- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07700927
Sola2 AMF Knee System Added to Surgery and Antibiotics in Adults With Knee Implant Infection (AMPLIFY)
Acute Management of PJI With Local Implant Retention and Antibiotics Using the Sola2 AMF Knee System: A Multicenter Double-blind Clinical Trial.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether the Sola2 AMF Knee System, when added to surgery and antibiotic treatment, can safely improve outcomes, knee function, and quality of life in adults with knee implant infection.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
- Whether adding the Sola2 AMF Knee System improves knee function and quality of life at 6 months.
- Whether adding the Sola2 AMF Knee System to surgery and antibiotic treatment affects the need for additional infection-related surgery.
- Whether the Sola2 AMF Knee System can be used safely, based on device-related adverse events through 12 months.
This study has two stages. In Stage 1, participants will be enrolled into sequential sentinel groups at increasing AMF temperature levels. All sentinel participants will receive active Sola2 AMF treatment. A safety review will occur after each sentinel group before proceeding to the next group. In Stage 2, researchers will compare participants who receive active Sola2 AMF treatment to participants who receive sham AMF treatment. All participants will receive surgery called debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), and antibiotic treatment for knee implant infection.
Participants will:
- Have DAIR surgery for knee implant infection;
- Receive pathogen-appropriate antibiotic treatment from the study doctor;
- If enrolled in Stage 1, receive active Sola2 AMF treatment at the designated sentinel temperature level;
- If enrolled in Stage 2, receive either active Sola2 AMF treatment or sham AMF treatment, depending on randomization assignment; and
- Complete follow-up visits and assessments for safety, infection status, pain, knee function, x-rays, laboratory tests, and other study-related outcomes.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
The AMPLIFY trial is a prospective, multicenter, staged clinical investigation of the investigational Sola2 AMF Knee System in adults with confirmed knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) who will undergo debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) surgery and pathogen-appropriate antibiotic therapy.
The study is conducted under a single Investigational Device Exemption and includes two stages. Stage 1 is an open-label sentinel stage using sequential AMF temperature escalation. Sentinel participants receive active Sola2 AMF treatment, with safety review after each sentinel group before progression to the next planned temperature level or to the randomized stage. Stage 2 is a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled stage in which participants are assigned to active Sola2 AMF treatment or sham AMF treatment.
The Sola2 AMF Knee System is an external, non-contacting investigational device that generates alternating magnetic fields intended to produce controlled heating at metallic knee implant surfaces. The AMF or sham treatment is administered in the operating room in conjunction with the planned DAIR procedure. All participants receive DAIR and pathogen-appropriate antibiotic therapy as part of their clinical care.
Safety oversight includes medical monitoring, independent Data Safety Monitoring Board review, and independent Clinical Events Committee adjudication as specified in the protocol.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Vice President Clinical Operations
- Phone Number: 711 U.S.: 877-765-2612
- Email: denise.stamos@solenic.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Chief Medical Officer
- Phone Number: 703 U.S.: 877-765-3612
- Email: david.greenberg@solenic.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria
Eligible participants must meet all of the following criteria:
- Adult male or female participant aged ≥ 22 years at the time of surgery.
- PJI diagnosis of "infected" knee per the 2018 MSIS Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection.
- Patient presents with PJI symptoms lasting for ≤ 45 days.
- Well-fixed and functioning prosthesis during clinical exam at screening.
- Patient to be treated with DAIR, polyethylene spacer exchange and pathogen- appropriate antibiotic therapy.
- Implanted knee prosthesis must appear on the "AMPLIFY Implant List".
- All implanted knee prosthesis components must have a legible device identification label (implant sticker) available in the medical record.
- Able to comprehend and comply with postoperative instructions and willing to return for follow-up visits for the duration of the study.
- Consent to participate in study and sign the Informed Consent Form (ICF).
Exclusion Criteria
Participants meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded:
- Implanted knee prosthesis not appearing on the "AMPLIFY Implant List".
- Implanted knee prosthesis has any femoral and/or tibial augments, sleeves, cones, or modified/extended stems.
- Un-resurfaced patella.
- Metal-backed patellar components.
- Patients not indicated for a DAIR procedure pre-operatively.
- Patients undergoing bilateral DAIR procedures during the same surgical session.
- Pre-operative determination that the surgical wound cannot be closed primarily and requires a wound vac as a method of wound closure (e.g., open wound managed for secondary intention healing or delayed primary closure); Use of closed-incision negative pressure therapy over a primarily closed incision is permitted.
- Previous DAIR procedure(s) performed on the affected knee joint within the last two years.
- Patients presenting with PJI symptoms lasting for >45 days.
- Patients on antibiotic therapy for an infection other than PJI of the knee.
- Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 45.
- Patients currently on bone-marrow suppressive chemotherapy for malignancy.
- Patients currently with active neutropenia.
- Presence of metallic implant(s), other than the femoral and tibial components, within the Sola2 treatment zone (+/- 20 centimeters from the knee joint line) including intramedullary nails, hip prosthesis femoral stem, or fracture fixation hardware.
- Patients with an upper-thigh circumference greater than 70 centimeters (cm) (28 inches (in), measured approximately 15 cm (6 in) proximal to the superior pole of the patella.
- Patients with implanted or nonremovable cardiac pacemakers, defibrillators or cardioverters, insulin pumps, nerve stimulators, or any other indwelling infusion pump.
- Patients who are pregnant or nursing.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Arm 1: Stage 1 Sentinel Group A: Active Sola 2 AMF Treatment 55C
Participants in the first open-label sentinel group receive active Sola2 AMF treatment at the planned 55°C AMF temperature level.
Participants receive two active AMF treatments in the operating room, one before DAIR and one after DAIR and wound closure/bandaging.
Safety data are reviewed before progression to the next sentinel group.
|
Active alternating magnetic field treatment is delivered using the investigational Sola2 AMF Knee System.
The system is an external, non-contacting device that generates alternating magnetic fields intended to produce controlled heating at metallic knee implant surfaces.
Treatment is administered in the operating room in conjunction with DAIR.
Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention is the planned surgical treatment for participants with knee prosthetic joint infection participants.
In this study, all participants undergo DAIR, including polyethylene spacer exchange, and receive pathogen-appropriate antibiotic therapy as part of standard clinical care.
|
|
Experimental: Arm 2: Stage 1 Sentinel Group B: Active Sola 2 AMF Treatment 60°C
Participants in the second open-label sentinel group receive active Sola2 AMF treatment at the planned 60°C AMF temperature level.
Participants receive two active AMF treatments in the operating room, one before DAIR and one after DAIR and wound closure/bandaging.
Enrollment in this group occurs only after safety review supports progression from Sentinel Group A.
|
Active alternating magnetic field treatment is delivered using the investigational Sola2 AMF Knee System.
The system is an external, non-contacting device that generates alternating magnetic fields intended to produce controlled heating at metallic knee implant surfaces.
Treatment is administered in the operating room in conjunction with DAIR.
Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention is the planned surgical treatment for participants with knee prosthetic joint infection participants.
In this study, all participants undergo DAIR, including polyethylene spacer exchange, and receive pathogen-appropriate antibiotic therapy as part of standard clinical care.
|
|
Experimental: Arm 3: Stage 1 Sentinel Group C: Active Sola 2 AMF Treatment 65°C
Participants in the third open-label sentinel group receive active Sola2 AMF treatment at the planned 65°C AMF temperature level.
Participants receive two active AMF treatments in the operating room, one before DAIR and one after DAIR and wound closure/bandaging.
Enrollment in this group occurs only after safety review supports progression from Sentinel Group B.
|
Active alternating magnetic field treatment is delivered using the investigational Sola2 AMF Knee System.
The system is an external, non-contacting device that generates alternating magnetic fields intended to produce controlled heating at metallic knee implant surfaces.
Treatment is administered in the operating room in conjunction with DAIR.
Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention is the planned surgical treatment for participants with knee prosthetic joint infection participants.
In this study, all participants undergo DAIR, including polyethylene spacer exchange, and receive pathogen-appropriate antibiotic therapy as part of standard clinical care.
|
|
Experimental: Arm 4: Stage 2 Randomized Active AMF Treatment
Participants randomized to the active treatment arm receive active Sola2 AMF treatment in conjunction with DAIR and pathogen-appropriate antibiotic therapy.
