Tämä sivu käännettiin automaattisesti, eikä käännösten tarkkuutta voida taata. Katso englanninkielinen versio lähdetekstiä varten.

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection - AntipLatelet Therapy Intensity in Guided coNservative Management (SCAD-ALIGN) Trial (SCAD-ALIGN)

sunnuntai 28. kesäkuuta 2026 päivittänyt: Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection - Antiplatelet Therapy Intensity in Guided Conservative Management (SCAD-ALIGN) Trial

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare cause of acute coronary syndrome in which blood flow to the heart muscle is reduced or interrupted. It predominantly affects women between 30 and 55 years of age and typically occurs in the absence of atherosclerosis. For many years, SCAD remained underdiagnosed and has only recently been more systematically recognised. The SCAD-ALIGN trial will be the first randomised study to systematically compare two antiplatelet treatment strategies in patients with SCAD.

SCAD is usually not associated with significant atherosclerosis or the classic vessel occlusion caused by a blood clot. Instead, bleeding occurs within the wall of a coronary artery, causing the vessel layers to separate and thereby impairing or completely obstructing blood flow. Patients develop symptoms of acute myocardial infarction, such as chest pain, shortness of breath, or nausea. A characteristic feature is that these symptoms often occur in individuals without a prior history or risk of heart disease.

Platelets play a crucial role in blood clotting but can also accumulate inside blood vessels and further impair flow. Antiplatelet medications are used to prevent this. In current clinical practice, SCAD patients are often treated according to general guidelines for acute coronary syndrome, which typically include two different antiplatelet therapies, a strategy developed and tested in older patients with proven atherosclerosis.

The SCAD-ALIGN trial is based on a fundamental difference between SCAD and classic heart attacks. In typical heart attacks, a blood clot usually blocks a vessel, and after the implantation of a vascular support device ("stent"), intensive antiplatelet therapy is used to prevent further clot formation. In SCAD, however, the underlying problem is a tear or bleeding within the vessel wall. In this situation, intensive antiplatelet therapy could delay the resolution of the bleeding or even worsen it, thereby adversely affecting the course of the disease. The study will therefore investigate whether a less intensive treatment strategy may be more beneficial in these patients.

The SCAD-ALIGN trial compares two treatment strategies: moderate antiplatelet therapy with a single medication for three months versus more intensive therapy with two agents for three months, followed by nine months of treatment with a single medication. The primary endpoint is a composite of recurrent myocardial ischemia, recurrent SCAD, myocardial infarction, the need for revascularization, and death.

The SCAD-ALIGN trial is part of the Multinational Clinical Trials Initiative of the Global Cardiovascular Research Funders Forum (GCRFF). The study is designed as an international, multicentre, randomised, open-label clinical trial. Because SCAD is a rare condition, close collaboration across national borders is essential. The results are expected to make an important contribution to the development of evidence-based treatment recommendations for SCAD, improve care and quality of life for patients worldwide.

Tutkimuksen yleiskatsaus

Yksityiskohtainen kuvaus

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD) is an important cause of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), predominantly in younger women. Evidence to guide optimal antiplatelet therapy is limited. Although dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is commonly prescribed, observational studies have linked DAPT to higher rates of adverse cardiovascular events in conservatively managed SCAD. The SCAD-ALIGN trial is an international, prospective, randomized, open-label, group-sequential adaptative, blinded endpoint-adjudicated with two-parallel groups, multicenter trial comparing an intensive APT strategy versus a moderate APT strategy in patients with ACS due to SCAD who are treated conservatively, i.e., without revascularization. The SCAD-ALIGN study will define the benefit-risk balance of these strategies, inform international guideline committees, and clarify optimal treatment strategies. To demonstrate the superiority of a moderate intensity APT strategy compared to an intensive treatment regimen in patients presenting with an ACS caused by SCAD with planned conservative management with regard to major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite endpoint consisting of all-cause mortali-ty, myocardial infarction, recurrent SCAD, unplanned coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, or transient ischemic attack 12 months after randomization was chosen.

Opintotyyppi

Interventio

Ilmoittautuminen (Arvioitu)

3518

Vaihe

  • Vaihe 4

Yhteystiedot ja paikat

Tässä osiossa on tutkimuksen suorittajien yhteystiedot ja tiedot siitä, missä tämä tutkimus suoritetaan.

Opiskeluyhteys

Tutki yhteystietojen varmuuskopiointi

Opiskelupaikat

      • Nieuwegein, Alankomaat, 3435 CM
        • Division of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital
        • Ottaa yhteyttä:
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Kanada, V5Z 1M9
        • Division of Cardiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia
        • Ottaa yhteyttä:
      • Linköping, Ruotsi, SE-581 83
        • Department of Cardiology and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University
        • Ottaa yhteyttä:
    • Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg
      • Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg, Saksa, 20246
        • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
        • Ottaa yhteyttä:
      • Leicester, Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta, LE1 5WW
        • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
        • Ottaa yhteyttä:

Osallistumiskriteerit

Tutkijat etsivät ihmisiä, jotka sopivat tiettyyn kuvaukseen, jota kutsutaan kelpoisuuskriteereiksi. Joitakin esimerkkejä näistä kriteereistä ovat henkilön yleinen terveydentila tai aiemmat hoidot.

Kelpoisuusvaatimukset

Opintokelpoiset iät

  • Aikuinen
  • Vanhempi Aikuinen

Hyväksyy terveitä vapaaehtoisia

Ei

Kuvaus

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥18 years.
  2. Presentation with an Acute Coronary Syndrome.
  3. Suspected SCAD on coronary angiography (determined by the local investigator).
  4. Planned conservative treatment of SCAD.
  5. Intensive as well as moderate treatment of SCAD is possible.
  6. Ability to understand the patient information and to personally sign and date the informed consent to participate in the study, before completing any study-related procedures.
  7. The patient is cooperative and available for the entire study.
  8. Written and informed consent.
  9. For women of childbearing potential: Patient is willing to use adequate contraceptive precautions during the study (until 12 Month FU)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Hypersensitivity to the study medication.
  2. Any indication for oral anticoagulation.
  3. Any indication for APT (including thienopyridines, non-thienopyridines, ASA and other anti-thrombotic agents) other than SCAD.
  4. Cardiogenic shock at the time of screening.
  5. Coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring secondary preventive therapy with APT.
  6. Life threatening bleeding (BARC type ≥3) at the time of screening.
  7. Active bleeding, such as peptic ulcer, tumor bleeding or intracranial hemor-rhage at the time of screening.
  8. History of major bleeding, BARC class ≥3 within 3 months before study in-clusion.
  9. Known bleeding diathesis.
  10. Known coagulopathy or refusal of blood transfusion.
  11. Planned surgery or intervention at high bleeding risk during the study period.
  12. Co-administration of contraindicated medications as follows: other P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor); anticoagulants (warfarin, new oral antico-agulants, or chronic therapy with subcutaneous anticoagulants); cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitors (fluoxetine, moclobemid or voriconazole); probenecid; high dose of methotrexate (≥15 mg/week); lithium.
  13. Known pregnancy or lactation.
  14. Current participation in another clinical trial with drugs or medicinal products.

Opintosuunnitelma

Tässä osiossa on tietoja tutkimussuunnitelmasta, mukaan lukien kuinka tutkimus on suunniteltu ja mitä tutkimuksella mitataan.

Miten tutkimus on suunniteltu?

Suunnittelun yksityiskohdat

  • Ensisijainen käyttötarkoitus: Hoito
  • Jako: Satunnaistettu
  • Inventiomalli: Rinnakkaistehtävä
  • Naamiointi: Yksittäinen

Aseet ja interventiot

Osallistujaryhmä / Arm
Interventio / Hoito
Kokeellinen: moderate APT
moderate APT therapy, defined as 3 months ASA followed by cessation of APT
3 months ASA monotherapy, dose accoring to international guidelines and local Standard of Care
Active Comparator: intensive APT
intensive APT therapy, defined as 3 months DAPT (ASA + clopidogrel), followed by 9 months of clopidogrel monotherapy
3 months ASA + clopidgrel DAPT, followed by 9 months of clopidogrel monotherapy, doses accoring to international guidelines and local Standard of Care

Mitä tutkimuksessa mitataan?

Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events) with all-cause-mortality
Aikaikkuna: 12 months follow-up
MACE as a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, recurrent SCAD, unplanned coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, or transient is-chemic attack
12 months follow-up

Toissijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
First secondary endpoint: MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events) with cardiovascular mortality
Aikaikkuna: 12 months follow-up
Composite endpoint consisting of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, recurrent SCAD, unplanned coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, or transient ischemic attack
12 months follow-up
second secondary endpdoint: NACE (Net adverse clinical events)
Aikaikkuna: 12 months follow-up
composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, recurrent SCAD, unplanned coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and Bleeding aca-demia research consortium (BARC) bleeding types 3 or 5
12 months follow-up
MACE
Aikaikkuna: 3 Months follow-up
composite endpoint consisting of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, recurrent SCAD, unplanned coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, or transient ischemic attack
3 Months follow-up
all-cause mortality
Aikaikkuna: 3 months FU
3 months FU
all-cause mortality
Aikaikkuna: 12 months FU
12 months FU
cardiovascular mortality
Aikaikkuna: 3 months FU
3 months FU
cardiovascular mortality
Aikaikkuna: 12 months FU
12 months FU
myocardial infarction
Aikaikkuna: 3 months FU
3 months FU
myocardial infarction
Aikaikkuna: 12 months FU
12 months FU
recurrent SCAD
Aikaikkuna: 3 months FU
3 months FU
recurrent SCAD
Aikaikkuna: 12 months FU
12 months FU
unplanned coronary revascularization
Aikaikkuna: 3 months FU
3 months FU
unplanned coronary revascularization
Aikaikkuna: 12 months FU
12 months FU
ischemic stroke
Aikaikkuna: 3 months FU
3 months FU
ischemic stroke
Aikaikkuna: 12 months FU
12 months FU
transient ischemic attack
Aikaikkuna: 3 months FU
3 months FU
transient ischemic attack
Aikaikkuna: 12 months FU
12 months FU
NACE
Aikaikkuna: 3 months FU
composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, recurrent SCAD, unplanned coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and BARC bleeding types 3 or 5
3 months FU
BARC bleeding type 1, 2, 3 or 5
Aikaikkuna: 3 months FU
3 months FU
BARC bleeding type 1, 2, 3 or 5
Aikaikkuna: 12 months FU
12 months FU
Menorrhagia associated quality of life
Aikaikkuna: 3 months FU
assessed with Menorrhagia multi-attribute scale (MMAS), consisting of 6 dimensions with 4-level Likert scale for responses
3 months FU
Menorrhagia associated quality of life
Aikaikkuna: 12 months FU
assessed with Menorrhagia multi-attribute scale (MMAS), consisting of 6 dimensions with 4-level Likert scale for responses
12 months FU
MACE
Aikaikkuna: 3 Months follow-up
composite endpoint consisting of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, recurrent SCAD, unplanned coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, or transient ischemic attack
3 Months follow-up
Health-related Quality of Life
Aikaikkuna: 3 months FU
assessed with EQ5D-5L questionnaire, consisting of 5 domains with 5-level Likert scale and a visual analogue self-rating scale (VAS) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best)
3 months FU
Health-related Quality of Life
Aikaikkuna: 12 months FU
assessed with EQ5D-5L questionnaire, consisting of 5 domains with 5-level Likert scale and a visual analogue self-rating scale (VAS) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best)
12 months FU
Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-8
Aikaikkuna: 3 months FU
self-administered version of the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders diagnostic Instrument for common mental disorders. The PHQ-8 is the depression module, which scores each of the 8 diagnostic criteria for major depression in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Fourth Edition using a 4-level Likert scale
3 months FU
Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-8
Aikaikkuna: 12 months FU
self-administered version of the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders diagnostic Instrument for common mental disorders. The PHQ-8 is the depression module, which scores each of the 8 diagnostic criteria for major depression in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Fourth Edition using a 4-level Likert scale
12 months FU
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) questionnaire
Aikaikkuna: 3 months FU
screening tool to identify probable cases of GAD and to assess symptom severity. 7 items and 4-level Likert-scale
3 months FU
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) questionnaire
Aikaikkuna: 12 months FU
screening tool to identify probable cases of GAD and to assess symptom severity. 7 items and 4-level Likert-scale
12 months FU

Yhteistyökumppanit ja tutkijat

Täältä löydät tähän tutkimukseen osallistuvat ihmiset ja organisaatiot.

Opintojen ennätyspäivät

Nämä päivämäärät seuraavat ClinicalTrials.gov-sivustolle lähetettyjen tutkimustietueiden ja yhteenvetojen edistymistä. National Library of Medicine (NLM) tarkistaa tutkimustiedot ja raportoidut tulokset varmistaakseen, että ne täyttävät tietyt laadunvalvontastandardit, ennen kuin ne julkaistaan ​​julkisella verkkosivustolla.

Opi tärkeimmät päivämäärät

Opiskelun aloitus (Arvioitu)

Maanantai 1. maaliskuuta 2027

Ensisijainen valmistuminen (Arvioitu)

Maanantai 28. helmikuuta 2033

Opintojen valmistuminen (Arvioitu)

Maanantai 28. helmikuuta 2033

Opintoihin ilmoittautumispäivät

Ensimmäinen lähetetty

Tiistai 2. kesäkuuta 2026

Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Sunnuntai 28. kesäkuuta 2026

Ensimmäinen Lähetetty (Todellinen)

Maanantai 6. heinäkuuta 2026

Tutkimustietojen päivitykset

Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu (Todellinen)

Maanantai 6. heinäkuuta 2026

Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Sunnuntai 28. kesäkuuta 2026

Viimeksi vahvistettu

Perjantai 1. toukokuuta 2026

Lisää tietoa

Tähän tutkimukseen liittyvät termit

Yksittäisten osallistujien tietojen suunnitelma (IPD)

Aiotko jakaa yksittäisten osallistujien tietoja (IPD)?

PÄÄTTÄMÄTÖN

IPD-suunnitelman kuvaus

to be determined as global study with various stakeholders and country-specific requirements.

Lääke- ja laitetiedot, tutkimusasiakirjat

Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää lääkevalmistetta

Ei

Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää laitetuotetta

Ei

Nämä tiedot haettiin suoraan verkkosivustolta clinicaltrials.gov ilman muutoksia. Jos sinulla on pyyntöjä muuttaa, poistaa tai päivittää tutkimustietojasi, ota yhteyttä register@clinicaltrials.gov. Heti kun muutos on otettu käyttöön osoitteessa clinicaltrials.gov, se päivitetään automaattisesti myös verkkosivustollemme .

Tilaa