- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06757491
Lf-rTMS Attenuates Visceral Pain in Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea
Low-frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Attenuates Visceral Pain in Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea Via Inhibition of the Medial Prefrontal Cortex
Objectives: To identify a central hub of visceral pain in IBS-D and elucidate the mechanism by which repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) confers analgesic effects.
Methods: A total of 42 IBS-D patients were recruited and randomly assigned (1:1) to the sham rTMS or the rTMS group. A nested cohort of 21 IBS-D participants who completed baseline fMRI assessments prior to randomization was included. Consistent with the randomization procedure,these individuals were evenly distributed between the two groups. Both participants and outcome assessors remained blinded to treatment allocation throughout the study. All patients completed the two-week intervention and were included in the final analysis.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background:Chronic visceral pain in irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) is a profound therapeutic challenge. While aberrant central processing is implicated, the key brain regions driving this visceral pain and their suitability as neuromodulatory targets remain undefined.
Methods: Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to the sham rTMS or rTMS group using a computer-generated randomization sequence created by an independent researcher who was not involved in recruitment, treatment, or outcome assessment. Allocation concealment was ensured using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes, which were opened only after baseline evaluations were completed.
Both participants and outcome assessors were blinded to treatment allocation. The rTMS operators were not involved in data collection or analysis. For the sham condition, the coil was positioned identically over the mPFC with magnetic output disabled, and prerecorded clicking sounds were delivered to mimic the acoustic sensation of stimulation. Participants were asked not to discuss treatment sensations with assessors. Scale raters and fMRI analysts remained blinded until all analyses were finalized.
For the nested fMRI cohort, randomization and blinding procedures were identical, with group allocation revealed only after preprocessing and statistical analysis had been completed.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Ruixia Weng, Dr.
- Phone Number: 15206214921
- Email: wengruixia@suda.edu.cn
Study Locations
-
-
Jiangsu
-
Suzhou, Jiangsu, China, 215006
- Recruiting
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
-
Principal Investigator:
- Rui Li, Dr.
-
Contact:
- Shuangjie Wu
- Phone Number: +8651267972743
- Email: sdfyec@163.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Ruixia Weng
-
Contact:
- Email: lrhcsz@163.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham rTMS Group
For the sham rTMS group, the coil was placed over the mPFC with the rTMS function disabled, and pre-recorded acoustic artifacts were played to mimic the auditory experience of the rTMS group.
|
For the sham rTMS group, the coil was placed over the mPFC with the rTMS function disabled, and pre-recorded acoustic artifacts were played to mimic the auditory experience of the rTMS group.
|
|
Active Comparator: rTMS Group
Low-frequency rTMS (1 Hz) was applied to the mPFC using a TMS stimulator at 80% resting motion threshold intensity.
|
A figure-of-eight coil is used to apply active low-frequency (1 Hz) rTMS to the corresponding representation area of theprefrontal cortex (mPFC).
The treatment is administered for 20 minutes daily for a total of 2 weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visceral Sensitivity Index
Time Frame: 2 weeks of treatment
|
(1) Clinical control: After the course of treatment, clinical symptoms disappear; (2) Significant effect: After the course of treatment, the symptom grading is reduced by 2 levels; (3) Effective: After the course of treatment, the symptom grading is reduced by 1 level; (4) Ineffective: After treatment, those who do not meet the above standards.
|
2 weeks of treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
IBS-symptom severity score
Time Frame: 2 weeks of treatment
|
The criteria were based on the IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS), a hierarchical efficacy assessment method.The IBS-SSS consists of five entries assessing the degree of abdominal pain and discomfort, frequency of bdominal pain episodes, the degree of abdominal distension and discomfort, the degree of satisfaction with bowel habits and behaviors, and the degree of impact of intestinal symptoms on life,with a total score of 500 points.
A score of 75-175 is considered mild, 176-300 is moderate, and over 300 is severe.
Cure was defined as a total IBS symptom severity of less than 75; efficacy was defined as 2-level improvement in total score(e.g., symptoms improved from severe to mild); validity was defined as a 1-level improvement in tatal(e.g., symptoms improved from severe to moderate or symptoms from moderate to mild); and invalidity was defined as no improvement or deterioration in total score.
|
2 weeks of treatment
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
anorectal manometry
Time Frame: 2 weeks of treatment
|
Anorectal manometry was performed on the subjects before and after treatment and the subjects' rectal primary sensory thresholds were recorded.
Rectal initial sensory thresholds between 20-90ml were considered normal , less than 20ml was considered as sensitivity rectal sensory, and cure meant that the IBS patients had their rectal initial sensory recordings restored to between 20-90ml.
|
2 weeks of treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Rui Li, Dr., The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024-KY-08
- BE2023710 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Jiangsu Provincial Department of Science and Technology)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
-
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCCompletedFunctional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
-
Yale UniversityCompletedMagnetic Resonance Imaging, FunctionalUnited States
-
Neurological Associates of West Los AngelesEnrolling by invitationFunctional Magnetic Resonance ImagingUnited States
-
The University of Texas at DallasNational Institute on Aging (NIA); University of Texas Southwestern Medical...CompletedFunctional Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Cognitive AgingUnited States
-
Akdeniz UniversityCompletedFunctional Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Regional AnaesthesiaTurkey
-
Xuzhou Central HospitalThe Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingFunctional Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Executive Function Disorder
-
University Hospital TuebingenCompletedFunctional Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Eating Behavior | HabitsGermany
-
School of Health Sciences GenevaUniversity of Lausanne Hospitals; University of Geneva, SwitzerlandRecruitingMagnetic Resonance Imaging | Behavior | Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Music | Development, Child | Brain Imaging | Executive Functions | Brain Plasticity | Interventions | Arts | Structural Brain ConnectivitySwitzerland
-
University of BirminghamCompletedInhibition | Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Eating Behavior | HungerUnited Kingdom
-
The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityActive, not recruitingFunctional Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Maternal Care Patterns | