Ejaculation Preservation After Laser Enucleation Prostate (EPALEP)

A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating the Benefit of Median Lobe Preservation on the Incidence of Retrograde Ejaculation During Prostate Enucleation by HoLEP.

A multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the benefit of median lobe preservation on the incidence of retrograde ejaculation during prostate enucleation by HoLEP.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The main objective of the study is to compare the incidence of retrograde ejaculation at 6 months in patients undergoing Holep surgery for prostatic adenoma according to two randomized surgical techniques: conventional surgical procedure of removal of the 3 prostatic lobes versus preservation of the median lobe.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

11

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lyon, France, 69009
        • Clinique de la Sauvegarde

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 40 years and older who have signed their consent to participate in the study
  • Patient with preserved cognitive functions
  • Patient with BPH characterised by an IPSS score ≥ 12, a Qmax ≤ 15 ml/s and an ultrasound-assessed prostate volume between 40 and 150 cc
  • Patient for whom an indication for prostatic resection by HoLEP has been made,
  • A patient who is sexually active and willing to maintain sexual activity after surgery
  • Patient affiliated to a social security system or beneficiary of such a system

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of prostate surgery or prostate radiotherapy
  • Urethral stenosis
  • Cancer or a history of cancer
  • Patient with a life expectancy of less than 2 years
  • Patient refusing partial surgery
  • History of vasectomy, erectile dysfunction or ejaculation
  • Mental deficiency or any other reason that may hinder the understanding or the strict application of the protocol
  • Patient under court protection, guardianship or curatorship
  • Patient already included in another therapeutic study protocol or having participated in another trial in the previous three months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: HoLEP classic
Standard HoLEP prostate resection procedure with enucleation of all three lobes (3-lobe, 2-lobe or monobloc technique).
Standard HoLEP prostate resection procedure with enucleation of all three lobes (3-lobe, 2-lobe or monobloc technique).
Experimental: HoLEP with median lobe preservation
Enucleation of the lateral lobes and preservation of the medial tissue between the bladder neck and Veru montanum.
Enucleation of the lateral lobes and preservation of the medial tissue between the bladder neck and Veru montanum

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Retrograde ejaculation
Time Frame: Month 6
Existence of retrograde ejaculation at Month 6, as evidenced by the presence of spermatozoa in the urine following sexual intercourse (as evidenced by an ECBU performed within 24 hours of intercourse)
Month 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
International Prostate Symtom Score (IPSS) assessment
Time Frame: Month 1
The International Prostate Symtom Score (IPSS) is a structured and validated self-administered questionnaire that assesses the intensity and discomfort of lower urinary tract disorders. It consists of 7 questions on symptomatology with answers rated from 0 to 5 and one question on quality of life. A score of <7 is mild, a score of 8-19 is moderate and a score of >20 is severe
Month 1
International Prostate Symtom Score (IPSS) assessment
Time Frame: Month 3
The International Prostate Symtom Score (IPSS) is a structured and validated self-administered questionnaire that assesses the intensity and discomfort of lower urinary tract disorders. It consists of 7 questions on symptomatology with answers rated from 0 to 5 and one question on quality of life. A score of <7 is mild, a score of 8-19 is moderate and a score of >20 is severe
Month 3
International Prostate Symtom Score (IPSS) assessment
Time Frame: Month 6
The International Prostate Symtom Score (IPSS) is a structured and validated self-administered questionnaire that assesses the intensity and discomfort of lower urinary tract disorders. It consists of 7 questions on symptomatology with answers rated from 0 to 5 and one question on quality of life. A score of <7 is mild, a score of 8-19 is moderate and a score of >20 is severe
Month 6
International Prostate Symtom Score (IPSS) assessment
Time Frame: Month 12
The International Prostate Symtom Score (IPSS) is a structured and validated self-administered questionnaire that assesses the intensity and discomfort of lower urinary tract disorders. It consists of 7 questions on symptomatology with answers rated from 0 to 5 and one question on quality of life. A score of <7 is mild, a score of 8-19 is moderate and a score of >20 is severe
Month 12
Men Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ) score assessment
Time Frame: Month 3

The Men Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ) assesses a patient's ability to have sex. It consists of 25 questions that explore the ability to have erections, the quality of ejaculations and the satisfaction felt during intercourse and sexual desire.

