Effect of Certain Denture Disinfectants on Surface Topography, Microhardness and Dimensional Stability of CAD/CAM Milled Polymethyl Methacrylate and Polyether Ether Ketone Denture Base Materials

June 23, 2026 updated by: walaa zain, Menoufia University

Evaluation of Effect of Certain Denture Disinfectants on Surface Topography, Microhardness and Dimensional Stability of CAD/CAM Milled Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) and Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Denture Base Materials: An In Vitro Study

This study aims to evaluate and compare the influence of different denture cleansing methods using 1% sodium hypochlorite solution, 0.2% chlorhexidine solution and effervescent alkaline peroxide tablet solution -according to manufacturer's instructions- on surface roughness , microhardness and dimensional stability (%) of CAD-CAM Milled both Polymethyl methacrylate and Polyether Ether Ketone denture base materials.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Dentures are custom-made medical devices prescribed by dentists and clinical dental technicians to replace oral hard and soft tissue structures. Dentures consist of the denture base and denture teeth. Denture bases can be fabricated using acrylic (polymethylmethacrylate [PMMA]), metal alloys (cobalt-chromium) and polymers, such as nylon-based thermoplastic resins, polyether ether ketone [PEEK] and aryl ketone polymer. Heat-cured PMMA is the most commonly used denture base; this is inherently porous, non shedding and readily aggregates denture plaque. Denture teeth can be fabricated from acrylic, composite resin, or porcelain as these are significantly smoother surfaces; however, denture plaque can grow around the 'tooth-gingivae' interface, which represents the interface between the denture teeth and pink resin of the denture, representing the gingival tissue.

Denture plaque contains pathogenic microbes including, Candida albicans (linked with denture stomatitis) and Streptococcus mutans (linked with caries development). Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus has been previously isolated from denture patients in general practice and the general hospital setting; however, it is unknown whether cross contamination or infection can occur when handling dentures. Most patients exhibit poor denture hygiene due to inadequate knowledge of optimal/correct cleaning techniques1 and a lack of standardization in denture hygiene assessments; dentists infrequently assess and record patients' denture hygiene status. Poor denture hygiene leads to increased risk of dental caries, periodontal disease, denture stomatitis and halitosis. Improper denture care negatively impacts denture clinical longevity and increases denture plaque aggregation. For example, scratches due to improper brushing technique, such as brushing with too hard a brush, can increase microbial growth, while inappropriate denture cleaner use can permanently damage a denture beyond clinical use. A working knowledge of denture base/tooth materials and denture cleaning methods should ensure optimal denture cleanliness without compromising material integrity and clinical longevity. Therefore, clinician-assisted patient education can improve patients' denture hygiene. The dental team is best suited to help provide patients with the necessary oral and denture hygiene education. The incorporation of CAD/CAM technology into complete denture design and fabrication streamlines the clinical and laboratory processes and provides improved physical properties that enhance denture quality. Studies have shown that CAD-CAM milled resins typically outperform 3D-printed materials in thermal stress resistance. Also, surface properties such as roughness, microhardness, and color stability are crucial determinants of durability and patient satisfaction. For instance, rougher surfaces can promote microbial adhesion, leading to biofilm formation and staining, while smoother, harder surfaces resist wear and microbial colonization. CAD-CAM milled PMMA showed significantly less C adherence. 3 and superior dimensional accuracy and stability compared with 3D printing and conventional methods. It remains the superior choice for long-term denture durability due to its high mechanical strength and wear resistance.

This study aims to evaluate and compare the influence of different denture cleansing methods using 1% sodium hypochlorite solution, 0.2% chlorhexidine solution and effervescent alkaline peroxide tablet solution -according to manufacturer's instructions- on surface roughness , microhardness and dimensional stability (%) of CAD-CAM Milled both Polymethyl methacrylate and Polyether Ether Ketone denture base materials.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

88

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Shibīn al Kawm, Egypt
        • Menoufia University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Used prefabricated CAD-CAM blocks (PMMA and PEEK, dental grade)
  • All specimens milled using standardized CAD-CAM protocols
  • Materials from same brand, batch and shade per group
  • All specimens polished to a clinical high gloss standard
  • Used standardized specimen geometry

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Specimens fabricated using a method other than CAD-CAM milling
  • Use blocks from different manufacturer, batches or shades within the same test group
  • Use specimens with fabrication defects (visible porosity, cracks, internal voids) or obvious milling errors (tool chattering marks, incomplete milling)
  • Specimens with dimensional inaccuracy
  • Specimens subjected to incorrect immersion time, temp or concentration of disinfectant
  • Use contaminated, not freshly prepared or expired disinfectant solutions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: M0 group
Material used is PMMA Distilled water - control group Disinfection method :Immersed in distilled water at 37 c for 6 months
Immersed in distilled water at 37 c for 6 months
Experimental: M1 group
Material used (PMMA) Type of cleanser: Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) Disinfection method :immersed in 1% sodium hypochlorite solution for 6 months
Immersed in 1% sodium hypochlorite solution for 6 months
Experimental: M2 Group
Material: PMMA Type of cleanser :Chlorhexidine (CHX) Disinfection method :Immersed in 0.2% chlorhexidine solution for 6 months
Immersed in 0.2% chlorhexidine solution for 6 months
Experimental: M3 group
Material used : PMMA Type of cleanser: Effervescent Alkaline Peroxide Tablet Disinfection method :Immersed in Effervescent tablet denture cleanser solution for 6 months
Immersed in Effervescent tablet denture cleanser solution for 6 months
Placebo Comparator: E0 group: (PEEK Control group)
Material: PEEK Distilled water : control group Disinfection method: Immersed in distilled water at 37 c for 6 months
Immersed in distilled water at 37 c for 6 months
Experimental: E1 group
Material : PEEK Type of cleanser :Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) Disinfection method :Immersed in 1% sodium hypochlorite solution for 6 months
Immersed in 1% sodium hypochlorite solution for 6 months
Experimental: E2 group
Material : PEEK Type of cleanser :Chlorhexidine (CHX) Disinfection method :Immersed in 0.2% chlorhexidine solution for 6 months
Immersed in 0.2% chlorhexidine solution for 6 months
Experimental: E3 group
Material : PEEK Type of cleanser : Effervescent Alkaline Peroxide Tablet Disinfection method : Immersed in Effervescent tablet denture cleanser solution for 6 months
Immersed in Effervescent tablet denture cleanser solution for 6 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surface Roughness Measurement
Time Frame: 6 months
Surface roughness (Ra) was measured using a profilometer. Each specimen was scanned at three random locations, and the mean value was recorded. The device was calibrated using the manufacturer's reference standard prior to each measurement session.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Microhardness Evaluation
Time Frame: 6 months
Surface hardness was determined by loading each specimen for 15 s with a force of 50 g, after mounting it on the microhardness tester. A rhomboid-shaped indentation was obtained on each specimen and its image was transferred to the computer monitor with the help of a microscope present along with the microhardness tester. The longest diagonal of the diamond indentation was marked and Vickers hardness number was calculated with the help of the software
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 31, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

It will be available if it needed

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stability

Clinical Trials on M0 group

3
Subscribe