Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection - AntipLatelet Therapy Intensity in Guided coNservative Management (SCAD-ALIGN) Trial (SCAD-ALIGN)

28. Juni 2026 aktualisiert von: Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection - Antiplatelet Therapy Intensity in Guided Conservative Management (SCAD-ALIGN) Trial

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare cause of acute coronary syndrome in which blood flow to the heart muscle is reduced or interrupted. It predominantly affects women between 30 and 55 years of age and typically occurs in the absence of atherosclerosis. For many years, SCAD remained underdiagnosed and has only recently been more systematically recognised. The SCAD-ALIGN trial will be the first randomised study to systematically compare two antiplatelet treatment strategies in patients with SCAD.

SCAD is usually not associated with significant atherosclerosis or the classic vessel occlusion caused by a blood clot. Instead, bleeding occurs within the wall of a coronary artery, causing the vessel layers to separate and thereby impairing or completely obstructing blood flow. Patients develop symptoms of acute myocardial infarction, such as chest pain, shortness of breath, or nausea. A characteristic feature is that these symptoms often occur in individuals without a prior history or risk of heart disease.

Platelets play a crucial role in blood clotting but can also accumulate inside blood vessels and further impair flow. Antiplatelet medications are used to prevent this. In current clinical practice, SCAD patients are often treated according to general guidelines for acute coronary syndrome, which typically include two different antiplatelet therapies, a strategy developed and tested in older patients with proven atherosclerosis.

The SCAD-ALIGN trial is based on a fundamental difference between SCAD and classic heart attacks. In typical heart attacks, a blood clot usually blocks a vessel, and after the implantation of a vascular support device ("stent"), intensive antiplatelet therapy is used to prevent further clot formation. In SCAD, however, the underlying problem is a tear or bleeding within the vessel wall. In this situation, intensive antiplatelet therapy could delay the resolution of the bleeding or even worsen it, thereby adversely affecting the course of the disease. The study will therefore investigate whether a less intensive treatment strategy may be more beneficial in these patients.

The SCAD-ALIGN trial compares two treatment strategies: moderate antiplatelet therapy with a single medication for three months versus more intensive therapy with two agents for three months, followed by nine months of treatment with a single medication. The primary endpoint is a composite of recurrent myocardial ischemia, recurrent SCAD, myocardial infarction, the need for revascularization, and death.

The SCAD-ALIGN trial is part of the Multinational Clinical Trials Initiative of the Global Cardiovascular Research Funders Forum (GCRFF). The study is designed as an international, multicentre, randomised, open-label clinical trial. Because SCAD is a rare condition, close collaboration across national borders is essential. The results are expected to make an important contribution to the development of evidence-based treatment recommendations for SCAD, improve care and quality of life for patients worldwide.

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD) is an important cause of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), predominantly in younger women. Evidence to guide optimal antiplatelet therapy is limited. Although dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is commonly prescribed, observational studies have linked DAPT to higher rates of adverse cardiovascular events in conservatively managed SCAD. The SCAD-ALIGN trial is an international, prospective, randomized, open-label, group-sequential adaptative, blinded endpoint-adjudicated with two-parallel groups, multicenter trial comparing an intensive APT strategy versus a moderate APT strategy in patients with ACS due to SCAD who are treated conservatively, i.e., without revascularization. The SCAD-ALIGN study will define the benefit-risk balance of these strategies, inform international guideline committees, and clarify optimal treatment strategies. To demonstrate the superiority of a moderate intensity APT strategy compared to an intensive treatment regimen in patients presenting with an ACS caused by SCAD with planned conservative management with regard to major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite endpoint consisting of all-cause mortali-ty, myocardial infarction, recurrent SCAD, unplanned coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, or transient ischemic attack 12 months after randomization was chosen.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

3518

Phase

  • Phase 4

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studieren Sie die Kontaktsicherung

Studienorte

  • Deutschland
    • Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg
      • Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg, Deutschland, 20246
        • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
        • Kontakt:
  • Kanada
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Kanada, V5Z 1M9
        • Division of Cardiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia
        • Kontakt:
  • Niederlande
      • Nieuwegein, Niederlande, 3435 CM
        • Division of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital
        • Kontakt:
  • Schweden
      • Linköping, Schweden, SE-581 83
        • Department of Cardiology and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University
        • Kontakt:
  • Vereinigtes Königreich
      • Leicester, Vereinigtes Königreich, LE1 5WW
        • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
        • Kontakt:

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥18 years.
  2. Presentation with an Acute Coronary Syndrome.
  3. Suspected SCAD on coronary angiography (determined by the local investigator).
  4. Planned conservative treatment of SCAD.
  5. Intensive as well as moderate treatment of SCAD is possible.
  6. Ability to understand the patient information and to personally sign and date the informed consent to participate in the study, before completing any study-related procedures.
  7. The patient is cooperative and available for the entire study.
  8. Written and informed consent.
  9. For women of childbearing potential: Patient is willing to use adequate contraceptive precautions during the study (until 12 Month FU)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Hypersensitivity to the study medication.
  2. Any indication for oral anticoagulation.
  3. Any indication for APT (including thienopyridines, non-thienopyridines, ASA and other anti-thrombotic agents) other than SCAD.
  4. Cardiogenic shock at the time of screening.
  5. Coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring secondary preventive therapy with APT.
  6. Life threatening bleeding (BARC type ≥3) at the time of screening.
  7. Active bleeding, such as peptic ulcer, tumor bleeding or intracranial hemor-rhage at the time of screening.
  8. History of major bleeding, BARC class ≥3 within 3 months before study in-clusion.
  9. Known bleeding diathesis.
  10. Known coagulopathy or refusal of blood transfusion.
  11. Planned surgery or intervention at high bleeding risk during the study period.
  12. Co-administration of contraindicated medications as follows: other P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor); anticoagulants (warfarin, new oral antico-agulants, or chronic therapy with subcutaneous anticoagulants); cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitors (fluoxetine, moclobemid or voriconazole); probenecid; high dose of methotrexate (≥15 mg/week); lithium.
  13. Known pregnancy or lactation.
  14. Current participation in another clinical trial with drugs or medicinal products.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: moderate APT
moderate APT therapy, defined as 3 months ASA followed by cessation of APT
Arzneimittel: Acetylsalicylic acid ASA
3 months ASA monotherapy, dose accoring to international guidelines and local Standard of Care
Aktiver Komparator: intensive APT
intensive APT therapy, defined as 3 months DAPT (ASA + clopidogrel), followed by 9 months of clopidogrel monotherapy
Arzneimittel: ASA plus Clopidogrel
3 months ASA + clopidgrel DAPT, followed by 9 months of clopidogrel monotherapy, doses accoring to international guidelines and local Standard of Care

