Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection - AntipLatelet Therapy Intensity in Guided coNservative Management (SCAD-ALIGN) Trial (SCAD-ALIGN)

June 28, 2026 updated by: Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection - Antiplatelet Therapy Intensity in Guided Conservative Management (SCAD-ALIGN) Trial

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare cause of acute coronary syndrome in which blood flow to the heart muscle is reduced or interrupted. It predominantly affects women between 30 and 55 years of age and typically occurs in the absence of atherosclerosis. For many years, SCAD remained underdiagnosed and has only recently been more systematically recognised. The SCAD-ALIGN trial will be the first randomised study to systematically compare two antiplatelet treatment strategies in patients with SCAD.

SCAD is usually not associated with significant atherosclerosis or the classic vessel occlusion caused by a blood clot. Instead, bleeding occurs within the wall of a coronary artery, causing the vessel layers to separate and thereby impairing or completely obstructing blood flow. Patients develop symptoms of acute myocardial infarction, such as chest pain, shortness of breath, or nausea. A characteristic feature is that these symptoms often occur in individuals without a prior history or risk of heart disease.

Platelets play a crucial role in blood clotting but can also accumulate inside blood vessels and further impair flow. Antiplatelet medications are used to prevent this. In current clinical practice, SCAD patients are often treated according to general guidelines for acute coronary syndrome, which typically include two different antiplatelet therapies, a strategy developed and tested in older patients with proven atherosclerosis.

The SCAD-ALIGN trial is based on a fundamental difference between SCAD and classic heart attacks. In typical heart attacks, a blood clot usually blocks a vessel, and after the implantation of a vascular support device ("stent"), intensive antiplatelet therapy is used to prevent further clot formation. In SCAD, however, the underlying problem is a tear or bleeding within the vessel wall. In this situation, intensive antiplatelet therapy could delay the resolution of the bleeding or even worsen it, thereby adversely affecting the course of the disease. The study will therefore investigate whether a less intensive treatment strategy may be more beneficial in these patients.

The SCAD-ALIGN trial compares two treatment strategies: moderate antiplatelet therapy with a single medication for three months versus more intensive therapy with two agents for three months, followed by nine months of treatment with a single medication. The primary endpoint is a composite of recurrent myocardial ischemia, recurrent SCAD, myocardial infarction, the need for revascularization, and death.

The SCAD-ALIGN trial is part of the Multinational Clinical Trials Initiative of the Global Cardiovascular Research Funders Forum (GCRFF). The study is designed as an international, multicentre, randomised, open-label clinical trial. Because SCAD is a rare condition, close collaboration across national borders is essential. The results are expected to make an important contribution to the development of evidence-based treatment recommendations for SCAD, improve care and quality of life for patients worldwide.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD) is an important cause of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), predominantly in younger women. Evidence to guide optimal antiplatelet therapy is limited. Although dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is commonly prescribed, observational studies have linked DAPT to higher rates of adverse cardiovascular events in conservatively managed SCAD. The SCAD-ALIGN trial is an international, prospective, randomized, open-label, group-sequential adaptative, blinded endpoint-adjudicated with two-parallel groups, multicenter trial comparing an intensive APT strategy versus a moderate APT strategy in patients with ACS due to SCAD who are treated conservatively, i.e., without revascularization. The SCAD-ALIGN study will define the benefit-risk balance of these strategies, inform international guideline committees, and clarify optimal treatment strategies. To demonstrate the superiority of a moderate intensity APT strategy compared to an intensive treatment regimen in patients presenting with an ACS caused by SCAD with planned conservative management with regard to major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite endpoint consisting of all-cause mortali-ty, myocardial infarction, recurrent SCAD, unplanned coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, or transient ischemic attack 12 months after randomization was chosen.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

