Use of a Mobile Brain-Body Imaging Approach to Evaluate the Effects of Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation on Gait and Brain Function in Alzheimer's Disease

June 17, 2026 updated by: Lou Awad, PT, DPT, PhD, Boston University Charles River Campus
Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is associated with impairments in both gait and cognition, significantly increasing fall risk. Falls are a leading cause of injury-related disability in older adults, and individuals with AD experience a nearly threefold higher rate of falls compared to neurotypical older adults. There is an urgent need for fall prevention interventions tailored to the unique deficits of individuals with AD. Converging evidence suggests that interventions aiming to reduce fall risk in AD should target both gait and cognition. Rhythmic music interventions, such as Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS) can harness global brain activation and auditory-motor entrainment to facilitate high-intensity exercise to alleviate AD-related neurocognitive and gait dysfunction. This study aims to assess the neural correlates of gait dysfunction in people with AD, evaluate if baseline neurocognitive impairment is predictive of the effects of RAS, and evaluate RAS benefits for individuals with AD.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

  1. Background and Scientific Rationale: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the accumulation of amyloid-beta plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles, leading to widespread cortical and subcortical atrophy. While memory impairment is the most recognized clinical feature, AD also profoundly disrupts motor systems - particularly gait - through degeneration of frontal-subcortical circuits that govern attentional control of movement. Gait deficits in AD include reduced speed, shortened stride length, increased stride variability, and disproportionate cognitive-motor interference during dual-task conditions. These impairments reflect underlying disruptions in prefrontal-motor connectivity and are strongly predictive of fall events.

    Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS) is an interventional technique that harnesses the coupling between the auditory and motor systems. Rhythmic auditory cues delivered as an isochronous beat (with or without music) activate auditory-motor entrainment pathways, recruiting motor planning circuits in the basal ganglia, supplementary motor area, and cerebellum to promote more stable and efficient gait. RAS has demonstrated efficacy in improving gait parameters in neurological populations including Parkinson's disease and stroke. Its application in AD is motivated by evidence that music-based rhythmic stimuli elicit broad, cross-regional brain activation, including areas relatively spared in early AD, and may therefore provide a viable sensory scaffold for augmenting motor control even as cognitive reserve declines.

  2. Study Design and Overview: This is a single-session, non-randomized clinical trial enrolling 40 subjects -- 20 adults with a clinical diagnosis of AD (restricted to mild cognitive impairment, MCI) and 20 neurotypical older adults serving as a healthy comparison group. All participants complete one study visit conducted at the Boston University Neuromotor Recovery Laboratory (NRL) and/or affiliated BU clinical research facilities.
  3. Specific Aims

    The study pursues three primary aims:

    1. To characterize the neural correlates of gait dysfunction in people with AD using simultaneous brain-body imaging during walking under typical and challenging conditions.
    2. To evaluate whether baseline neurocognitive profile (degree and domain of impairment) predicts individual responsiveness to RAS during walking.
    3. To quantify the acute effects of RAS on gait and functional brain connectivity in individuals with AD compared to neurotypical older adults.
  4. Measurement Framework & Outcome Measures: Mobile Brain-Body Imaging (MoBI): A defining feature of this study is the use of a Mobile Brain-Body Imaging (MoBI) framework consisting of the concurrent capture of neural and biomechanical data during real-time ambulation. Brain activity is measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), a non-invasive optical neuroimaging technique that quantifies changes in cortical hemodynamics (oxy- and deoxy-hemoglobin concentration) as a proxy for regional neural activation. Unlike traditional neuroimaging modalities, fNIRS is tolerant of movement artifact, making it well-suited for ambulatory paradigms. Biomechanical gait data are collected concurrently using inertial measurement units (IMUs).
  5. Walking Conditions: Participants will walk overground under multiple conditions designed to vary cognitive and sensorimotor demand: a) walking with and without RAS and b) walking on an altered, gait-destablizing surface (foam mat or rocker-bottom footwear) to increase sensorimotor challenge. These conditions are intended to elicit a gradient of gait and neural responses and to probe the extent to which RAS can attenuate dual-task interference and cognitive-motor coupling deficits characteristic of AD.
  6. Cognitive Assessment: A standardized neuropsychological battery will be administered to all participants with AD to characterize baseline cognitive status and confirm MCI diagnosis. This battery includes the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE), Consortium to Establish a Registry in Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) delayed recall, Boston Naming Test (short form), Trail Making Test A and B, and verbal fluency measures. These assessments will be used to examine relationships between neurocognitive impairment profile and the magnitude of RAS benefit observed during walking.
  7. Significance: This study will generate foundational data linking neural mechanisms of gait dysfunction in AD with behavioral responsiveness to an accessible, non-pharmacological auditory-motor intervention in a population at high fall risk and with limited therapeutic options. Findings are intended to inform participant selection criteria and outcome measure development for future RAS-based clinical trials targeting fall prevention in AD.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Regina Sloutsky, PT, DPT, PhD
  • Phone Number: 617-500-3645
  • Email: reginas@bu.edu

