Swallowing Functions and Oral Quality of Life (FI-PAROCROC)

June 11, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

The objective of this single-center prospective study is to evaluate the impact of periodontal treatment on masticatory performance in patients with periodontitis.

Participants will be asked to complete several questionnaires related to their oral health and quality of life. Functional masticatory tests and salivary flow measurements will also be performed.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The questionnaires administered are as follows:

  • the EAT-10 (Eating Assessment Tool), used to assess swallowing disorders and the patient's perception of oropharyngeal dysphagia;
  • the XI (Xerostomia Inventory), used to evaluate xerostomia;
  • the GOHAI (General Oral Health Assessment Index), used to assess the impact of oral health status on patients' quality of life.

The functional test (masticatory performance "chewing gum" test) will be performed at each visit if applicable (T0, T1, T2) to evaluate the impact of periodontal treatment on masticatory function. The two-colour chewing gum test is a commonly used method for assessing masticatory mixing ability.

Saliva collection for salivary flow analysis will also be performed at each follow-up visit in order to evaluate the impact of periodontal treatment on salivary function.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients treated at the university hospital and diagnosed with periodontitis
  • Adult patients who have provided informed consent
  • Patients enrolled in a social security system
  • Patients who speak and understand French.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Minors
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
  • Patients under legal protection or conservatorship
  • Patients who refuse to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Periodontisis
Patients diagnosed with periodontitis will receive standard non-surgical periodontal treatment as part of routine care. Clinical and functional assessments will be performed at baseline (T0) and during follow-up visits (T1, T2) to evaluate changes in masticatory performance, salivary flow, and oral health-related quality of life.
Administration of questionnaires, functional masticatory test, and saliva collection.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The patient's masticatory performance score
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)
The patient's masticatory performance score, obtained from the masticatory performance test (two-color chewing gum test) (quantitative variable).
Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity of periodontal disease assessed by stage.
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)

Periodontitis is defined according to two criteria: grade and stage. The latter is used to characterize the severity of periodontal involvement.

The stage of periodontitis is determined according to a four-level classification system, ranging from Stage 1 (low) to Stage 4 (high).

Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)
Salivation
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)
Salivary flow is measured by collecting saliva at rest and after stimulation in mL/min. Stimulated salivary flow is assessed after chewing paraffin for 1 minute. The XI questionnaire (Xerostomia Inventory), proposed by Thomson et al. and validated in French, will also be administered (6,7). The XI consists of 11 items. Each item is scored on a scale of 1 to 5 to indicate how frequently the described situation occurs for the patient. The scores for each item are added together to yield a total score ranging from 11 (no dry mouth) to 55 (extreme dry mouth).
Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)
Swallowing
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)
Oropharyngeal dysphagia is assessed using the EAT-10 (Eating Assessment Tool) questionnaire, which has been validated in French. The questionnaire comprises 10 items designed to assess swallowing disorders and the patient's perception of oropharyngeal dysphagia. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (no difficulty) to 4 (severe difficulty), resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 40. A total score of 3 or higher indicates difficulty swallowing safely.
Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)
Periodontitis grade (Chicago Classification)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)
Grade of periodontitis according to the Chicago Classification. Categorical (Grade A (low) to C (fast) or as defined by classification)
Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)
Gingival recessions
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)
Measurement of gingival recession depth. Unit of Measure : Millimeters (mm)
Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)
Plaque Index
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)

Plaque accumulation assessed using a validated plaque index (specify full name of index).

Unit of Measure: Score (range: specify minimum and maximum values of the scale) Interpretation: Higher scores indicate worse oral hygiene status.

Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)
Edentulism
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)
Presence or absence of edentulism.
Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)
Bleeding on Probing (BOP)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)
Percentage (%) of sites showing bleeding on probing.
Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)
Pocket Depth
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)
Periodontal probing depth. Unit of Measure: Millimeters (mm)
Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)
Tooth Mobility
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)

Tooth mobility assessed using the Miller classification (Grade 0-3). Higher scores indicate greater mobility and worse periodontal condition.

Unit of Measure: Millimeters (mm)

Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)
Number of Posterior Functional Dental Units
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)
Count of posterior functional dental units. Unit of Measure: Millimeters (mm)
Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)
Oral quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)
The French version of the GOHAI (General Oral Health Assessment Index) questionnaire is used to assess the impact of oral health on participants' quality of life (10,11). The GOHAI consists of 12 items divided into 3 subgroups: a group related to the functional domain (items 1, 2, 3, and 4), a group related to the psychosocial domain (items 6, 7, 9, 10, and 11), and a group related to pain and discomfort (items 5, 8, and 12). Each question is scored on a scale of 1 to 5. The maximum score is 60. The higher the score, the better the quality of life: a score of 57 to 60 corresponds to a satisfactory oral health-related quality of life; a score between 51 and 56 corresponds to an average quality of life; and a score below 50 corresponds to poor oral health.
Baseline (T0), T1 (T0 + 3 month), T2 (end of treatment if complementary treatments are required, assessed no later than 1 year after the start of the initial treatment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RBHP 2026 DOUILLARD

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Functionnal test

Subscribe