Validation of TriAGE+ for Predicting Stroke Risk in ED Patients Presenting With Dizziness

External Validation of the TriAGE+ Score for Predicting Cerebrovascular Disease Risk in Patients Presenting With Dizziness in the Emergency Department

Ischemic cerebrovascular diseases originating from the brain's posterior circulation account for 20-25% of cases. Among patients diagnosed with cerebellar infarction, 10% present with isolated dizziness as their sole symptom. Notably, posterior circulation strokes and cerebellar infarcts are misdiagnosed 2 to 4 times more frequently than anterior circulation strokes. In 2017, Kuroda et al. developed the TriAGE+ score to assess stroke risk in patients presenting with dizziness. This study aims to externally validate the TriAGE+ score, focusing on its safety, applicability, and reliability in predicting cerebrovascular disease in the emergency department.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Dizziness is a frequent complaint in emergency departments (ED), accounting for approximately 4% of visits. Epidemiological studies suggest that 3-20% of these patients experience dizziness due to cerebrovascular causes. In Turkey, data collected from 2013 to 2017 indicate that 2.4% of ED visits involved dizziness, with 36.8% of those patients being hospitalized due to central neurological events.

Cerebrovascular events (CVEs) involving the brain's posterior circulation-supplied by the vertebrobasilar arterial system and including regions such as the cerebellum, medulla oblongata, pons, and midbrain-are a common but often missed cause of dizziness. Studies have shown that 8.4% of patients presenting with isolated dizziness were later diagnosed with a posterior circulation stroke, and isolated dizziness has been recognized as the most common symptom in transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) and posterior circulation strokes.

In cerebellar stroke patients, 10% present with isolated dizziness. However, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), which is commonly used to assess stroke severity, often underestimates posterior circulation strokes due to its focus on symptoms typically associated with anterior circulation infarcts. Posterior circulation strokes make up 20-25% of ischemic strokes, yet they are underdiagnosed 2 to 4 times more frequently than their anterior counterparts.

This diagnostic challenge underscores the need for an effective risk stratification tool to aid clinicians. Although several risk scores for cerebrovascular events exist, including the widely used ABCD2 score developed by Navi et al., they are often inadequate in assessing stroke risk in patients presenting with dizziness, as they emphasize unilateral weakness and speech impairment, both of which are less relevant to posterior circulation strokes.

In 2017, Kuroda et al. developed the TriAGE+ score to specifically predict stroke risk in patients presenting with dizziness. Their study, conducted in Japan across five emergency departments, included 498 patients. The score, which ranges from 0 to 17, was designed to categorize patients into four risk groups: low (<5), moderate (5-7), high (8-9), and very high (>9) risk for stroke. A threshold score of 10, determined through Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis, provided a balance between sensitivity (77.5%; 95% CI 72.8-81.8) and specificity (72.1%; 95% CI 64.1-79.2). While this study demonstrated that the TriAGE+ score effectively predicted stroke risk, it was limited by its retrospective design and single-region focus, necessitating external validation.

Subsequently, Ho-Kun Yu et al. conducted an external validation study in Hong Kong in 2023, which, though supportive of the score's efficacy, shared similar limitations, including its retrospective, single-center design. As the TriAGE+ score was developed and validated primarily in Asia, it is critical to assess its generalizability and applicability in other populations. Our study seeks to perform an external validation of the TriAGE+ score in Turkey, with the aim of evaluating its safety, applicability, and reliability in a different population.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

818

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
        • Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study will include adult (>18 years old) patients presenting to the emergency department with dizziness. These patients must provide informed consent, or consent must be obtained from their legal guardians if the patients are unable to do so. This population will serve as the basis for externally validating the TriAGE+ score, developed in Japan, in a Turkish emergency department setting.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with dizziness who presented to the emergency department
  • Patients who provide informed consent, or legal guardians providing consent for patients unable to do so.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients whose primary symptom is syncope or presyncope, or who present with dizziness due to hemodynamic compromise from gastrointestinal bleeding or other major events.
  • Patients under the influence of alcohol or substances.
  • Pregnant patients.
  • Patients previously included in the study.
  • Patients who refuse medical treatment or withdraw consent.
  • Patients with incomplete data necessary for the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients with dizziness
Adults aged 18 years or older presenting to the emergency department with dizziness will be enrolled and followed for 30 days to assess the occurrence of cerebrovascular events, including stroke. No treatment or diagnostic intervention will be assigned by the study protocol. Clinical evaluation and management will be performed according to routine emergency department practice.
The TRIAGE+ score will be recorded or calculated in adults presenting to the emergency department with dizziness. The score will be evaluated for its association with cerebrovascular events occurring within 30 days. No study-directed treatment, imaging strategy, medication, or management decision will be assigned by the study protocol.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stroke
Time Frame: 30 days (patient will be followed up 30 days based on their initial visit with dizziness. During the 30-day period, any subsequent visits to relevant specialities or the emergency department will be reviewed to assess for a stroke diagnosis.)
Stroke will be defined as a new diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage occurring within 30 days after the index emergency department visit for dizziness. The diagnosis will be based on clinical evaluation supported by neuroimaging findings, including cranial computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging, and/or documentation by a neurologist or treating physician in the medical record.
30 days (patient will be followed up 30 days based on their initial visit with dizziness. During the 30-day period, any subsequent visits to relevant specialities or the emergency department will be reviewed to assess for a stroke diagnosis.)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke, Ischemic

Clinical Trials on TRIAGE+ score assessment

Subscribe