Participants receive two active AMF treatments in the operating room, one before DAIR and one after DAIR and wound closure/bandaging.
|
Active alternating magnetic field treatment is delivered using the investigational Sola2 AMF Knee System.
The system is an external, non-contacting device that generates alternating magnetic fields intended to produce controlled heating at metallic knee implant surfaces.
Treatment is administered in the operating room in conjunction with DAIR.
Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention is the planned surgical treatment for participants with knee prosthetic joint infection participants.
In this study, all participants undergo DAIR, including polyethylene spacer exchange, and receive pathogen-appropriate antibiotic therapy as part of standard clinical care.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Arm 5: Stage 2 Randomized Sham AMF Treatment
Participants randomized to the sham treatment arm receive sham AMF treatment in conjunction with DAIR and pathogen-appropriate antibiotic therapy.
Participants undergo the same treatment timing and device-use steps as the active treatment arm, but active AMF energy is not delivered.
|
Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention is the planned surgical treatment for participants with knee prosthetic joint infection participants.
In this study, all participants undergo DAIR, including polyethylene spacer exchange, and receive pathogen-appropriate antibiotic therapy as part of standard clinical care.
Sham alternating magnetic field treatment is delivered during the randomized stage using the Sola2 AMF Knee System workflow.
The sham treatment uses the same treatment timing and device-use steps as active treatment, without delivery of active alternating magnetic field energy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
|
Change from baseline to 6 months in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement.
The score is reported using the validated 0 to 100 interval scoring method, with higher scores indicating better knee health.
|
Baseline to 6 months
|
|
Incidence of Infection-Related Surgical Reintervention
Time Frame: From the index DAIR procedure through the primary efficacy analysis, triggered when 24 adjudicated events have occurred and at least 100 participants have completed 12-month follow-up
|
Number and percentage of participants with a qualifying infection-related surgical reintervention event, as adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee.
Qualifying events include surgical reintervention due to relapse or surgical reintervention for ongoing infection, as defined in the protocol.
Only the first adjudicated qualifying surgical reintervention event per participant contributes to the primary endpoint analysis.
|
From the index DAIR procedure through the primary efficacy analysis, triggered when 24 adjudicated events have occurred and at least 100 participants have completed 12-month follow-up
|
|
Incidence of AMF Study Device-Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: Through 12 months post-procedure
|
Number and percentage of participants with one or more adverse events determined to be related to the AMF study device.
Potential primary safety endpoint events are independently adjudicated by the Clinical Events Committee according to the CEC charter.
|
Through 12 months post-procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence, Severity, and Relatedness of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: Through 12 months post-procedure
|
Between-arm comparison of the incidence, severity, and relatedness of adverse events and serious adverse events.
|
Through 12 months post-procedure
|
|
Time to Resolution and Duration of PJI-Related Signs and Symptoms
Time Frame: Through 12 months post-procedure
|
Between-arm comparison of the time to resolution and duration of PJI-related signs and symptoms, such as pain, drainage, erythema, and edema.
|
Through 12 months post-procedure
|
|
Proportion of Participants With Resolution or Marked Improvement of Infection-Related Symptoms
Time Frame: Through 12 months post-procedure
|
Between-arm comparison of the proportion of participants with resolution or marked improvement of infection-related symptoms at scheduled follow-up visits.
|
Through 12 months post-procedure
|
|
Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale Pain Score
Time Frame: Baseline through 12 months post-procedure
|
Between-arm comparison of change from baseline in participant-reported pain using the Numeric Rating Scale at scheduled follow-up visits.
Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater pain.
|
Baseline through 12 months post-procedure
|
|
Change From Baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement at Follow-Up Visits Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline through 12 months post-procedure
|
Between-arm comparison of change from baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement at scheduled follow-up visits other than the 6-month primary endpoint.
