Decompression With ELDOA on Lumbar Disc Protrusion Patient

September 2, 2021 updated by: Mir Arif Hussain, Aqua Medical Services (Pvt) Ltd

Compare the Effects of Decompression With ELDOA on Lumbar Disc Protrusion Patient

Decompression therapy is a result-oriented approach but it expensive and minimum availability in Pakistan. In physical therapy, we use different exercises to solve multiple spine problems. Some exercises used to treat orthogenic components such as mobilization, manipulation, SNAGS, and traction. Some exercises used to treat myogenic components such as muscle energy technique, neuromuscular reeducation, active isolated stretch, etc. Some exercises used to treat neurogenic components such as Neurodynamics, Active release technique, etc. As we know the fascia is an important component in our body most of the time the fascia restriction makes the patient condition verse. A researcher introduced the systems of exercise more the 35 years ago which works especially on the spine at every intervertebral level including costal and pelvic articulation. These exercises are called Elongation Longitudinaux Avec Decoaption Osteo-Articulaire (ELDOA) or simply Longitudinal Osteo-Articular De-coaptation Stretching (LOADS). It can be described as a fascial stretch that's localized tension at the level of a specific spinal segment and create decompression. In which he combined improving the tone of the intrinsic muscles of the spine along with reinforcing the extrinsic muscles related to the spine aim the back and stretching the interlinking paraspinal muscles. ELDOA exercise is designed for every level of the spine from the base of the skull to the sacroiliac joint. In each ELDOA exercise, we create fascial tension above and below the joint or disc that one is trying to "open up" or decompress. The outcomes include; Release vertebral compression, improved blood circulation, Disc re-hydration, improve muscle tone, and awareness. One of my studies also proved that ELDOA Exercises improve the pain and functional level in spinal disc protrusion patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Low back pain is the common problem of our society, 80% of people experience back pain at some stage of their life. Low Back pain lifetime prevalence is 65% to 80% and It is estimated that 28% experience disabling low back pain sometime during their lives. Point prevalence ranged from 12% to 33%, the 1-year prevalence ranged from 22% to 65%, and lifetime prevalence ranged from 11% to 84%. Back pain peak prevalence age is 40-50, First episode of start in the '20s and recurrence rates between 39-71%. Women tend to be affected more in cervical spine problems than men and men tend to more affected in lumbar spine problems than women. The majority (80-90%) of low back disorders occur at the L4/5 and/or L5/S1. The occupational risk factor include driving (P<0.001), lifting, carrying, pulling, pushing, and twisting (P<0.001 for all variables) as well as nondriving vibrational exposure (P<0.001).

Maitland divides lumbar spine problems into two groups, in the first group the L4/5 and L5/S1 intervertebral discs are frequently a source of symptoms and the second group has postural, muscle balance, muscle weakness, muscles spasm degenerative changes, and mechanical movement disorders problems. The L5-S1 Segment is the most common site of problem in the spine because this level bears more weight, Center of gravity passes directly through this vertebra, transition L5 Mobile and S1 Stable, Large angle B/w L5 & S1 and a great amount of movement.

The intervertebral disk makes up 1/3 of the total length of the vertebral column. The disc contains 85% to 90% of water, but the amount decreases up to 65% with age. The water-binding capacity of the disc decrease with age and degenerative changes begin to occur after 2nd decade of life. The Facet joint carries 20-25% axial body load but this may reach 70% with degeneration of the Disc. The most significant biochemical change to occur in disc degeneration is the loss of proteoglycan. This loss is responsible for a fall in the osmotic pressure of the disc matrix and therefore a loss of hydration. Loading may thus lead to inappropriate stress concentrations along the endplate or in the annulus.

CT Classification of Annular Tears There are five possible severities of the radial annular tear as seen on an axial CT image.

  • The grade 0 is a normal disc, where no contrast material injected in the center of the disc has leaked from the confines of the nucleus pulposus.
  • The grade 1 tear has leaked contrast material but only into the inner one-third of the annulus.
  • In the grade 2 tear, the contrast has leaked from the nucleus into the outer two-thirds of the annulus.
  • The grade 3 tear has leaked contrast completely through all three zones of the annulus.
  • The grade 4 tear the contrast has spread circumferentially around the disc, often resembling a ship's anchor. Pathologically, this represents the merging of a full-thickness radial tear with a concentric annular tear.
  • The grade 5 tear completely ruptured the outer layers of the disc and is leaking contrast material from the disc into the epidural space. This type of tear is thought to have the ability to induce a severe inflammatory reaction in the adjacent neural structures. In some patients, this inflammatory process is so severe that it causes painful chemical radiculopathy and sciatica without the presence of nerve root compression.

