Interoceptive Awareness, Perceived Stress, and Physical Performance in Sport Sciences Students

July 6, 2026 updated by: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Özgür EKEN, Inonu University

Examining the Relationships Between Interoceptive Awareness, Perceived Stress, and Physical Performance Indicators: The Moderator Role of Gender and Sport Type

This cross-sectional observational study examined the relationships between interoceptive awareness, perceived stress, state and trait anxiety, sleep quality, and physical performance indicators in university-level sport sciences students. A total of 85 undergraduate students (54 males, 31 females; mean age = 20.65 ± 2.43 years) from the Faculty of Sport Sciences at Inonu University participated. Participants completed self-report measures (MAIA-2, PSS-10, STAI, PSQI) and a physical performance battery including handgrip strength, countermovement jump, sit-and-reach flexibility, and Y-Balance test. The study also investigated the moderator role of gender and sport type (team vs. individual) in these relationships, and tested the parallel mediating roles of perceived stress, trait anxiety, and sleep quality using PROCESS Model 4 with 5,000 bootstrap resamples.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Interoceptive awareness - the perception, interpretation, and regulation of internal bodily signals - has emerged as a psychological resource relevant to sport performance and mental health. However, empirical evidence linking interoceptive awareness to objective physical performance outcomes in athletic populations remains limited, particularly regarding potential psychological mediators such as perceived stress, anxiety, and sleep quality.

Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to examine the direct and mediated relationships between interoceptive awareness and physical performance indicators in university sport sciences students. The secondary objectives were to investigate (a) the parallel mediating roles of perceived stress, trait anxiety, and sleep quality; and (b) the differences in study variables based on gender and sport type (team vs. individual).

Methods: This cross-sectional observational study included 85 undergraduate students (54 males, 31 females) enrolled at the Faculty of Sport Sciences, Inonu University. Data collection was conducted between May 11 and May 17, 2026. Psychological measures included the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA-2), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Physical performance was assessed via handgrip strength (digital dynamometer), countermovement jump (My Jump 2 mobile application), sit-and-reach flexibility, and Y-Balance test (composite score). Statistical analyses included Pearson correlation, independent samples t-tests, hierarchical multiple regression, and parallel multiple mediation analysis (Hayes PROCESS Model 4; 5,000 bootstrap resamples).

Expected Outcomes: The study aims to clarify whether interoceptive awareness contributes to physical performance directly or indirectly through psychological mediators, and to determine whether such relationships are moderated by demographic and sport-related factors.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

85

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Malatya
      • Malatya, Malatya, Turkey (Türkiye), 44280
        • Inonu University, Faculty of Sport Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Undergraduate students enrolled at the Faculty of Sport Sciences, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey. The sample comprised 85 participants (54 males, 31 females; mean age = 20.65 ± 2.43 years) with diverse sport backgrounds, including team-sport athletes (n = 44), individual-sport athletes (n = 32), and students not actively participating in a specific sport branch (n = 9). Participants were recruited via convenience sampling during the Spring 2026 semester.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrollment as an undergraduate student at the Faculty of Sport Sciences, Inonu University
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Voluntary willingness to participate in the study
  • Provision of written informed consent
  • Absence of acute injury or illness on the day of measurement

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute musculoskeletal injury or illness at the time of measurement
  • Failure or refusal to provide written informed consent
  • Incomplete data on primary study measures
  • Any contraindication to physical performance testing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Sport Sciences Students
Undergraduate students enrolled at the Faculty of Sport Sciences, Inonu University. Participants included both team-sport athletes (n = 44) and individual-sport athletes (n = 32), with an additional 9 participants who did not report an active sport branch. Mean age was 20.65 ± 2.43 years (54 males, 31 females).
Participants completed a battery of self-report psychological measures (MAIA-2, PSS-10, STAI State-Trait, PSQI) followed by a standardized physical performance testing session including handgrip strength (digital dynamometer), countermovement jump (My Jump 2 mobile application), sit-and-reach flexibility test, and Y-Balance test. All assessments were conducted in a single 45-minute session per participant.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interoceptive Awareness - MAIA-2 Total Score
Time Frame: Single measurement at baseline (cross-sectional)
Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, Version 2 (MAIA-2) total score. The MAIA-2 is a 37-item self-report questionnaire assessing eight dimensions of interoceptive awareness (Noticing, Not-Distracting, Not-Worrying, Attention Regulation, Emotional Awareness, Self-Regulation, Body Listening, Trusting). Higher scores indicate greater interoceptive awareness. Total score is calculated as the mean of all 37 items (range: 0-5).
Single measurement at baseline (cross-sectional)
Handgrip Strength
Time Frame: Single measurement at baseline (cross-sectional)
Maximal handgrip strength (kg) measured using a digital hand dynamometer (Baseline Model 12-0286). Participants performed three trials with the dominant hand in a standing position with the elbow in full extension. The highest of three trials was recorded, with 30-second rest between trials.
Single measurement at baseline (cross-sectional)
Sit-and-Reach Flexibility
Time Frame: Single measurement at baseline (cross-sectional)
Dynamic balance and neuromuscular control assessed using the Y-Balance Test. Participants reached in anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions while standing on one leg. Composite scores (%) were calculated for both right and left legs, normalized to leg length.
Single measurement at baseline (cross-sectional)
Countermovement Jump Height
Time Frame: Single measurement at baseline (cross-sectional)
Vertical jump height (cm) assessed using the My Jump 2 mobile application, a validated iPhone-based tool for measuring jump performance. Participants performed three maximal countermovement jumps with hands on hips and knee flexion of approximately 90°. The highest value was recorded, with 60-second rest between trials.
Single measurement at baseline (cross-sectional)
Y-Balance Test Composite Score
Time Frame: Single measurement at baseline (cross-sectional)
Dynamic balance and neuromuscular control assessed using the Y-Balance Test. Participants reached in anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions while standing on one leg. Composite scores (%) were calculated for both right and left legs, normalized to leg length.
Single measurement at baseline (cross-sectional)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
State Anxiety - STAI-S Total Score
Time Frame: Single measurement at baseline (cross-sectional)
State Anxiety subscale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S) total score. Consists of 20 items rated on a 4-point Likert scale, assessing current anxiety level. Higher scores indicate higher state anxiety (range: 20-80).
Single measurement at baseline (cross-sectional)
Trait Anxiety - STAI-T Total Score
Time Frame: Single measurement at baseline (cross-sectional)
Trait Anxiety subscale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T) total score. Consists of 20 items rated on a 4-point Likert scale, assessing general tendency toward anxiety. Higher scores indicate higher trait anxiety (range: 20-80).
Single measurement at baseline (cross-sectional)
Sleep Quality - PSQI Global Score
Time Frame: Single measurement at baseline; assesses sleep quality during the past month.
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global score. Assesses sleep quality over the past month across seven components: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction. Global score ranges from 0 to 21, with scores greater than 5 indicating poor sleep quality.
Single measurement at baseline; assesses sleep quality during the past month.
Perceived Stress - PSS-10 Total Score
Time Frame: Single measurement at baseline; assesses stress experienced during the past month.
Perceived Stress Scale, 10-item version (PSS-10) total score. Assesses the degree to which participants perceived life events as stressful during the past month. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = never to 4 = very often); items 4, 5, 7, and 8 are reverse-scored. Higher scores indicate higher perceived stress (range: 0-40).
Single measurement at baseline; assesses stress experienced during the past month.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 11, 2026

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 17, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

May 17, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on Psychological and Physical Performance Assessment Battery

3
Subscribe