Randomized Cross-Over Comparison of Medium Cut-Off and High-Flux Hemodialysis Membranes (MCO-HD)

June 30, 2026 updated by: Veysel Baran TOMAR, Gazi University

Randomized Cross-Over Evaluation of Medium Cut-Off and High-Flux Hemodialysis Membranes on Inflammation and Cardiovascular Function in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients

Patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease, chronic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and impaired quality of life. Medium cut-Off (MCO) hemodialysis membranes have been developed to enhance the removal of middle-molecular-weight uremic toxins compared with conventional high-flux membranes, which may improve inflammatory status and cardiovascular health.

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of MCO and high-flux hemodialysis membranes on inflammatory biomarkers and cardiovascular function in adult patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. The primary outcomes are changes in serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) levels. Secondary outcomes include arterial stiffness assessed by pulse wave velocity (PWV), body composition assessed by Body Composition Monitor (BCM), handgrip strength, and patient-reported outcomes including quality of life, pruritus, and pain scores.

This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period crossover study conducted at Gazi University Faculty of Medicine. Thirty adult hemodialysis patients will be randomized to one of two treatment sequences. Participants in Sequence A will receive MCO dialysis membranes for the first 3 months followed by high-flux membranes for the next 3 months. Participants in Sequence B will receive high-flux membranes for the first 3 months followed by MCO membranes for the next 3 months. Blood samples and clinical assessments will be performed at baseline, month 3, and month 6.

The study is expected to provide evidence regarding the effects of different dialysis membrane technologies on inflammation and cardiovascular health and may contribute to optimizing membrane selection in routine hemodialysis practice.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Chronic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, vascular stiffness, and the accumulation of middle-molecular-weight uremic toxins are considered important contributors to adverse cardiovascular outcomes in this population. Conventional high-flux hemodialysis membranes provide effective small-solute clearance but have limited capacity for removing larger middle molecules involved in inflammation and vascular injury.

Medium cut-off (MCO) membranes have been developed to enhance the clearance of larger middle molecules while maintaining albumin retention within acceptable limits. Previous studies have suggested that MCO membranes may improve inflammatory profiles and patient-centered outcomes; however, data regarding their effects on endothelial dysfunction, arterial stiffness, body composition, and patient-reported outcomes remain limited.

This study is designed as a prospective, randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period crossover clinical investigation comparing MCO and high-flux hemodialysis membranes in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two treatment sequences. Sequence A will receive MCO membranes during Period 1 (Months 0-3) followed by high-flux membranes during Period 2 (Months 3-6). Sequence B will receive high-flux membranes during Period 1 followed by MCO membranes during Period 2. This crossover design allows each participant to serve as his or her own control, thereby reducing inter-individual variability.

Study assessments will be performed at baseline, Month 3, and Month 6. In addition to routine laboratory testing performed during standard hemodialysis follow-up, blood samples will be obtained at baseline, Month 3, and Month 6 for the measurement of serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1). Cardiovascular assessment will include pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurement. Nutritional and body composition status will be evaluated using Body Composition Monitor (BCM) parameters, including overhydration, ECW/TBW ratio, intracellular water, lean tissue index, body cell mass, and phase angle. Functional status will be assessed by handgrip strength measurement. Patient-reported outcomes will be evaluated using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36 (KDQOL-36), UP-Dial pruritus questionnaire, and Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ).

The primary objective is to compare the effects of MCO and high-flux membranes on IL-6 and VCAM-1 levels. Secondary objectives include evaluation of arterial stiffness, body composition, physical function, and patient-reported outcomes. The findings may provide clinically relevant evidence regarding membrane selection strategies in routine hemodialysis practice.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Ankara
      • Ankara, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye), 06500
        • Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nephrology, Hemodialysis Unit
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 to 80 years.
  • Receiving maintenance hemodialysis for at least 6 months.
  • Clinically stable and receiving thrice-weekly hemodialysis.
  • Able to comply with study procedures, questionnaires, and scheduled assessments.
  • Able and willing to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute infection at screening or enrollment.
  • Major surgery within the previous 3 months.
  • Active malignancy requiring ongoing treatment.
  • Terminal illness with limited life expectancy.
  • Physical or cognitive impairment preventing completion of study procedures or questionnaires.
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide written informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sequence A (MCO to High-Flux)
Participants randomized to Sequence A will receive medium cut-off (MCO) hemodialysis membranes during Period 1 (Months 0-3), followed by high-flux hemodialysis membranes during Period 2 (Months 3-6). Hemodialysis will be performed three times weekly according to standard clinical practice. Clinical, laboratory, and patient-reported outcome assessments will be performed at baseline, Month 3, and Month 6.
Medium cut-off (MCO) hemodialysis membrane used as part of routine maintenance hemodialysis treatment. MCO membranes are designed to enhance the clearance of larger middle-molecular-weight uremic toxins while maintaining clinically acceptable albumin retention. Participants assigned to MCO treatment periods will receive thrice-weekly hemodialysis according to standard clinical practice. In this study, MCO treatment will be delivered using the ELISIO™ MCO series (Nipro).
High-flux hemodialysis membrane used as part of routine maintenance hemodialysis treatment. High-flux membranes represent the current standard dialysis technology and provide effective clearance of small solutes and selected middle molecules. Participants assigned to high-flux treatment periods will receive thrice-weekly hemodialysis according to standard clinical practice. In this study, high-flux treatment will be delivered using the ELISIO™ HF series (Nipro).
Experimental: Sequence B (High-Flux to MCO)
Participants randomized to Sequence B will receive high-flux hemodialysis membranes during Period 1 (Months 0-3), followed by medium cut-off (MCO) hemodialysis membranes during Period 2 (Months 3-6). Hemodialysis will be performed three times weekly according to standard clinical practice. Clinical, laboratory, and patient-reported outcome assessments will be performed at baseline, Month 3, and Month 6.
Medium cut-off (MCO) hemodialysis membrane used as part of routine maintenance hemodialysis treatment. MCO membranes are designed to enhance the clearance of larger middle-molecular-weight uremic toxins while maintaining clinically acceptable albumin retention. Participants assigned to MCO treatment periods will receive thrice-weekly hemodialysis according to standard clinical practice. In this study, MCO treatment will be delivered using the ELISIO™ MCO series (Nipro).
High-flux hemodialysis membrane used as part of routine maintenance hemodialysis treatment. High-flux membranes represent the current standard dialysis technology and provide effective clearance of small solutes and selected middle molecules. Participants assigned to high-flux treatment periods will receive thrice-weekly hemodialysis according to standard clinical practice. In this study, high-flux treatment will be delivered using the ELISIO™ HF series (Nipro).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Serum Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Time Frame: At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)
Comparison of serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentrations during treatment with medium cut-off and high-flux hemodialysis membranes.
At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)
Change in Serum Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 (VCAM-1)
Time Frame: At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)
Comparison of serum vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) concentrations during treatment with medium cut-off and high-flux hemodialysis membranes.
At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV)
Time Frame: At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)
Assessment of arterial stiffness by pulse wave velocity measurements.
At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)
Change in Handgrip Strength
Time Frame: At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)
Assessment of physical function using handgrip strength measurement.
At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)
Change in Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36 (KDQOL-36) Score
Time Frame: At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)
Evaluation of patient-reported quality of life using the KDQOL-36 questionnaire.
At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)
Change in UP-Dial Pruritus Score
Time Frame: At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)
Evaluation of pruritus severity using the Uraemic Pruritus in Dialysis Patients (UP-Dial) scale. The UP-Dial total score ranges from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe pruritus and a worse outcome.
At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)
Change in Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Score
Time Frame: At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)
Evaluation of pain using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) total Pain Rating Index score. The SF-MPQ total Pain Rating Index score is calculated from 15 pain descriptors, each scored from 0 to 3, resulting in a total score range of 0 to 45. Higher scores indicate greater pain severity and a worse outcome.
At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)
Change in Overhydration (OH)
Time Frame: At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)
Assessment of overhydration (OH, L) measured using the Body Composition Monitor (BCM).
At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)
Change in Extracellular Water to Total Body Water Ratio (ECW/TBW)
Time Frame: At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)
Assessment of the extracellular water to total body water ratio (ECW/TBW) using the Body Composition Monitor (BCM).
At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)
Change in Intracellular Water (ICW)
Time Frame: At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)
Assessment of intracellular water (ICW, L) using the Body Composition Monitor (BCM).
At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)
Change in Lean Tissue Index (LTI)
Time Frame: At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)
Assessment of lean tissue index (LTI, kg/m²) using the Body Composition Monitor (BCM).
At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)
Change in Body Cell Mass (BCM)
Time Frame: At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)
Assessment of body cell mass (BCM, kg) using the Body Composition Monitor.
At baseline (July 2026), Month 3 (October 2026), and Month 6 (January 2027)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) are not planned to be shared publicly. The study involves a limited number of participants from a single center, and data will be retained and managed in accordance with institutional policies, ethical requirements, and applicable data protection regulations.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inflammation

Clinical Trials on Medium Cut-Off Hemodialysis Membrane

3
Subscribe