Low-back pain with leg pain may be caused by a herniated intervertebral disc exerting pressure on the nerve root. Most patients will respond to conservative treatment, but in carefully selected patients, a surgical discectomy may provide faster relief of symptoms. The Patient's history and physical examination along with MRI confirm the disc herniation diagnosis. In the case of spinal disc herniation, the management is Surgical and conservative. In surgery, we have percutaneous procedures such as chymopapain injections, Annuloplasty, Percutaneous disc decompression, and Endoscopic percutaneous discectomy and Open Surgery such as Laminectomy, Discectomy/Microdiscectomy, Artificial disc surgery, and Spinal fusion. The Conservative Management includes Oral Analgesic, Gentle traction, Spinal Decompression, Spinal Stabilization, Exercise, and Fascia Stretching (ELDOA).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

180

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Federal
      • Islamabad, Federal, Pakistan, 44000
        • Aqua research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

28 years to 58 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • MRI of the lumbar spine showing lumbar disc bulge
  • Localized and radiating pain more than 5 on NPRS

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lumbar spondylolisthesis
  • Spinal stenosis
  • Fracture of the lumbar spine
  • Spinal tumor
  • Ankylosing spondylitis
  • Patients taking blood thinner medication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control Group

Pre-physiotherapy session:

  1. Tens
  2. Infrared/Moist Heat heat for 10 minutes at the low back region.
  3. Lumbar Mobilization (Maitland) CPA 3 sets of 10 reps
  4. Stretching Exercises (Calf, Hams, Back Extensors) 3 sets of 8-10 reps
  5. Strengthening Exercises (Back Extensors) 3 sets of 8-10 reps
  6. Postural Education
  7. Home Plan with lumbar Sacral Support

Bed rest after the controlled treatment is recommended for this group.

Treatment for this group is conventional physical therapy along with the bed rest.
Other Names:
  • Group A
Active Comparator: Decompression

Pre-physiotherapy session:

  1. Tens
  2. Infrared/Moist Heat heat for 10 minutes at the low back region.
  3. Lumbar Mobilization (Maitland) CPA 3 sets of 10 reps
  4. Stretching Exercises (Calf, Hams, Back Extensors) 3 sets of 8-10 reps
  5. Strengthening Exercises (Back Extensors) 3 sets of 8-10 reps
  6. Postural Education
  7. Home Plan

Decompression therapy session after the controlled treatment is recommended for this group.

Treatment for this is conventional physical therapy along with the spinal decompression.
Other Names:
  • Group B
Active Comparator: ELDOA

Pre-physiotherapy session:

  1. Tens
  2. Infrared/Moist Heat heat for 10 minutes at low back region.
  3. Lumbar Mobilization (Maitland) CPA 3 sets of 10 reps
  4. Stretching Exercises (Calf, Hams, Back Extensors) 3 sets of 8-10 reps
  5. Strengthening Exercises (Back Extensors) 3 sets of 8-10 reps
  6. Postural Education
  7. Home Plan

Segmental Spinal ELDOA Exercise after the controlled treatment is recommended for this group.

Treatment for this is conventional physical therapy along with the ELDOA.
Other Names:
  • Group C

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Time Frame: Up to 3 weeks
The scale of pain. The patient will be asked to report pain on a 1-10 numbering scale. 1 means minimum pain and 10 means extreme pain.
Up to 3 weeks
Oswestry disability index
Time Frame: Up to 3 weeks
The scale of disability. The patient will be asked the referenced questions and the assessor will tick the answers. The maximum score of the Oswestry disability index is 100 percent which means complete disability whereas the minimum score is 0 percent which means no disability at all.
Up to 3 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Abdul Ghafoor Sajjad, MSPT, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University Islamabad

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Disc Herniation

Clinical Trials on Control Group

3
Subscribe