Non-Invasive Risk Stratification for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in HCV-Related Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease Following Sustained Virological Response: Validation of the aMAP Score (HCV-aMAP)

July 1, 2026 updated by: Tawesak Tanwandee, Siriraj Hospital

Prediction of Risk of Hepatic Decompensation and Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Advanced Fibrotic or Cirrhotic Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C After Sustained Virologic Response

This retrospective cohort study evaluated the performance of non-invasive risk scores for predicting de novo hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with hepatitis C virus-related compensated advanced chronic liver disease who achieved sustained virological response after sofosbuvir-based direct-acting antiviral therapy. Patients treated at Siriraj Hospital between 2013 and 2023 were included if they had compensated advanced chronic liver disease and documented SVR12. The study compared FIB-4, APRI, ALBI, and aMAP scores calculated at SVR12 for prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma during long-term follow-up. The primary aim was to identify a very-low-risk subgroup in whom hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance might potentially be de-escalated.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study conducted at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand. Consecutive adult patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection and compensated advanced chronic liver disease who initiated interferon-free sofosbuvir-based direct-acting antiviral therapy between 2013 and 2023 and achieved sustained virological response at 12 weeks after treatment completion were included. Compensated advanced chronic liver disease was defined according to Baveno VII criteria, including histologic F3/F4 fibrosis, vibration-controlled transient elastography greater than 10 kPa, or clinical evidence of portal hypertension.

Baseline demographic, clinical, laboratory, and transient elastography data were collected from electronic medical records. The FIB-4, APRI, ALBI, and aMAP scores were calculated using laboratory values at SVR12. Patients with known or suspected hepatocellular carcinoma before direct-acting antiviral therapy, failure to achieve SVR12, or incomplete medical records precluding outcome assessment were excluded.

The primary outcome was de novo hepatocellular carcinoma during follow-up. Predictive performance of the non-invasive scores was assessed using time-to-event analysis, Kaplan-Meier methods, Cox proportional hazards regression, and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves at 1, 3, 5, and 8 years.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

571

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bangkok
      • Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand, 10700
        • Siriraj Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection and compensated advanced chronic liver disease who initiated sofosbuvir-based direct-acting antiviral therapy at Siriraj Hospital between 2013 and 2023 and achieved sustained virological response at 12 weeks after treatment completion.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Chronic hepatitis C virus infection treated with direct-acting antiviral therapy
  • Documented sustained virological response at 12 weeks after treatment completion
  • Evidence of compensated advanced chronic liver disease before direct-acting antiviral therapy, defined by at least one of the following: histologic F3 or F4 fibrosis, vibration-controlled transient elastography >10 kPa, radiologic features compatible with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis, or clinical or endoscopic evidence of portal hypertension
  • Minimum follow-up of 12 months after sustained virological response

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Incomplete or missing medical records precluding outcome assessment
  • Known or suspected hepatocellular carcinoma before initiating direct-acting antiviral therapy
  • Failure to achieve sustained virological response at 12 weeks

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
HCV-related cACLD After SVR
Adults with hepatitis C virus-related compensated advanced chronic liver disease who achieved sustained virological response at 12 weeks after sofosbuvir-based direct-acting antiviral therapy and were followed for de novo hepatocellular carcinoma.
FIB-4, APRI, ALBI, and aMAP scores were calculated using laboratory values at SVR12 to evaluate their performance for predicting de novo hepatocellular carcinoma during follow-up.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Development of de novo hepatocellular carcinoma
Time Frame: From SVR12 until diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, last follow-up, or up to 8 years after SVR12.
Occurrence of newly diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma after achievement of sustained virological response (SVR12). Patients with known or suspected hepatocellular carcinoma before direct-acting antiviral therapy were excluded.
From SVR12 until diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, last follow-up, or up to 8 years after SVR12.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Predictive accuracy of the FIB-4 score for de novo hepatocellular carcinoma
Time Frame: At 1, 3, 5, and 8 years after SVR12
Time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the FIB-4 score for predicting de novo hepatocellular carcinoma.
At 1, 3, 5, and 8 years after SVR12
Predictive accuracy of the APRI score for de novo hepatocellular carcinoma
Time Frame: At 1, 3, 5, and 8 years after SVR12
Time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the APRI score for predicting de novo hepatocellular carcinoma.
At 1, 3, 5, and 8 years after SVR12
Predictive accuracy of the ALBI score for de novo hepatocellular carcinoma
Time Frame: At 1, 3, 5, and 8 years after SVR12
Time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the ALBI score for predicting de novo hepatocellular carcinoma.
At 1, 3, 5, and 8 years after SVR12
Predictive accuracy of the aMAP score for de novo hepatocellular carcinoma
Time Frame: At 1, 3, 5, and 8 years after SVR12
Time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the aMAP score for predicting de novo hepatocellular carcinoma.
At 1, 3, 5, and 8 years after SVR12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tawesak Tanwandee, MD, Siriraj Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in this study may be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, subject to approval by the investigators and applicable institutional and ethical regulations.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning after publication of the study results; no fixed end date.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for purposes consistent with the approved study protocol and applicable ethical regulations. Requests should be directed to the corresponding author.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Clinical Trials on Non-invasive Risk Score Assessment

3
Subscribe