The total score (16 to 125 points maximum) is broken down into 6 sub-scores that explore erection (0 to 15 points), discomfort with erection problems (1 to 5 points), ejaculation (1 to 35 points), discomfort with ejaculation problems (1 to 5 points), satisfaction (6 to 30 points), sexual activity and desire (7 to 35 points)

Month 3
Men Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ) score assessment
Time Frame: Month 6

The Men Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ) assesses a patient's ability to have sex. It consists of 25 questions that explore the ability to have erections, the quality of ejaculations and the satisfaction felt during intercourse and sexual desire.

The total score (16 to 125 points maximum) is broken down into 6 sub-scores that explore erection (0 to 15 points), discomfort with erection problems (1 to 5 points), ejaculation (1 to 35 points), discomfort with ejaculation problems (1 to 5 points), satisfaction (6 to 30 points), sexual activity and desire (7 to 35 points)

Month 6
Men Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ) score assessment
Time Frame: Month 12

The Men Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ) assesses a patient's ability to have sex. It consists of 25 questions that explore the ability to have erections, the quality of ejaculations and the satisfaction felt during intercourse and sexual desire.

The total score (16 to 125 points maximum) is broken down into 6 sub-scores that explore erection (0 to 15 points), discomfort with erection problems (1 to 5 points), ejaculation (1 to 35 points), discomfort with ejaculation problems (1 to 5 points), satisfaction (6 to 30 points), sexual activity and desire (7 to 35 points)

Month 12
International Index of Erectil Function (IIEF-5) score assessment
Time Frame: Month 3
The IIEF-5 (International Index of Erectile Function) questionnaire consists of 5 questions that assess erectile function over the past 6 months. Severe erectile dysfunction corresponds to a score of 5-10, moderate erectile dysfunction to a score of 11-15 and mild erectile dysfunction to a score of 16-20. A score of 21 to 25 corresponds to normal erectile function and scores between 1 and 4 are not interpretable.
Month 3
International Index of Erectil Function (IIEF-5) score assessment
Time Frame: Month 6
The IIEF-5 (International Index of Erectile Function) questionnaire consists of 5 questions that assess erectile function over the past 6 months. Severe erectile dysfunction corresponds to a score of 5-10, moderate erectile dysfunction to a score of 11-15 and mild erectile dysfunction to a score of 16-20. A score of 21 to 25 corresponds to normal erectile function and scores between 1 and 4 are not interpretable.
Month 6
International Index of Erectil Function (IIEF-5) score assessment
Time Frame: Month 12
The IIEF-5 (International Index of Erectile Function) questionnaire consists of 5 questions that assess erectile function over the past 6 months. Severe erectile dysfunction corresponds to a score of 5-10, moderate erectile dysfunction to a score of 11-15 and mild erectile dysfunction to a score of 16-20. A score of 21 to 25 corresponds to normal erectile function and scores between 1 and 4 are not interpretable.
Month 12
Urine flow (Qmax) measurement
Time Frame: Month 1
Assessment of urine flow (Qmax) by ultrasound
Month 1
Urine flow (Qmax) measurement
Time Frame: Month 3
Assessment of urine flow (Qmax) by ultrasound
Month 3
Urine flow (Qmax) measurement
Time Frame: Month 6
Assessment of urine flow (Qmax) by ultrasound
Month 6
Urine flow (Qmax) measurement
Time Frame: Month 12
Assessment of urine flow (Qmax) by ultrasound
Month 12
Adverse events related to the procedure
Time Frame: Month 12
Presence of urinary incontinence and occurrence of adverse events related to the procedure
Month 12
Assessment of resected volume / total volume
Time Frame: Month 12
Assessment of resected volume / total volume assessed by ultrasound
Month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Arnaud BALDINI, MD PD, Clinique de la Sauvegarde

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Hyperplasia

Clinical Trials on HoLEP classic

Subscribe