TBE Zone 0/1 PMS in Japan

July 6, 2026 updated by: W.L.Gore & Associates

GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis Zone 0/1 Post-Market Surveillance in Japan

The goal of this surveillance is to confirm the safety and efficacy of TBE under actual use in the Zone 0/1 lesion on post-marketing usage conditions.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

75

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who attempted implant of TBE in Zone 0/1 during the enrollment period for each indication (including patients in whom TBE is not placed in Zone 0/1 area).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Those who are suitable for use of TBE according to the Japan package insert. [Reference: Purpose of Use or Effects of TBE at the time of launch] The GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis is intended for use in patients with the following diseases of the aortic arch and descending thoracic aortic lesions who fulfill anatomical requirements for treatment of such diseases while preserving blood flow to a single aortic arch target branch vessel.

  • Thoracic aortic aneurysm
  • Traumatic transection
  • Complicated Stanford type A (after surgical repair) and B aortic dissection (including dissecting aortic aneurysm) who have not responded to medical therapy

The GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis may be used in combination with designated stent grafts with validated efficacy and safety.

Exclusion Criteria:

N/A

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Aneurysm cohort

Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm: 50 patients (including at least 5 surgically repaired patients who have the proximal landing zone that is a surgical graft)

Before 5 surgically repaired patients are enrolled if the other 45 patients are confirmed to be enrolled, enrollment of the other patients will be considered complete at that point, and only surgically repaired patients will continue to be enrolled.

Patients who attempted implant of TBE in Zone 0/1 during the enrollment period for each indication (including patients in whom TBE is not placed in Zone 0/1 area).
Dissection and Traumatic Transection cohort
  • Complicated chronic Stanford type B aortic dissection (including dissecting aneurysm): at least 10 patients, and enrollment will be considered complete when the enrollment of 15 patients is confirmed.
  • Complicated Stanford type A (after surgical repair) aortic dissection: at least 10 patients, and enrollment will be considered complete when the enrollment of 15 patients is confirmed.

If, during the enrollment period for the dissection and traumatic transection cohort, an attempt is made to place TBE in patients with complicated acute Stanford type B aortic dissection or in patients with traumatic thoracic aortic transection, those patients will also be enrolled in the dissection and traumatic transection cohort.

Patients who attempted implant of TBE in Zone 0/1 during the enrollment period for each indication (including patients in whom TBE is not placed in Zone 0/1 area).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Aortic Rupture of the Treatment Lesion
Time Frame: 60 Months
Rupture in the treated segment of the vessel (e.g., aorta or branch) verified with direct observation or CT / CTA scan.
60 Months
Serious Paraplegia
Time Frame: 60 Months
Paraplegia secondary to spinal cord ischemia reported as a serious adverse event from sites.
60 Months
Serious Paraparesis
Time Frame: 60 Months
Paraparesis secondary to spinal cord ischemia reported as a serious adverse event from sites.
60 Months
Renal Failure Requiring Dialysis
Time Frame: 60 Months
Renal failure reported as a serious adverse event by sites and confirmed to require dialysis.
60 Months
Serious Device-related Ischemia
Time Frame: 60 Months
Ischemia reported by sites as a serious adverse event determined to be related to the device.
60 Months
Distal Device-related Thromboembolic Serious Adverse Event Requiring Intervention or Surgery
Time Frame: 60 Months
Device-related ischemic adverse events reported by sites as serious adverse events that required bypass surgery, surgical procedures, or amputation, or that resulted in death.
60 Months
Serious Myocardial Infarction
Time Frame: 60 Months
Myocardial infarction reported as a serious adverse event by the sites.
60 Months
Serious Laryngeal or Phrenic Nerve Injury
Time Frame: 60 Months
Nerve damage events reported by the sites as serious adverse events that required retreatment.
60 Months
Serious Heart Failure/Hypotension
Time Frame: 60 Months
Heart failure or hypotension reported as serious adverse events by the sites.
60 Months
Device Technical Success at the Initial Endovascular Procedure
Time Frame: TBE Initial Implant Procedure

All of the following must be met.

