Moderate-Intensity Treadmill Walking With Blood Flow Restriction Improves Pulmonary Volumes in Older Adults

July 7, 2026 updated by: Sebastian Norambuena Meza, Universidad Santo Tomas, Chile
This quasi-experimental pilot study evaluated the effect of 12 months of moderate-intensity treadmill walking with blood flow restriction (BFR) on pulmonary function in 14 trained older women. Participants were allocated to either a BFR group (30-40% arterial occlusion pressure) or a control group without BFR. Both groups completed the same aerobic exercise program three times per week. The BFR group showed significant improvements in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) and forced vital capacity (FVC), along with a reduction in resting heart rate, with no adverse events reported. These findings suggest that BFR is a safe and promising strategy to optimize respiratory function in older adults.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This quasi-experimental pilot study aimed to investigate whether a moderate-intensity treadmill walking program combined with blood flow restriction (BFR) could improve pulmonary function in trained older women. Fourteen physically active women (68.1 ± 3.6 years), free from major chronic diseases, were enrolled and allocated to either an intervention group (n = 7) or a control group (n = 7). The intervention group performed a modified Bruce treadmill protocol with BFR applied to both thighs at 30-40% of arterial occlusion pressure, whereas the control group completed the same training program without BFR. Both groups trained three times per week for 12 months, progressively advancing to stage 4 of the protocol.

Pulmonary function was assessed by spirometry every three months, measuring forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) and forced vital capacity (FVC). The BFR group demonstrated significant improvements in FEV₁, increasing from approximately 2.26 L to 3.10 L, particularly during the first six months of the intervention, representing an improvement of nearly 41%. FVC also showed progressive increases; however, between-group differences did not reach statistical significance. The control group exhibited smaller and generally non-significant improvements.

The authors suggest that these benefits may be explained by mechanisms related to the metabolic stress induced by BFR, activation of the respiratory metaboreflex, and stimulation of anabolic signaling pathways such as Akt/mTOR, which may promote adaptations in the respiratory musculature. Additionally, hemodynamic parameters remained within safe ranges throughout the intervention, and no adverse events were reported, supporting the safety of the method.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Santiago, Chile, 8320000
        • Clinica Oces

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women aged 60 to 80 years without a diagnosis of chronic non-communicable diseases.
  • Physically active individuals.
  • At least 3 consecutive months of participation in structured exercise programs.
  • Weekly physical activity volume ≥ 180 minutes, assessed using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of ergogenic aids.
  • Current smoking habit.
  • Diagnosis of cardiometabolic diseases.
  • Presence of neurological disorders or musculoskeletal impairments affecting the lower extremities.
  • Peripheral vascular diseases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Brazo experimental:
Aerobic treadmill training combined with blood flow restriction (30-40% of arterial occlusion pressure).
Blood flow restriction was applied using 108 × 10 cm pneumatic cuffs (BodyPro®, Kinemax®) positioned at the proximal region of both thighs, approximately three finger-widths below the gluteal fold. Occlusion pressure was set at 30-40% of each participant's arterial occlusion pressure, which was determined using sphygmomanometry and an 8-MHz vascular Doppler probe placed over the posterior tibial artery. Blood flow restriction was maintained continuously throughout the treadmill walking sessions based on the modified Bruce protocol. The intervention lasted 12 months and was performed three times per week.
Active Comparator: Brazo comparador/control:
Aerobic treadmill training without blood flow restriction.
Participants completed the same modified Bruce treadmill walking program, matched for frequency and duration, without blood flow restriction.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV₁)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months (although quarterly assessments were performed, the primary analysis was based on pre- and post-intervention measurements).
Assessed by spirometry to determine changes in pulmonary function from baseline to 12 months of intervention. FEV₁ was expressed in liters (L) and compared between the blood flow restriction group and the control group.
Baseline and 12 months (although quarterly assessments were performed, the primary analysis was based on pre- and post-intervention measurements).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • No publications are currently available for this study protocol.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 25, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

March 2, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All individual participant data (IPD) underlying a publication.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Older Women

Clinical Trials on Blood Flow Restriction

3
Subscribe