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Louis N Awad, PT, DPT, PhD
  • Phone Number: 617-500-3645
  • Email: louawad@bu.edu

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Recruiting
        • Boston University Neuromotor Recovery Laboratory
        • Contact:
          • Louis N Awad, PT, DPT, PhD
          • Phone Number: 617-500-3645
          • Email: gaitlab@bu.edu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

General Inclusion (both healthy and AD populations):

  • Community-dwelling
  • Capable of walking short community distances (approximately 10-15 minutes at a time) without assistance from another person or a device (such as a cane).
  • Able to communicate with researchers
  • Age 50-90 (inclusive)

Population-specific Inclusion criteria:

  • Healthy -

    • No diagnosis of AD
  • AD population-

CERAD score of <1.5 SD from age + education adjusted norms on delayed recall domain or one or more other cognitive domains (i.e. language, attention).

MoCA score between 20-30 MMSE score between 25-30

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of significant hearing impairment
  • Current orthopedic, neurologic or other medical condition that limits the ability to walk.

The MOCA, MMSE and CERAD tests will be completed in-person after the participant consents into the study. If the participant is determined to be ineligible based on their performance on these tests (compared to inclusion requirements listed above), they will be informed that they are not eligible for this study and the study visit will be cancelled. They will then be withdrawn from the study; their clinical tests and study documentation will be maintained for the purposes of completeness, but will not be used for any study analyses.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Effects of RAS on gait quality on brain activity in individuals with and without AD
Participants will complete overground walking assessments with and without rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) under varying sensorimotor conditions while gait and cortical activity are measured using wearable sensors (IMUs) and portable neuroimaging (fNIRS).
Rhythmic Auditory stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional brain network connectivity
Time Frame: within session: baseline (no RAS) and RAS-assisted walking
Functional connectivity between the Dorsal Attention Network and Default Mode Network measured using fNIRS during walking.
within session: baseline (no RAS) and RAS-assisted walking
Stride time variability
Time Frame: within session: baseline (no RAS) and RAS-assisted walking
Variability in stride timing measured using inertial measurement units during walking.
within session: baseline (no RAS) and RAS-assisted walking
Gait speed
Time Frame: within session: baseline (no RAS) and RAS-assisted walking
Average walking speed measured in meters per second during overground walking.
within session: baseline (no RAS) and RAS-assisted walking

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Louis N Awad, PT, DPT, PhD, Boston University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in publications arising from this study will be made available. Shared data may include participant demographics, clinical characteristics, gait and biomechanical measures, neurophysiological measures, metronome settings for delivery of RAS, and other study variables necessary to reproduce published findings. Data will be de-identified prior to sharing in accordance with applicable regulations and institutional policies.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will become available following publication of the primary study results or within 12 months of study completion, whichever occurs first, and will remain available for at least 5 years thereafter.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

De-identified data and supporting documentation will be made available to qualified researchers for scientifically sound research purposes. Requests will be reviewed by the study investigators and may require a data use agreement. Access will be provided in accordance with participant consent, institutional policies, and applicable regulations.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)

Clinical Trials on Metronome

Subscribe