  • Successful access and delivery
  • Patency of devices
  • The absence of unanticipated additional procedure related to the device, the TBE implant procedure, or withdrawal of the delivery system
TBE Initial Implant Procedure
Lesion-related Mortality and All-cause Death
Time Frame: 60 Months

Lesion-related Mortality that meet any of the following criteria:

  • All deaths within 30 days after the revascularization procedure or the TBE implant procedure during the initial hospitalization or secondary procedures resulting from the treated lesion or endovascular treatment (e.g., procedures for retrograde dissection, loss of patency, loss of device integrity, endoleak, migration, aortic dilation, aneurysm rupture)
  • All deaths related to the treated lesion or device (e.g., aneurysm rupture, retrograde dissection resulting in fatal cardiac tamponade) Not applicable if there is evidence to support no relationship to the lesion.
60 Months
Disabling Stroke
Time Frame: 60 Months

Stroke is the acute onset of symptoms consistent with focal or multifocal central nervous system (CNS) injury caused by vascular blockage resulting in ischemia or vascular rupture resulting in hemorrhage, that:

Persists for > 24 hours or until death

60 Months
Additional Unanticipated Post-procedural Reintervention
Time Frame: 60 Months

Additional unanticipated surgical procedure or endovascular procedure related to TBE, TBE implant procedure, or revascularization procedure for TBE implant after the revascularization procedure or TBE implant procedure.

Anticipated or unanticipated status will be determined at the discretion of the investigator.

Surgical procedures include conversion to thoracotomy. Endovascular procedures include stent graft implants for endoleaks, aortic enlargement and loss of patency, and procedures on the branch to improve or restore patency.

Events will not include access site(s) complications, interventions to address issues related to non-treated area of the index lesion, such as bare stent implant to address bowel ischemia associated with aortic dissection.

60 Months
Serious New Dissection
Time Frame: 60 Months
New events of aortic dissection reported as serious adverse events by sites.
60 Months
Aortic Enlargement in the Region Encompassed by the Initial Lesion
Time Frame: 60 Months
An increase of 5 mm or more in arterial diameter at the treated area compared to images taken at the first follow-up after the TBE implant procedure.
60 Months
Endoleak
Time Frame: 60 Months

Serious adverse events reported or confirmed by imaging by the sites.

The definitions of each type of endoleaks are as follows:

  • Type I endoleak is defined as a sealing failure at one of the attachment sites of the graft to the vessel wall. Arterial flow therefore leaks alongside the graft and into the perigraft space.
  • Type Ia: Proximal leak
  • Type Ib: Distal leak
  • Type Ic: Inadequate seal at distal landing zone for side branch component
  • Type II endoleak is defined as retrograde flow from branch arteries arising from the treated segment of the aorta.
  • Type III endoleak
  • Type IIIA endoleak : Attachment of aortic components (aortic-aortic).
  • Type IIIB endoleak : Fabric tear or disruption.
  • Type IIIC endoleak : Attachment of aortic component-side-branch or side-branch-side-branch
  • Type IV endoleak is defined as flow through porous fabric.
  • Indeterminate : Endoleak detected with unknown source.
60 Months
Loss of Device Integrity
Time Frame: 60 Months

Defined as any of the following:

  • Wire fractures identified in the sealing row stents of the aortic component (AC), branch component (SB) or aortic extender (AE).
  • Stent kinking: Narrowing of the stent graft associated with demonstrable angulation in any of the stent components, with demonstrable flow
  • Disruption / tears in the graft component of the stent graft
  • Transient (compression) or permanent stent-graft collapse (invagination) following complete device deployment, resulting in an overall reduction in the aortic or branch vessel luminal diameter.
  • If the device loses function due to other malformations
60 Months
Loss of Aortic or Aortic Branch Patency
Time Frame: 60 Months
No flow or contrast detected through the implanted aortic or side branch devices or distal CTAG devices after the TBE implant procedure.
60 Months
Migration
Time Frame: 60 Months
Longitudinal movement of all or part of the device for a distance ≥10 mm, as confirmed by imaging, relative to anatomical landmarks and device positioning at the first post-operative imaging.
60 Months
False Lumen Perfusion through the Primary Entry Tear (Dissection Patients only)
Time Frame: 60 Months
Confirm the presence or absence of blood flow from a proximal aortic source through the primary entry tear into the aortic false lumen, based on imaging.
60 Months
Extension of a Dissection (Proximally or Distally) (Dissection Patients only)
Time Frame: 60 Months
Among the aortic dissections reported by sites as serious adverse events, those in which proximal or distal progression of the lesion from the TBE implant procedure was confirmed on imaging.
60 Months
False Lumen Status in Treated and Untreated Segments (Dissection Patients only)
Time Frame: 60 Months

The thrombosis state of the false lumen at the treated and untreated segments at the TBE implant procedure is confirmed using the following three stages.

  • Patent is defined as flow present throughout the aortic false lumen in the absence of evidence of thrombus.
  • Partially thrombosed false lumen is defined as clot within the aortic false lumen that has a residual patent flow channel.
  • Thrombosed false lumen is defined as complete thrombosis of the aortic false lumen.
60 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2035

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2035

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trauma

Clinical Trials on Gore® TAG® Thoracic Aortic Branch Stent Graft System

3
Subscribe