Comparison of the Quality of CPR by Lay Rescuers With and Without Feedback Devices (frequenz)

May 2, 2015 updated by: Dr. med. Stefan Braunecker, University Hospital of Cologne

Comparison of the Quality of CPR by Lay Rescuers With and Without Telephone Instructions by a Simulated Rescue Coordination Center

Comparison of various methods to improve the quality of CPR

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Even for paramedics and emergency physicians, the resuscitation of patients with cardiac arrest remains a challenge. Previous studies have shown that the cardiac output varies widely even among professional helpers. This is especially due to some very different mean frequencies of cardiac compression wich vary from 60 to 160/min for paramedics. Aim of this study is to investigate whether the use of feedback-devices during cardiac-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can lead to an improvement of the cardiac output and may improve survival.

For this, we examine the impact of different feedback-methods on the frequence-variety on manikin by lay rescuers. Overall, we compare three different devices for feedback during CPR. The subjects for this study are lay rescuers who perform a 5 minute chest-compression-only CPR.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

240

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Köln, Germany, 50937
        • Recruiting
        • Uniklinik Koln
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jochen Hinkelbein, MD
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Stefan Braunecker, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • lay rescuers
  • >18 years
  • <60 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • professional rescuers
  • pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
5 minutes chest-compression-only CPR, without any support
Experimental: PocketCPR
5 minutes chest-compression-only CPR, with support
5 minutes chest-compression-only CPR, using Zoll PocketCPR
Experimental: Metronome
5 minutes chest-compression-only CPR, with support
5 minutes chest-compression-only CPR, using a metronome
Experimental: 110bpm Song
5 minutes chest-compression-only CPR, with support
5 minutes chest-compression-only CPR, using a song with 110bpm for support

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The average achieved cardiac output
Time Frame: after 5 minutes
The main goal of the study is the average achieved cardiac output. Data acquisition is carried out on a resuscitation-manikin which can measure compression-rate (CR) and compression-depth (CD). The data are recorded by a computer during the CPR. To calculate the cardiac output, we multiply the average CR [1/min] with the average CD [mm] during the 5 min manikin-resuscitation. The thus obtained average cardiac-output (CO = CR x CD), measured in [mm/min], will be compared in each group.
after 5 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Constancy of the quality of chest-compressions
Time Frame: after 5 minutes
Second objective of the study is the variation of the compression-rate and the compression-depth during the resuscitation. We compare the average compression-rate and compression-depth of the first 30 compressions and the last 30 compression of every participant. As a result, the average standard deviation in each group will be calculated. Afterward, the groups will be compared using the mean deviation of every group. The mean deviation will be measured in +/-[mm] for compression-depth and +/-[1/min] for compression rate.
after 5 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stefan Braunecker, MD, University Hospital Cologne
  • Study Director: Jochen Hinkelbein, MD, University Hospital Cologne

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

December 4, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 5, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 10-333

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Arrest

Clinical Trials on PocketCPR

Subscribe