3518

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 1M9
        • Division of Cardiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia
        • Contact:
    • Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg
      • Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
        • Contact:
      • Nieuwegein, Netherlands, 3435 CM
        • Division of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Linköping, Sweden, SE-581 83
        • Department of Cardiology and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University
        • Contact:
      • Leicester, United Kingdom, LE1 5WW
        • University Hospitals Of Leicester Nhs Trust
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥18 years.
  2. Presentation with an Acute Coronary Syndrome.
  3. Suspected SCAD on coronary angiography (determined by the local investigator).
  4. Planned conservative treatment of SCAD.
  5. Intensive as well as moderate treatment of SCAD is possible.
  6. Ability to understand the patient information and to personally sign and date the informed consent to participate in the study, before completing any study-related procedures.
  7. The patient is cooperative and available for the entire study.
  8. Written and informed consent.
  9. For women of childbearing potential: Patient is willing to use adequate contraceptive precautions during the study (until 12 Month FU)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Hypersensitivity to the study medication.
  2. Any indication for oral anticoagulation.
  3. Any indication for APT (including thienopyridines, non-thienopyridines, ASA and other anti-thrombotic agents) other than SCAD.
  4. Cardiogenic shock at the time of screening.
  5. Coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring secondary preventive therapy with APT.
  6. Life threatening bleeding (BARC type ≥3) at the time of screening.
  7. Active bleeding, such as peptic ulcer, tumor bleeding or intracranial hemor-rhage at the time of screening.
  8. History of major bleeding, BARC class ≥3 within 3 months before study in-clusion.
  9. Known bleeding diathesis.
  10. Known coagulopathy or refusal of blood transfusion.
  11. Planned surgery or intervention at high bleeding risk during the study period.
  12. Co-administration of contraindicated medications as follows: other P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor); anticoagulants (warfarin, new oral antico-agulants, or chronic therapy with subcutaneous anticoagulants); cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitors (fluoxetine, moclobemid or voriconazole); probenecid; high dose of methotrexate (≥15 mg/week); lithium.
  13. Known pregnancy or lactation.
  14. Current participation in another clinical trial with drugs or medicinal products.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: moderate APT
moderate APT therapy, defined as 3 months ASA followed by cessation of APT
3 months ASA monotherapy, dose accoring to international guidelines and local Standard of Care
Active Comparator: intensive APT
intensive APT therapy, defined as 3 months DAPT (ASA + clopidogrel), followed by 9 months of clopidogrel monotherapy
3 months ASA + clopidgrel DAPT, followed by 9 months of clopidogrel monotherapy, doses accoring to international guidelines and local Standard of Care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events) with all-cause-mortality
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
MACE as a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, recurrent SCAD, unplanned coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, or transient is-chemic attack
12 months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
First secondary endpoint: MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events) with cardiovascular mortality
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
Composite endpoint consisting of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, recurrent SCAD, unplanned coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, or transient ischemic attack
12 months follow-up
second secondary endpdoint: NACE (Net adverse clinical events)
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up
composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, recurrent SCAD, unplanned coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and Bleeding aca-demia research consortium (BARC) bleeding types 3 or 5
12 months follow-up
MACE
Time Frame: 3 Months follow-up
composite endpoint consisting of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, recurrent SCAD, unplanned coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, or transient ischemic attack
3 Months follow-up
all-cause mortality
Time Frame: 3 months FU
3 months FU
all-cause mortality
Time Frame: 12 months FU
12 months FU
cardiovascular mortality
Time Frame: 3 months FU
3 months FU
cardiovascular mortality
Time Frame: 12 months FU
12 months FU
myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 3 months FU
3 months FU
myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 12 months FU
12 months FU
recurrent SCAD
Time Frame: 3 months FU
3 months FU
recurrent SCAD
Time Frame: 12 months FU
12 months FU
unplanned coronary revascularization
Time Frame: 3 months FU
3 months FU
unplanned coronary revascularization
Time Frame: 12 months FU
12 months FU
ischemic stroke
Time Frame: 3 months FU
3 months FU
ischemic stroke
Time Frame: 12 months FU
12 months FU
transient ischemic attack
Time Frame: 3 months FU
3 months FU
transient ischemic attack
Time Frame: 12 months FU
12 months FU
NACE
Time Frame: 3 months FU
composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, recurrent SCAD, unplanned coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and BARC bleeding types 3 or 5
3 months FU
BARC bleeding type 1, 2, 3 or 5
Time Frame: 3 months FU
3 months FU
BARC bleeding type 1, 2, 3 or 5
Time Frame: 12 months FU
12 months FU
Menorrhagia associated quality of life
Time Frame: 3 months FU
assessed with Menorrhagia multi-attribute scale (MMAS), consisting of 6 dimensions with 4-level Likert scale for responses
3 months FU
Menorrhagia associated quality of life
Time Frame: 12 months FU
assessed with Menorrhagia multi-attribute scale (MMAS), consisting of 6 dimensions with 4-level Likert scale for responses
12 months FU
MACE
Time Frame: 3 Months follow-up
composite endpoint consisting of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, recurrent SCAD, unplanned coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, or transient ischemic attack
3 Months follow-up
Health-related Quality of Life
Time Frame: 3 months FU
assessed with EQ5D-5L questionnaire, consisting of 5 domains with 5-level Likert scale and a visual analogue self-rating scale (VAS) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best)
3 months FU
Health-related Quality of Life
Time Frame: 12 months FU
assessed with EQ5D-5L questionnaire, consisting of 5 domains with 5-level Likert scale and a visual analogue self-rating scale (VAS) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best)
12 months FU
Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-8
Time Frame: 3 months FU
self-administered version of the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders diagnostic Instrument for common mental disorders. The PHQ-8 is the depression module, which scores each of the 8 diagnostic criteria for major depression in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Fourth Edition using a 4-level Likert scale
3 months FU
Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-8
Time Frame: 12 months FU
self-administered version of the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders diagnostic Instrument for common mental disorders. The PHQ-8 is the depression module, which scores each of the 8 diagnostic criteria for major depression in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Fourth Edition using a 4-level Likert scale
12 months FU
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 months FU
screening tool to identify probable cases of GAD and to assess symptom severity. 7 items and 4-level Likert-scale
3 months FU
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months FU
screening tool to identify probable cases of GAD and to assess symptom severity. 7 items and 4-level Likert-scale
12 months FU

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2033

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2033

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

to be determined as global study with various stakeholders and country-specific requirements.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on SCAD

Clinical Trials on Acetylsalicylic acid ASA

3
Subscribe