Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Efficacy and Safety of Ensartinib Combined With Anlotinib in Lorlatinib-Resistant ALK-Positive NSCLC

23 de junho de 2026 atualizado por: Qiming Wang

Efficacy and Safety of Ensartinib Combined With Anlotinib in Lorlatinib-Resistant ALK-Positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer(NSCLC): An Exploratory Analysis

ALK TKIs, particularly second- and third-generation ALK TKIs, have significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, patients continue to face challenges related to drug resistance and disease progression; in the CROWN study, 40% of patients still experienced disease progression within five years. There are currently no standard treatment recommendations for this patient population. This study retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of ensartinib combined with anlotinib as a second-line treatment in patients who had developed resistance to lorlatinib. The inclusion criteria for data collection were patients aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed stage IIIB-IV ALK-positive NSCLC who had developed resistance to lorlatinib; prior to lorlatinib treatment, patients could have received up to two other ALK-TKIs, excluding ensartinib.

Visão geral do estudo

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

80

Estágio

  • Fase 4

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Descrição

Co-hort 1: Strict co-hort Inclusion criteria1:Histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer; Inclusion criteria2:Age ≥ 18 years at the time of signing the informed consent form; Inclusion criteria3:ALK-positive status confirmed by tissue samples or blood tests at each centre; Inclusion criteria4:History of resistance to lorlatinib treatment; prior use of ensartinib is not permitted; patients must have received a maximum of two other ALK-TKIs; prior receipt of ≤2 courses of chemotherapy is permitted; ECOG Performance Status (PS) score between 0 and 2, with no deterioration within 2 weeks prior to study entry;

Co-hort 2 (Compassionate Use Cohort):

Inclusion criteria1: Resistance to lorlatinib treatment; Inclusion criteria2: No restrictions on prior use of ensartinib or the number of prior lines of other ALK-TKIs and chemotherapy; Inclusion criteria3:Subjects with concomitant leptomeningeal metastases may be enrolled. For patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM), diagnosis must be based on the three criteria outlined in the EANO-ESMO guidelines: clinical presentation, cranial imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid cytology. Tissue samples must not be derived from tumour sites that have previously undergone radiotherapy; however, new lesions arising after local treatment may be included; Inclusion criteria4:ECOG performance status of 0-4; Inclusion criteria5: Adequate organ system function, as determined by the investigator; Inclusion criteria6:All other inclusion criteria are consistent with items 1, 2 and 3 of Cohort 1.

Exclusion criteria1:Concurrent malignant tumours. Exclusion criteria2:Patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM) who are unable to undergo contrast-enhanced MRI.

Exclusion criteria3:Patients who have undergone surgery within 4 weeks prior to treatment with the study drug, except for minor procedures deemed by the investigator not to preclude participation in the trial; or patients scheduled to undergo major surgery during the study period.

Exclusion criteria4:Patients who have experienced a marked deterioration in symptoms or signs within 2 weeks prior to screening and are deemed by the investigator to be unsuitable for participation in the trial.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Não randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição de grupo único
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Outro: Strict Queue
Patients with a performance status (ECOG) score of 0-2 and brain parenchymal metastases were enrolled in Cohort 1.
Ensatinib is administered at a dose of 225 mg once daily, either on an empty stomach or with food; anlotinib is administered at a dose of 10 mg once daily, in 21-day cycles; treatment continues until disease progression, the occurrence of intolerable toxicity, withdrawal at the discretion of the investigator or the subject, loss to follow-up, initiation of other anticancer therapy, or death.
Outro: Compassionate Use Cohort
Patients with a performance status (ECOG) score of 0-4 and leptomeningeal metastases were enrolled in Cohort 2 (compassionate use cohort).
Ensatinib is administered at a dose of 225 mg once daily, either on an empty stomach or with food; anlotinib is administered at a dose of 10 mg once daily, in 21-day cycles; treatment continues until disease progression, the occurrence of intolerable toxicity, withdrawal at the discretion of the investigator or the subject, loss to follow-up, initiation of other anticancer therapy, or death.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Objective response rate (ORR)
Prazo: After the patients were enrolled according to the inclusion criteria, the tumor assessment will be conducted every 6 weeks, and the maximum duration of the assessment is 6 months until the patients have disease progression or cannot tolerate the treatmen
If the patient has available imaging results from within 28 days prior to the first dose (bone scans may be accepted if performed within 2 months prior to the first dose), repeat imaging is not required. Tumour assessment should be performed every 6 weeks (±4 days) until tumour progression.
After the patients were enrolled according to the inclusion criteria, the tumor assessment will be conducted every 6 weeks, and the maximum duration of the assessment is 6 months until the patients have disease progression or cannot tolerate the treatmen

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS)
Prazo: The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Progression-free survival (PFS): defined as the time from randomisation to the first occurrence of objective tumour progression or death, whichever comes first.
The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Overall survival (OS)
Prazo: The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Overall survival (OS): defined as the time from randomisation to the patient's death from any cause.
The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Duration of Response (DOR)
Prazo: The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Duration of Response (DOR): Defined as the time from the first assessment of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) until the first assessment of disease progression (PD) or death from any cause.
The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Prazo: The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Disease Control Rate (DCR): Defined as the proportion of patients who achieve complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) following treatment and maintain this status for a certain period.
The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Safety assessment
Prazo: At the end of the first cycle (24 days in each cycle), a safety follow-up (telephone follow-up) was conducted within 28 days after the last administration.
Safety assessment: A summary of patients' physical examinations, electrocardiograms, ECOG scores, vital signs, adverse events and abnormal laboratory test results. All adverse events should be graded for severity in accordance with NCI CTCAE version 4.03.
At the end of the first cycle (24 days in each cycle), a safety follow-up (telephone follow-up) was conducted within 28 days after the last administration.

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

1 de julho de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

31 de dezembro de 2028

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

31 de dezembro de 2028

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

2 de junho de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

23 de junho de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

26 de junho de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

26 de junho de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

23 de junho de 2026

Última verificação

1 de junho de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever