- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07681583
Derivation and Validation of the Fungal Pneumonia Assessment and Likelihood Predictor Score (FUNGAL-P)
The FUNGAL-P study is a single-center observational study designed to derive and validate a clinical prediction score for the early identification of fungal pneumonia in adult patients presenting with pneumonia.
The study includes a retrospective derivation cohort and a prospective validation cohort of patients undergoing microbiological evaluation of lower respiratory tract samples. Clinical, laboratory, radiological, microbiological, and treatment-related variables associated with fungal pneumonia will be analyzed to identify independent predictors of fungal infection. These predictors will be combined to develop the FUNGAL-P score.
The derived score will subsequently be evaluated in a prospective validation cohort to assess its diagnostic performance, calibration, and clinical utility. The ultimate goal is to facilitate earlier recognition of fungal pneumonia and support timely diagnostic testing and antifungal treatment in patients presenting to the Emergency Department or hospital with pneumonia.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Fungal pneumonia is an increasingly recognized cause of severe respiratory infection and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis remains challenging because clinical manifestations are often nonspecific and conventional diagnostic criteria may not be readily applicable in emergency care settings. Delayed recognition may result in delayed diagnostic investigations and initiation of targeted antifungal therapy.
The FUNGAL-P study is a no-profit, single-center observational study conducted at Careggi University Hospital (Florence, Italy). The study was designed to derive and validate a clinical prediction rule for the early identification of fungal pneumonia or fungal-bacterial coinfection among adult patients presenting with pneumonia.
The study consists of two sequential phases.
Retrospective derivation phase
The derivation cohort includes adult patients with microbiologically confirmed pneumonia diagnosed between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2023. Eligible patients underwent bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), bronchial aspirate, or endotracheal aspirate collection within 48 hours of hospital presentation. Microbiological investigations included fungal and bacterial cultures, galactomannan testing, molecular assays for Aspergillus species and Pneumocystis jirovecii, and multiplex molecular respiratory pathogen testing.
Patients with microbiologically confirmed fungal pneumonia constituted the study group, whereas patients with bacterial or viral pneumonia served as controls. Cases of fungal-bacterial coinfection were classified as fungal pneumonia. Patients without microbiological identification of a pathogen were excluded.
Prospective validation phase
The validation cohort includes consecutive adult patients with pneumonia enrolled between January 1, 2024 and December 31, 2024. Patients underwent routine microbiological investigations according to standard clinical practice. The performance of the derived FUNGAL-P score was evaluated prospectively without influencing clinical decision-making.
Outcome definition
The primary study outcome is fungal pneumonia, including infections caused by Aspergillus species, Pneumocystis jirovecii, and other fungal pathogens, as well as fungal-bacterial coinfections. Diagnosis is based on an integrated assessment of clinical presentation, radiological findings, microbiological results, fungal biomarkers, and molecular testing results. Final case adjudication includes review of clinical follow-up data, imaging studies, microbiological findings, and treatment decisions.
Data collection
Demographic characteristics, medical history, comorbidities, fungal infection risk factors, vital signs, laboratory findings, radiological data, microbiological results, administered treatments, and clinical outcomes are collected for all participants.
Statistical analysis
Independent predictors of fungal pneumonia are identified using multivariable logistic regression. Candidate variables are selected based on prior evidence and univariable analyses. Predictors retained in the final model are incorporated into the FUNGAL-P score. Diagnostic performance is evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and area under the ROC curve (AUROC). Calibration is assessed using calibration plots and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Internal validation is performed using bootstrap resampling, and clinical utility is evaluated through decision curve analysis.
Primary Objective
To derive a clinical prediction score for fungal pneumonia or fungal-bacterial coinfection in adult patients presenting with pneumonia.
Secondary Objectives
To prospectively validate the FUNGAL-P score. To assess score calibration and discrimination. To determine sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.
To evaluate the clinical utility of the score for identifying patients at increased risk of fungal pneumonia.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Lorenzo Pelagatti, MD, PhDs
- Phone Number: +39 3385917317
- Email: pelagattil@aou-careggi.toscana.it
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Peiman Nazerian, MD
- Email: nazierianp@aou-careggi.toscana.it
Study Locations
-
-
-
Florence, Italy
- Recruiting
- Careggi University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Lorenzo Pelagatti, MD, PhDs
- Phone Number: +393385917317
- Email: pelagattil@aou-careggi.toscana.it
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥18 years and ≤90 years.
- Presentation to the Emergency Department or hospital with pneumonia.
- Pneumonia defined according to IDSA/ATS criteria as the presence of at least two clinical signs or symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection (temperature <36.0°C or >38.0°C, respiratory rate >20 breaths/min, oxygen saturation <90% on room air, arterial PaO₂ <60 mmHg, cough, sputum production, white blood cell count <4,000/μL or >10,000/μL, or bandemia >10%) together with radiographic evidence of a new pulmonary infiltrate or cavitary lesion.
- Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), bronchial aspirate (BAS), or endotracheal aspirate (ETA) performed within 48 hours of hospital presentation.
- Modified Rankin Scale score <5.
- Availability of microbiological investigations for identification of fungal, bacterial, or viral pathogens.
- Provision of informed consent, when required by applicable regulations and ethics committee approval.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal or withdrawal of informed consent.
- Age <18 years or >90 years.
- Pregnancy.
- Expected life expectancy <3 months.
- Hospital-acquired pneumonia with onset >48 hours after hospital admission.
- Modified Rankin Scale score ≥5.
- Absence of microbiological diagnostic evaluation.
- No identified bacterial, fungal, or viral pathogen after microbiological investigations.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Retrospective Derivation Cohort
Adult patients with microbiologically confirmed pneumonia enrolled at Careggi University Hospital between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2023.
Clinical, laboratory, radiological, microbiological, treatment, and outcome data were collected to identify independent predictors of fungal pneumonia and to derive the FUNGAL-P clinical prediction score.
|
Observational assessment of clinical, laboratory, radiological, and microbiological variables used to derive and validate the FUNGAL-P clinical prediction score for fungal pneumonia.
No study-specific intervention was performed and patient management was not influenced by the study.
|
|
Prospective Validation Cohort
Consecutive adult patients with pneumonia enrolled at Careggi University Hospital between 13 nov, 2025 and December 31, 2030.
The cohort was used to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance, calibration, and clinical utility of the derived FUNGAL-P score without influencing clinical management.
|
Observational assessment of clinical, laboratory, radiological, and microbiological variables used to derive and validate the FUNGAL-P clinical prediction score for fungal pneumonia.
No study-specific intervention was performed and patient management was not influenced by the study.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the FUNGAL-P score
Time Frame: At completion of study analysis (30 days)
|
Evaluation of the discriminative ability of the FUNGAL-P score for identifying fungal pneumonia.
|
At completion of study analysis (30 days)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the FUNGAL-P score
Time Frame: At completion of study analysis (30 days)
|
Evaluation of the discriminative ability of the FUNGAL-P score for identifying fungal pneumonia.
|
At completion of study analysis (30 days)
|
|
Sensitivity and specificity of the FUNGAL-P score
Time Frame: At completion of study analysis (30 days)
|
Assessment of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the FUNGAL-P score at predefined score thresholds.
|
At completion of study analysis (30 days)
|
|
Calibration of the FUNGAL-P score
Time Frame: At completion of study analysis (30 days)
|
Assessment of agreement between predicted and observed probabilities of fungal pneumonia using calibration plots and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.
|
At completion of study analysis (30 days)
|
|
Clinical utility of the FUNGAL-P score
Time Frame: At completion of study analysis (30 days)
|
Evaluation of the net clinical benefit of the FUNGAL-P score using Decision Curve Analysis.
|
At completion of study analysis (30 days)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lorenzo Pelagatti, MD, PhD, University of Florence
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- 1. Esandi M, Magnasco L, Farina EC, et al. Early diagnosis of candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill patients: prospective study. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29(9):1534-1540. doi:10.1007/s00134-003-1825-3 2. Wang K, Wang Y, Liu M, et al. Retrospective evaluation of risk factors for invasive Candida infections in a medical ICU. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(14):e38338. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000038338 3. Kullberg BJ, Arendrup MC. Invasive candidiasis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(15):1445-1456. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1315399 4. Playford EG, Eggimann P, Calandra T, et al. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill patients. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10(12):775-784. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70267-7 5. Leroy G, Lambiotte F, Thévenin D, et al. Risk factors of invasive fungal disease in critically ill adult patients: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2012;16(5):R242. doi:10.1186/cc11844 6. Aguilar C, Kumar D, Humar A, et al. Risk factors for invasive fungal infections in lung transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Transplant. 2021;35(4):e14232. doi:10.1111/ctr.14232 7. Li Y, Wang J, Zhang H, et al. A novel scoring system to predict invasive candidiasis in immunocompetent critically ill patients. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1097574. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1097574 8. Bougnoux ME, Kac G, Aegerter P, et al. Candidemia and Candida colonization in critically ill patients: incidence and risk factors. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(11):1955-1961. doi:10.1007/s00134-008-1197-4 9. Bassetti M, Righi E, Ansaldi F, et al. A multicenter study of candidemia in intensive care units in Italy. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32(10):1523-1529. doi:10.1007/s00134-006-0298-8 10. Blot SI, Taccone FS, Van den Abeele AM, et al. A clinical algorithm to diagnose invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(9):1294-1303. doi:10.1007/s00134-012-2600-5 11. Lu LY, Cheng Y, Wang H, et al. Risk factors and outcomes of influenza
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
- Emergency Department
- Risk Factors
- CAP
- Diagnostic Accuracy
- Coinfection
- Infectious disease
- Internal medicine
- Respiratory Infection
- Clinical Prediction Rule
- Pulmonary Aspergillosis
- Risk Prediction
- Aspergillus
- SCORE
- Pneumocystis jirovecii
- Bronchoalveolar Lavage
- Pneumocystis Pneumonia
- Community-Acquired Pneumonia
- Fungal Pneumonia
- Clinical Risk Score
- FUNGAL-P Score
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Invasive Fungal Infections
- Pathologic Processes
- Disease Attributes
- Infections
- Respiratory Tract Diseases
- Lung Diseases
- Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
- Lung Diseases, Fungal
- Pneumocystis Infections
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Community-Acquired Infections
- Aspergillosis
- Emergencies
- Pneumonia
- Communicable Diseases
- Respiratory Tract Infections
- Pneumonia, Pneumocystis
- Pulmonary Aspergillosis
- Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis
- Mycoses
- Coinfection
- Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Other Study ID Numbers
- CEAVC 29602
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pneumonia
-
King Edward Memorial HospitalCompletedNosocomial Pneumonia | Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia | Aspiration Pneumonia | Ventilator-Associated PneumoniaIndia
-
Melinta Therapeutics, Inc.WithdrawnHospital-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia | Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia | Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia | Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
-
Khyber Teaching HospitalNot yet recruitingCommunity Acquired Pneumonia | Childhood PneumoniaPakistan
-
Venatorx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Biomedical Advanced Research and Development AuthorityWithdrawnHospital-acquired Pneumonia | Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
-
Universidad de la SabanaClínica Universidad de La Sabana; Universidad de La Sabana, ColombiaCompletedPneumococcal Pneumonia | Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)Colombia
-
Hannover Medical SchoolCharite University, Berlin, Germany; University of LeipzigUnknownCOVID-19 | Bacterial Pneumonia | Viral Pneumonia | Pneumonia Due to Streptococcus Pneumoniae | Pneumonia Due to H. Influenzae | Pneumonia, Organism Unspecified | Pneumonia in Diseases Classified Elsewhere | Pneumonia Due to Other Specified Infectious OrganismsGermany
-
PfizerCompletedVentilator-associated Pneumonia (VAP) | Nosocomial Pneumonia (NP)Bulgaria, France, Italy, Korea, Republic of, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Russian Federation, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom, Vietnam, Philippines, China, Ukraine, Argentina, Brazil, Hungary, Romania, India, Japan, Taiwan, Latvia, Czechia, Slov... and more
-
Arpida AGTerminatedHospital-Acquired Pneumonia | Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia | Health-Care-Associated Pneumonia
-
Nantes University HospitalSociété Française d'Anesthésie et de RéanimationCompletedPneumonia | Sepsis | Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia | Hospital Acquired PneumoniaFrance
-
Hu YinanEnrolling by invitationSialic Acid | Superoxide Dismutase | Lipid PneumoniaChina
Clinical Trials on FUNGAL-P Score Assessment
-
University of Texas at AustinCompletedSleep DisturbanceUnited States
-
Konya City HospitalNot yet recruitingAnesthesia, General | Frailty | Hypotension on InductionTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Tuba MadenCompletedAging | Aging Problems | Aging Disorder
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompletedMuscle Weakness | Motor Activity | Muscle StrengthUnited States
-
Marmara University Pendik Training and Research...CompletedStroke, IschemicTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompleted
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceCompletedStem Cell Transplantation | Haplo-identicalFrance
-
University of LeicesterUniversity Hospitals, LeicesterCompleted
-
University Hospital, AngersRecruitingDeep Vein Thrombosis | Venous Thromboembolism | Pulmonary Embolism | Thromboprophylaxis | Lower Limb Trauma | Immobilisation SyndromeFrance
-
Odense University HospitalThe Ottawa Hospital; University of Southern Denmark; Copenhagen Academy for Medical...Not yet recruitingMedical Education | Hysteroscopy | Abnormal Uterine Bleeding | Assessment Methods in Medical Training | Diagnostic Hysteroscopy | Operative HysteroscopyDenmark, Canada