Selective Median Lobe Surgery Outcomes Study (UNVEIL-BPO)

July 9, 2026 updated by: Selim Soyturk, Necmettin Erbakan University

UNVEIL-BPO Median Lobe Study: An International Multicenter Evaluation of Selective Median Lobe Resection and Enucleation

This prospective multicenter observational cohort study will evaluate clinical outcomes after selective median lobe transurethral surgery for benign prostatic obstruction. Eligible men with lower urinary tract symptoms or urinary retention who are scheduled for selective median lobe-only TURP, HoLEP, or anatomical endoscopic enucleation as part of routine clinical care will be enrolled and followed after surgery.

The study will collect preoperative clinical data, symptom scores, uroflowmetry, postvoid residual volume, prostate volume, intravesical prostatic protrusion measurements, cystoscopic anatomical findings, intraoperative variables, and postoperative outcomes. The primary outcome is composite clinical failure at 12 months.

The main aim is to identify practical preoperative urology-based anatomical and functional predictors of clinical failure after selective median lobe surgery and to develop an exploratory prediction model that may help improve patient selection in future practice.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Selective median lobe transurethral surgery is used in selected men with benign prostatic obstruction in whom the median lobe or high bladder neck median component is considered the dominant obstructive anatomy. This approach may provide urinary improvement while potentially reducing ejaculatory dysfunction compared with complete transurethral prostate surgery. However, some patients may experience persistent or recurrent symptoms because of residual lateral lobe obstruction, unfavorable bladder neck anatomy, insufficient functional improvement, or bladder dysfunction.

This study is designed as a prospective multicenter observational cohort. The surgical decision and the choice of technique will not be assigned by the study protocol. Patients will undergo selective median lobe TURP, selective median lobe HoLEP, or selective median lobe anatomical endoscopic enucleation according to the treating surgeon's routine clinical judgment.

The study will evaluate whether preoperative urology-based variables can predict 12-month clinical failure. Candidate predictors include intravesical prostatic protrusion length or grade, cystoscopic median lobe morphology, lateral lobe obstruction score, bladder neck configuration, baseline symptom burden, storage symptom burden, uroflowmetry pattern, Qmax, and postvoid residual volume. Intraoperative variables, including procedure type, energy platform, extent of lateral lobe treatment, bladder neck management, operative time, tissue weight, catheter duration, and complications will also be recorded.

The primary endpoint is 12-month composite clinical failure, defined by inadequate symptom improvement, inadequate functional improvement, persistent voiding failure, restart of BPH-related medication, recurrent urinary retention or need for recatheterization after the early postoperative period, need for reintervention, or patient-reported global failure due to insufficient urinary benefit.

Secondary outcomes include changes in IPSS, quality of life, uroflowmetry parameters, postvoid residual volume, durability of response, medication-free survival, reintervention-free survival, preservation of antegrade ejaculation, de novo ejaculatory dysfunction, urinary incontinence, urethral stricture, bladder neck contracture, and Clavien-Dindo complications.

The study will also explore the performance of a practical urology-based Median Lobe Failure Index. This index will be evaluated as an exploratory tool only and will not be used to guide clinical decision-making during the study.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

420

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Edremit
      • Van, Edremit, Turkey (Türkiye), 65140
        • University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Van Training and Research Hospital
        • Contact:
    • Konya
      • Konya, Konya, Turkey (Türkiye), 42090
        • Necmettin Erbakan University, Meram Faculty of Medicine
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Selcuk Guven, MD, Professor

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Men aged 45 years or older with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms or urinary retention attributed to benign prostatic obstruction, in whom preoperative evaluation suggests median lobe-dominant or median lobe-related obstruction and who are scheduled to undergo selective median lobe transurethral surgery as part of routine clinical care at participating centers.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male patients aged 45 years or older.

    • Moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction or urinary retention requiring transurethral surgery.
    • Preoperative findings suggesting median lobe-dominant or median lobe-related obstruction.
    • Planned selective median lobe-only TURP, HoLEP, or anatomical endoscopic enucleation as part of routine clinical care.
    • Available baseline International Prostate Symptom Score, uroflowmetry and/or postvoid residual volume, prostate volume, intravesical prostatic protrusion measurement, and cystoscopic assessment.
    • Ability to provide written informed consent and comply with the follow-up schedule.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous prostate surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
  • Known urethral stricture requiring treatment before or during the index procedure.
  • Known neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.
  • Active prostate cancer or bladder cancer requiring treatment that may confound urinary outcomes.
  • Planned complete TURP, complete HoLEP/AEEP, or lateral lobe-dominant surgery.
  • Severe kissing lateral lobe obstruction considered to require complete surgery rather than selective median lobe surgery.
  • Inability to provide valid baseline or follow-up outcome data.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Selective Median Lobe TURP
Men undergoing selective transurethral resection of the median lobe for benign prostatic obstruction as part of routine clinical care, without planned complete lateral lobe resection.
Selective transurethral resection of the median lobe or median component of the bladder outlet. The procedure is performed according to the treating surgeon's routine clinical practice and is not assigned by the study protocol.
Other Names:
  • MLO-TURP
  • Median lobe-only TURP
Selective Median Lobe HoLEP/AEEP
Men undergoing selective median lobe holmium laser enucleation or another anatomical endoscopic enucleation technique for benign prostatic obstruction as part of routine clinical care, without planned complete gland enucleation.
Selective enucleation of the median lobe or median component of the bladder outlet using HoLEP or another anatomical endoscopic enucleation platform. The procedure is performed according to the treating surgeon's routine clinical practice and is not assigned by the study protocol.
Other Names:
  • ML-HoLEP
  • Selective median lobe HoLEP
  • Selective median lobe anatomical endoscopic enucleation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Participants With Composite Clinical Failure at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery
Composite clinical failure is defined as the presence of at least one of the following within 12 months or at the 12-month assessment: inadequate symptom improvement, inadequate functional improvement, persistent voiding failure, restart of BPH-related medication due to recurrent or persistent voiding symptoms, recurrent urinary retention or need for recatheterization after the early postoperative period, need for reintervention, or patient-reported global failure due to insufficient urinary benefit.
12 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in International Prostate Symptom Score Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery
Change in International Prostate Symptom Score total score from baseline to postoperative follow-up visits. Higher scores indicate more severe lower urinary tract symptoms.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery
Change in International Prostate Symptom Score Voiding Subscore
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery
Change in International Prostate Symptom Score voiding subscore from baseline to postoperative follow-up visits.Higher scores indicate more severe lower urinary tract symptoms
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery
Change in International Prostate Symptom Score Storage Subscore
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery
Change in International Prostate Symptom Score storage subscore from baseline to postoperative follow-up visits.Higher scores indicate more severe lower urinary tract symptoms
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery
Change in International Prostate Symptom Score Quality of Life Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery
Change in International Prostate Symptom Score quality of life score from baseline to postoperative follow-up visits. Higher scores indicate worse disease-specific quality of life.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery
Change in Maximum Urinary Flow Rate
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery
Change in maximum urinary flow rate measured by uroflowmetry from baseline to postoperative follow-up visits.
Baseline, 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery
Change in Postvoid Residual Volume
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery
Change in postvoid residual urine volume from baseline to postoperative follow-up visits.
Baseline, 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery
Proportion of Participants Restarting BPH-Related Medication
Time Frame: Up to 24 months after surgery
Proportion of participants who restart medication for benign prostatic hyperplasia or lower urinary tract symptoms after the early postoperative period because of persistent or recurrent symptoms.
Up to 24 months after surgery
Proportion of Participants Requiring BPH-Related Reintervention
Time Frame: Up to 24 months after surgery
Proportion of participants requiring additional intervention for benign prostatic obstruction, including bladder neck incision, repeat TURP, repeat HoLEP or AEEP, lateral lobe surgery, or another BPH-related surgical procedure.
Up to 24 months after surgery
Proportion of Participants With Preserved Antegrade Ejaculation
Time Frame: 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery
Proportion of Participants With Preserved Antegrade Ejaculation
3 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery
Proportion of Participants With De Novo Ejaculatory Dysfunction
Time Frame: 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery
Proportion of participants reporting new ejaculatory dysfunction after surgery among those without ejaculatory dysfunction at baseline.
3 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery
Proportion of Participants With Postoperative Adverse Events or Late Anatomical Complications
Time Frame: Up to 24 months after surgery
Proportion of participants with postoperative adverse events or late anatomical complications, including urinary incontinence, urethral stricture, bladder neck contracture, urinary tract infection, urinary retention, bleeding, or other complications classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system when applicable.
Up to 24 months after surgery

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance of the Exploratory Urology-Based Median Lobe Failure Index
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery
Exploratory evaluation of the Urology-Based Median Lobe Failure Index for predicting 12-month composite clinical failure. Model performance will be assessed using discrimination, calibration, and overall predictive performance measures. The index will not be used for clinical decision-making during the study.
12 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data underlying the published results may be made available upon reasonable request after publication, subject to approval by the study steering committee and applicable ethics, institutional, and data protection regulations.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Clinical Trials on Selective Median Lobe TURP

3
Subscribe