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events) with all-cause-mortality
Zeitfenster: 12 months follow-up
MACE as a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, recurrent SCAD, unplanned coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, or transient is-chemic attack
12 months follow-up

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
First secondary endpoint: MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events) with cardiovascular mortality
Zeitfenster: 12 months follow-up
Composite endpoint consisting of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, recurrent SCAD, unplanned coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, or transient ischemic attack
12 months follow-up
second secondary endpdoint: NACE (Net adverse clinical events)
Zeitfenster: 12 months follow-up
composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, recurrent SCAD, unplanned coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and Bleeding aca-demia research consortium (BARC) bleeding types 3 or 5
12 months follow-up
MACE
Zeitfenster: 3 Months follow-up
composite endpoint consisting of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, recurrent SCAD, unplanned coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, or transient ischemic attack
3 Months follow-up
all-cause mortality
Zeitfenster: 3 months FU
3 months FU
all-cause mortality
Zeitfenster: 12 months FU
12 months FU
cardiovascular mortality
Zeitfenster: 3 months FU
3 months FU
cardiovascular mortality
Zeitfenster: 12 months FU
12 months FU
myocardial infarction
Zeitfenster: 3 months FU
3 months FU
myocardial infarction
Zeitfenster: 12 months FU
12 months FU
recurrent SCAD
Zeitfenster: 3 months FU
3 months FU
recurrent SCAD
Zeitfenster: 12 months FU
12 months FU
unplanned coronary revascularization
Zeitfenster: 3 months FU
3 months FU
unplanned coronary revascularization
Zeitfenster: 12 months FU
12 months FU
ischemic stroke
Zeitfenster: 3 months FU
3 months FU
ischemic stroke
Zeitfenster: 12 months FU
12 months FU
transient ischemic attack
Zeitfenster: 3 months FU
3 months FU
transient ischemic attack
Zeitfenster: 12 months FU
12 months FU
NACE
Zeitfenster: 3 months FU
composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, recurrent SCAD, unplanned coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and BARC bleeding types 3 or 5
3 months FU
BARC bleeding type 1, 2, 3 or 5
Zeitfenster: 3 months FU
3 months FU
BARC bleeding type 1, 2, 3 or 5
Zeitfenster: 12 months FU
12 months FU
Menorrhagia associated quality of life
Zeitfenster: 3 months FU
assessed with Menorrhagia multi-attribute scale (MMAS), consisting of 6 dimensions with 4-level Likert scale for responses
3 months FU
Menorrhagia associated quality of life
Zeitfenster: 12 months FU
assessed with Menorrhagia multi-attribute scale (MMAS), consisting of 6 dimensions with 4-level Likert scale for responses
12 months FU
MACE
Zeitfenster: 3 Months follow-up
composite endpoint consisting of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, recurrent SCAD, unplanned coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, or transient ischemic attack
3 Months follow-up
Health-related Quality of Life
Zeitfenster: 3 months FU
assessed with EQ5D-5L questionnaire, consisting of 5 domains with 5-level Likert scale and a visual analogue self-rating scale (VAS) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best)
3 months FU
Health-related Quality of Life
Zeitfenster: 12 months FU
assessed with EQ5D-5L questionnaire, consisting of 5 domains with 5-level Likert scale and a visual analogue self-rating scale (VAS) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best)
12 months FU
Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-8
Zeitfenster: 3 months FU
self-administered version of the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders diagnostic Instrument for common mental disorders. The PHQ-8 is the depression module, which scores each of the 8 diagnostic criteria for major depression in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Fourth Edition using a 4-level Likert scale
3 months FU
Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-8
Zeitfenster: 12 months FU
self-administered version of the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders diagnostic Instrument for common mental disorders. The PHQ-8 is the depression module, which scores each of the 8 diagnostic criteria for major depression in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Fourth Edition using a 4-level Likert scale
12 months FU
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) questionnaire
Zeitfenster: 3 months FU
screening tool to identify probable cases of GAD and to assess symptom severity. 7 items and 4-level Likert-scale
3 months FU
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) questionnaire
Zeitfenster: 12 months FU
screening tool to identify probable cases of GAD and to assess symptom severity. 7 items and 4-level Likert-scale
12 months FU

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Mitarbeiter

Gesellschaft für Therapieforschung mbH
Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK)
National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK
Cardio-CARE AG, Davos

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

1. März 2027

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

28. Februar 2033

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

28. Februar 2033

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

2. Juni 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

28. Juni 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

6. Juli 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

6. Juli 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

28. Juni 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Mai 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • SCAD-ALIGN-DZHK31
  • 2025-523985-26-00 (Ctis)

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

UNENTSCHIEDEN

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

to be determined as global study with various stakeholders and country-specific requirements.

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren