Efficacy and Safety of Ensartinib Combined With Anlotinib in Lorlatinib-Resistant ALK-Positive NSCLC

June 23, 2026 updated by: Qiming Wang

Efficacy and Safety of Ensartinib Combined With Anlotinib in Lorlatinib-Resistant ALK-Positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer(NSCLC): An Exploratory Analysis

ALK TKIs, particularly second- and third-generation ALK TKIs, have significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, patients continue to face challenges related to drug resistance and disease progression; in the CROWN study, 40% of patients still experienced disease progression within five years. There are currently no standard treatment recommendations for this patient population. This study retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of ensartinib combined with anlotinib as a second-line treatment in patients who had developed resistance to lorlatinib. The inclusion criteria for data collection were patients aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed stage IIIB-IV ALK-positive NSCLC who had developed resistance to lorlatinib; prior to lorlatinib treatment, patients could have received up to two other ALK-TKIs, excluding ensartinib.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Co-hort 1: Strict co-hort Inclusion criteria1:Histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer; Inclusion criteria2:Age ≥ 18 years at the time of signing the informed consent form; Inclusion criteria3:ALK-positive status confirmed by tissue samples or blood tests at each centre; Inclusion criteria4:History of resistance to lorlatinib treatment; prior use of ensartinib is not permitted; patients must have received a maximum of two other ALK-TKIs; prior receipt of ≤2 courses of chemotherapy is permitted; ECOG Performance Status (PS) score between 0 and 2, with no deterioration within 2 weeks prior to study entry;

Co-hort 2 (Compassionate Use Cohort):

Inclusion criteria1: Resistance to lorlatinib treatment; Inclusion criteria2: No restrictions on prior use of ensartinib or the number of prior lines of other ALK-TKIs and chemotherapy; Inclusion criteria3:Subjects with concomitant leptomeningeal metastases may be enrolled. For patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM), diagnosis must be based on the three criteria outlined in the EANO-ESMO guidelines: clinical presentation, cranial imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid cytology. Tissue samples must not be derived from tumour sites that have previously undergone radiotherapy; however, new lesions arising after local treatment may be included; Inclusion criteria4:ECOG performance status of 0-4; Inclusion criteria5: Adequate organ system function, as determined by the investigator; Inclusion criteria6:All other inclusion criteria are consistent with items 1, 2 and 3 of Cohort 1.

Exclusion criteria1:Concurrent malignant tumours. Exclusion criteria2:Patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM) who are unable to undergo contrast-enhanced MRI.

Exclusion criteria3:Patients who have undergone surgery within 4 weeks prior to treatment with the study drug, except for minor procedures deemed by the investigator not to preclude participation in the trial; or patients scheduled to undergo major surgery during the study period.

Exclusion criteria4:Patients who have experienced a marked deterioration in symptoms or signs within 2 weeks prior to screening and are deemed by the investigator to be unsuitable for participation in the trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Strict Queue
Patients with a performance status (ECOG) score of 0-2 and brain parenchymal metastases were enrolled in Cohort 1.
Ensatinib is administered at a dose of 225 mg once daily, either on an empty stomach or with food; anlotinib is administered at a dose of 10 mg once daily, in 21-day cycles; treatment continues until disease progression, the occurrence of intolerable toxicity, withdrawal at the discretion of the investigator or the subject, loss to follow-up, initiation of other anticancer therapy, or death.
Other: Compassionate Use Cohort
Patients with a performance status (ECOG) score of 0-4 and leptomeningeal metastases were enrolled in Cohort 2 (compassionate use cohort).
Ensatinib is administered at a dose of 225 mg once daily, either on an empty stomach or with food; anlotinib is administered at a dose of 10 mg once daily, in 21-day cycles; treatment continues until disease progression, the occurrence of intolerable toxicity, withdrawal at the discretion of the investigator or the subject, loss to follow-up, initiation of other anticancer therapy, or death.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective response rate (ORR)
Time Frame: After the patients were enrolled according to the inclusion criteria, the tumor assessment will be conducted every 6 weeks, and the maximum duration of the assessment is 6 months until the patients have disease progression or cannot tolerate the treatmen
If the patient has available imaging results from within 28 days prior to the first dose (bone scans may be accepted if performed within 2 months prior to the first dose), repeat imaging is not required. Tumour assessment should be performed every 6 weeks (±4 days) until tumour progression.
After the patients were enrolled according to the inclusion criteria, the tumor assessment will be conducted every 6 weeks, and the maximum duration of the assessment is 6 months until the patients have disease progression or cannot tolerate the treatmen

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS)
Time Frame: The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Progression-free survival (PFS): defined as the time from randomisation to the first occurrence of objective tumour progression or death, whichever comes first.
The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Overall survival (OS): defined as the time from randomisation to the patient's death from any cause.
The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Duration of Response (DOR)
Time Frame: The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Duration of Response (DOR): Defined as the time from the first assessment of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) until the first assessment of disease progression (PD) or death from any cause.
The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time Frame: The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Disease Control Rate (DCR): Defined as the proportion of patients who achieve complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) following treatment and maintain this status for a certain period.
The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Safety assessment
Time Frame: At the end of the first cycle (24 days in each cycle), a safety follow-up (telephone follow-up) was conducted within 28 days after the last administration.
Safety assessment: A summary of patients' physical examinations, electrocardiograms, ECOG scores, vital signs, adverse events and abnormal laboratory test results. All adverse events should be graded for severity in accordance with NCI CTCAE version 4.03.
At the end of the first cycle (24 days in each cycle), a safety follow-up (telephone follow-up) was conducted within 28 days after the last administration.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ALK-positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic (TNM Stage IIIB-IV) Non-small Cell Lung Cancer That Has Developed Resistance to Prior Treatment With Lorlatinib

Clinical Trials on Combined group of ensatinib and arotinib

Subscribe