Evaluation of Functionnal ElectromyoStimulation on Leg In Advanced Chronic Heart Failure After Hospitalisation for Acute Decompensation (EMSICA)

May 10, 2017 updated by: University Hospital, Toulouse
The purpose of the study is to test the efficacy of the Functionnal ElectromyoStimulation (FES) of lower limbs in advanced chronic heart failure. The hypothesis is that FES treatment could improve functional exercise capacity.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Advanced Chronic Heart Failure (ACHF) is a severe and frequent disease inducing a strong limitation of exercise capacity and a poor quality of life. Hospitalisation for cardiac decompensation is frequent and could alter their incapacities because of muscular deconditionning. Tradionnal aerobic rehabilitation exercises fighting against this deconditionning are not relevant in these patients because of dyspnea.

In litterature, Functionnal Electrostimulation (FES) has been tested in stable Chronic Heart Failure (NYHA I to III), far from decompensation. Several authors showed the same improvements than those obtained with conventionnal rehabilitation on aerobic capacities (peak VO2, 6 minutes walking test) and quality of life.

The originality of this study is to test FES soon after acute heart decompensation in ACHF patients. This type of rehabilitation could represent in the future an alternative to conventionnal rehabilitation until the patients could be able to do aerobic exercise.

60 patients will be randomised between two groups, the firsth receiving FES (treatment group), the second receiving skin electrostimulation in the same place without muscular contraction (Sham group). Patient and evaluator do not know what type of stimulation they have. These treatments spread over six weeks, five days per seven. They are began in rehabilitation unit then continued at home.

The principal criteria of judgement of FES efficacy is peak VO2 after the protocol. Secondary criteria are distance to the six minutes walking test, muscular strengh of quadriceps, the muscle mass measured by Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), inflamatory dosage (TNF alpha, IL-1, IL-6, CRP), rest value of Muscle sympathetic nerve activity, score to Minnesota questionnaire and fuctionnal independance.

The attempted results are an significative improvement of aerobic capacity(peak VO2 and six minutes walking test) and the others secondary criteria in FES group compared with Sham group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • Universty Hospital Toulouse Cardiology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Advanced Chronic Heart Failure (NYHA III to IV)
  • Cardiac Ejection Fraction < 40 %
  • peak VO2 < 16 ml/kg/min,
  • optimal drug treatment of CHF,
  • hospitalised for acute decompensation but not in intensive care

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with FEV < 50%,
  • History of stroke with walking disability, dementia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Functionnal ElectroStimulation (FES)
Functionnal ElectroStimulation on lower limbs, 1h per day, 5 days per 7, during 6 weeks
Sham Comparator: SHAM
SHAM on lower limbs, 1h per day, 5 days per 7, during 6 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
VO2 peak
Time Frame: change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation
change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Muscle nerve sympathetic activity (MSNA)
Time Frame: change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation
change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation
Six minutes walking test
Time Frame: change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation
change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation
DEXA
Time Frame: change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation
change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation
maximal quadriceps strengh
Time Frame: change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation
change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation
interleukin 1
Time Frame: change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation
change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation
interleukin 6
Time Frame: change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation
change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation
TNF alpha
Time Frame: change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation
change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation
CRP
Time Frame: change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation
change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation
BNP
Time Frame: change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation
change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation
score of minessota test
Time Frame: change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation
change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation
score of Functional independency measure
Time Frame: change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation
change between baseline and 60 days after the Functional Electromyo Stimulation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michel GALINIER, MD, PhD, University Hospital, Toulouse

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 8, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0730502
  • 2008-A00330-55 (Other Identifier: Afssaps)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Functionnal ElectroStimulation (FES)

Subscribe