Scores are reported using the validated 0 to 100 interval scoring method, with higher scores indicating better knee health.
|
Baseline through 12 months post-procedure
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Patient-Reported Health Status
Time Frame: Baseline through 12 months post-procedure
|
Between-arm comparison of change from baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System patient-reported health status at scheduled follow-up visits.
|
Baseline through 12 months post-procedure
|
|
Change From Baseline and Time to Normalization of C-Reactive Protein
Time Frame: Baseline through 12 months post-procedure
|
Between-arm comparison of change from baseline and time to normalization of C-reactive protein among participants with elevated C-reactive protein at enrollment.
Normalization is defined according to the reference range of the performing laboratory.
|
Baseline through 12 months post-procedure
|
|
Change From Baseline and Time to Normalization of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
Time Frame: Baseline through 12 months post-procedure
|
Between-arm comparison of change from baseline and time to normalization of erythrocyte sedimentation rate among participants with elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate at enrollment.
Normalization is defined according to the reference range of the performing laboratory.
|
Baseline through 12 months post-procedure
|
|
Proportion of Participants Achieving Biomarker Normalization
Time Frame: Through 12 months post-procedure
|
Proportion of Participants Achieving Biomarker Normalization
|
Through 12 months post-procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Adolph V. Lombardi, MD, Mount Carmel New Albany Surgical Hospital (JIS Orthopedics)
- Principal Investigator: Peter K Sculco, MD, Hospital of Special Surgery (New York)
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SOL-200-2025
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Prosthetic Joint Infection of Knee
-
University of MiamiNot yet recruitingProsthetic Joint Infection | Suture | Debridement With Prosthesis Retention | Prosthetic Joint Infections of Hip | Prosthetic Joint Infections of KneeUnited States
-
University of Newcastle, AustraliaUniversity of Sydney; University of Melbourne; Michael Garron Hospital; The University... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingProsthetic Joint Infections of Hip | Prosthetic Joint Infections of Knee | Large Joint Prosthetic Joint InfectionsAustralia
-
Trellis Bioscience LLCActive, not recruitingStudy to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TRL1068 for the Treatment of Prosthetic Joint InfectionProsthetic Joint Infections of Hip | Prosthetic Joint Infections of KneeUnited States
-
Arrevus Inc.TerminatedProsthetic Joint Infections of Hip | Prosthetic Joint Infections of Knee | Infected SpacersUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicTerminatedProsthetic Joint Infection of the KneeUnited States
-
Medtronic Surgical TechnologiesCompletedInfection of Total Knee Joint Prosthesis | Aseptic Loosening of Prosthetic JointGermany
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityCompletedProsthetic Joint Infection | Unicompartmental Knee ArthroplastyChina
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyUnknownHip Prosthetic Joint Infection | Knee Prosthetic Joint Infection | Shoulder Prosthetic Joint Infection
-
University of MiamiRecruitingTotal Knee Arthroplasty | Prosthetic-joint Infection | IrrigationUnited States
-
Vivantes Netzwerk für Gesundheit GmbHUnknownProsthetic Joint Infection | Infections Joint Prosthetic | Wear of Articular Bearing Surface of Internal Prosthetic Joint | Infection Prosthetic | Prosthetic PainGermany
Clinical Trials on Intervention 1: Alternating Magnetic Field Treatment
-
Cardiovascular Therapy LLCUnknown
-
KTO Karatay UniversityCompleted
-
KTO Karatay UniversityCompleted
-
The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityRecruitingFunctional Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Clinical Efficacy | Chronic Visceral Pain | IBS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome)China
-
Medipol UniversityCompletedConstipation | ElectrotherapyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Debiao KongNot yet recruitingStroke | Acupuncture Therapy | Motor Disorders | Upper Extremity | Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation RepetitiveChina
-
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingCurrent Smoker | Current Every Day Smoker | Cigarette SmokerUnited States
-
Ataturk UniversityCompletedTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation | Accelerated Protocol | Bilateral rTMS | Sham-controlled | Unipolar Major Depressive Disorder | Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
The Mind Research NetworkUniversity of New MexicoActive, not recruitingTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation | Traumatic Brain Injury | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Post-Concussion Syndrome | Neuropsychological TestsUnited States
-
Universidad Complutense de MadridNot yet recruiting