Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Efficacy and Safety of Ensartinib Combined With Anlotinib in Lorlatinib-Resistant ALK-Positive NSCLC

23. Juni 2026 aktualisiert von: Qiming Wang

Efficacy and Safety of Ensartinib Combined With Anlotinib in Lorlatinib-Resistant ALK-Positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer(NSCLC): An Exploratory Analysis

ALK TKIs, particularly second- and third-generation ALK TKIs, have significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, patients continue to face challenges related to drug resistance and disease progression; in the CROWN study, 40% of patients still experienced disease progression within five years. There are currently no standard treatment recommendations for this patient population. This study retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of ensartinib combined with anlotinib as a second-line treatment in patients who had developed resistance to lorlatinib. The inclusion criteria for data collection were patients aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed stage IIIB-IV ALK-positive NSCLC who had developed resistance to lorlatinib; prior to lorlatinib treatment, patients could have received up to two other ALK-TKIs, excluding ensartinib.

Studienübersicht

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

80

Phase

  • Phase 4

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Beschreibung

Co-hort 1: Strict co-hort Inclusion criteria1:Histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer; Inclusion criteria2:Age ≥ 18 years at the time of signing the informed consent form; Inclusion criteria3:ALK-positive status confirmed by tissue samples or blood tests at each centre; Inclusion criteria4:History of resistance to lorlatinib treatment; prior use of ensartinib is not permitted; patients must have received a maximum of two other ALK-TKIs; prior receipt of ≤2 courses of chemotherapy is permitted; ECOG Performance Status (PS) score between 0 and 2, with no deterioration within 2 weeks prior to study entry;

Co-hort 2 (Compassionate Use Cohort):

Inclusion criteria1: Resistance to lorlatinib treatment; Inclusion criteria2: No restrictions on prior use of ensartinib or the number of prior lines of other ALK-TKIs and chemotherapy; Inclusion criteria3:Subjects with concomitant leptomeningeal metastases may be enrolled. For patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM), diagnosis must be based on the three criteria outlined in the EANO-ESMO guidelines: clinical presentation, cranial imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid cytology. Tissue samples must not be derived from tumour sites that have previously undergone radiotherapy; however, new lesions arising after local treatment may be included; Inclusion criteria4:ECOG performance status of 0-4; Inclusion criteria5: Adequate organ system function, as determined by the investigator; Inclusion criteria6:All other inclusion criteria are consistent with items 1, 2 and 3 of Cohort 1.

Exclusion criteria1:Concurrent malignant tumours. Exclusion criteria2:Patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM) who are unable to undergo contrast-enhanced MRI.

Exclusion criteria3:Patients who have undergone surgery within 4 weeks prior to treatment with the study drug, except for minor procedures deemed by the investigator not to preclude participation in the trial; or patients scheduled to undergo major surgery during the study period.

Exclusion criteria4:Patients who have experienced a marked deterioration in symptoms or signs within 2 weeks prior to screening and are deemed by the investigator to be unsuitable for participation in the trial.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Nicht randomisiert
  • Interventionsmodell: Einzelgruppenzuweisung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Sonstiges: Strict Queue
Patients with a performance status (ECOG) score of 0-2 and brain parenchymal metastases were enrolled in Cohort 1.
Ensatinib is administered at a dose of 225 mg once daily, either on an empty stomach or with food; anlotinib is administered at a dose of 10 mg once daily, in 21-day cycles; treatment continues until disease progression, the occurrence of intolerable toxicity, withdrawal at the discretion of the investigator or the subject, loss to follow-up, initiation of other anticancer therapy, or death.
Sonstiges: Compassionate Use Cohort
Patients with a performance status (ECOG) score of 0-4 and leptomeningeal metastases were enrolled in Cohort 2 (compassionate use cohort).
Ensatinib is administered at a dose of 225 mg once daily, either on an empty stomach or with food; anlotinib is administered at a dose of 10 mg once daily, in 21-day cycles; treatment continues until disease progression, the occurrence of intolerable toxicity, withdrawal at the discretion of the investigator or the subject, loss to follow-up, initiation of other anticancer therapy, or death.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Objective response rate (ORR)
Zeitfenster: After the patients were enrolled according to the inclusion criteria, the tumor assessment will be conducted every 6 weeks, and the maximum duration of the assessment is 6 months until the patients have disease progression or cannot tolerate the treatmen
If the patient has available imaging results from within 28 days prior to the first dose (bone scans may be accepted if performed within 2 months prior to the first dose), repeat imaging is not required. Tumour assessment should be performed every 6 weeks (±4 days) until tumour progression.
After the patients were enrolled according to the inclusion criteria, the tumor assessment will be conducted every 6 weeks, and the maximum duration of the assessment is 6 months until the patients have disease progression or cannot tolerate the treatmen

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS)
Zeitfenster: The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Progression-free survival (PFS): defined as the time from randomisation to the first occurrence of objective tumour progression or death, whichever comes first.
The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Overall survival (OS)
Zeitfenster: The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Overall survival (OS): defined as the time from randomisation to the patient's death from any cause.
The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Duration of Response (DOR)
Zeitfenster: The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Duration of Response (DOR): Defined as the time from the first assessment of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) until the first assessment of disease progression (PD) or death from any cause.
The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Zeitfenster: The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Disease Control Rate (DCR): Defined as the proportion of patients who achieve complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) following treatment and maintain this status for a certain period.
The assessment was conducted every 2 cycles (6 weeks and 24 days), and the maximum duration of the assessment was 6 months until the patient's condition progressed or could not tolerate the treatment. As of June 2028, the follow-up work has been complete
Safety assessment
Zeitfenster: At the end of the first cycle (24 days in each cycle), a safety follow-up (telephone follow-up) was conducted within 28 days after the last administration.
Safety assessment: A summary of patients' physical examinations, electrocardiograms, ECOG scores, vital signs, adverse events and abnormal laboratory test results. All adverse events should be graded for severity in accordance with NCI CTCAE version 4.03.
At the end of the first cycle (24 days in each cycle), a safety follow-up (telephone follow-up) was conducted within 28 days after the last administration.

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

1. Juli 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

31. Dezember 2028

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

31. Dezember 2028

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

2. Juni 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

23. Juni 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

26. Juni 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

26. Juni 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

23. Juni 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juni 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren