- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07686211
Deformable Tissue Modelling and Augmented Reality Based Guidance for Head and Neck Tumor Re-Resection Task (SPeAR)
Head and neck cancers have one of the highest recurrence rates among solid malignancies, and recurrence is strongly correlated with overall survival. Reducing recurrence rates depends, in part, on the surgeon's ability to accurately re-resect areas of positive or close margins during surgery. Currently, margin status is communicated primarily through verbal descriptions between the surgeon and pathologist, which can be imprecise. This challenge is further compounded by the deformable nature of soft tissues, as once the specimen is resected, the shape and size of the specimen change, making it difficult to accurately map the specimen's margins back onto the surgical site.
Emerging technologies -such as augmented reality (AR), 3D scanning, and advanced soft tissue modeling- offer promising solutions for improving surgical navigation and precision. Building on these advances, an AR-based surgical navigation system was developed specifically for head and neck tumor resections. The system uses a 3D scanner to generate virtual models of both the resected specimen and the patient's surgical site, as demonstrated in prior work. A soft tissue modeling algorithm is then applied to account for specimen shrinkage and deformation, enabling accurate tracking of positive tumor margins. This guidance information is visualized through an AR headset, which overlays the margin data directly onto the patient's surgical site, providing surgeons with real-time visual guidance during re-resection.
In this study, the goal is to evaluate the benefits and usability of this novel navigation software, compared to the standard of care. By assessing surgeon performance and user experience in cadaveric tasks with and without the AR system to identify strengths, limitations, and opportunities for refinement of the system, ultimately advancing surgical precision and improving patient outcomes by reducing recurrence rates.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Augmented reality (AR) technology, combined with computer vision algorithms, offers significant potential to enhance surgical visualization by generating GPS-like spatial maps over the patient's anatomy. This study aims to evaluate the usability and impact of our AR surgical guidance system, delivered through Microsoft HoloLens 2 (or equivalent AR/VR goggles such as Magic Leap or Apple Vision Pro), among surgeons while they complete various surgical tasks on cadaveric specimens. Specifically, an assessment of how the AR system influences surgeon performance and user experience during tasks such as suturing and specimen relocation, performed both with and without AR assistance.
Task accuracy (e.g., resection precision) will be measured and survey responses will be collected to assess the system's usability, ease of use, and comfort. Building on prior work where the investigators validated the feasibility and accuracy of AR-guided surgical holograms, this study focuses on advancing the evaluation of the system's usability and impact on performance. The goal is to generate insights into the application of AR guidance in head and neck tumor resection, ultimately contributing to improved intraoperative surgical precision and patient outcomes.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Jie Ying Wu Assistant Professor of Computer Science, PhD
- Phone Number: 615-343-4996
- Email: JieYing.Wu@vanderbilt.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
- Recruiting
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Jie Ying Wu Assistant Professor of Computer Science, PhD
- Phone Number: 615-343-4996
- Email: JieYing.Wu@vanderbilt.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Post-graduate year 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 (PGY2-5) resident physicians. (no age limit)
- Surgical fellows.
- Attending physicians.
- Prior cadaver lab or surgical experience.
- Any surgeon, regardless of training and experience, who has been involved in the surgeon-pathologist interaction during surgical resection for frozen section and margin clearance assessment.
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Non-physician surgery providers.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Augmented Reality (AR)
Participants will be asked to localize simulated margins on tissue resection beds on a fresh-frozen cadaver head. Specimens of skin, buccal, or tongue tissue will be resected by the research team beforehand. Participants will be asked to place pins or stitches where the indicated targets are located. These positions will be recorded by the research team. Participants will first receive oral guidance only, corresponding to common descriptions between pathologists and surgeons. Participants will then reproduce the same task with AR guidance. In this case, the target will be displayed in the see-through AR headset. The target will be overlaid on the resection bed site and follow your head's movements. |
Task accuracy will be evaluated by measuring distances between the points identified with and without AR guidance, and the pathologist-intended target locations. Participants will then complete post-tasks surveys and interviews. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Performance Task accuracy (e.g., resection precision)
Time Frame: within 90 minutes of AR-guided use
|
Surgeon performance of target re-localization compared with and without the AR-headset.
|
within 90 minutes of AR-guided use
|
|
User Experience
Time Frame: immediately after the AR-guided task.
|
Assess AR usability, ease of use, and comfort, through surgeon feedback surveys
|
immediately after the AR-guided task.
|
|
Accuracy of overlay alignment
Time Frame: within 90 minutes of completing the AR-guided task.
|
This will validate the accuracy of overlay alignment through landmark-based (tumor margin relocation) error metrics, which support precision of re-resection tasks.
|
within 90 minutes of completing the AR-guided task.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michael Topf, MD, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 251090
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Physician
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedPhysician Well-being | Physician Job SatisfactionUnited States
-
University of FloridaCompletedQuality/Accuracy of Physician Documentation | Efficiency of Physician DocumentationUnited States
-
Indiana UniversityCompletedPhysician BehaviorUnited States
-
Emory UniversityWithdrawnPhysician WorkflowUnited States
-
Jules Bordet InstituteUniversité Catholique de Louvain; Université Libre de Bruxelles; Université de... and other collaboratorsUnknownPhysician Patient RelationshipBelgium
-
American Medical AssociationJohns Hopkins University; University of California, San Francisco; University... and other collaboratorsUnknownPhysician Work Motivation
-
University of MichiganAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)CompletedPhysician-Patient RelationsUnited States
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...CompletedPostpartum | Physician RoundsUnited States
-
University of WashingtonCompletedPhysician Work Environment | Physician Burnout | Artificial Intelligence (AI)United States
-
Boehringer Labs LLCUnknown
Clinical Trials on Augmented Reality
-
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research InstituteNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); National Institutes of Health (NIH)Completed
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterVanderbilt University; National Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering...Recruiting
-
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaUniversity of BolognaRecruiting
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalWithdrawnPain | Infection | MalignancyUnited States
-
University of PittsburghNortheastern University; NSFRecruiting
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterVanderbilt University; National Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering...Completed
-
Koç UniversityKoc University HospitalCompleted
-
Wayne State UniversityActive, not recruitingSpecific Phobia, AnimalUnited States
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteUniversity of Western Ontario, CanadaCompletedCentral Line ComplicationCanada
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterVanderbilt University; National Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering...Completed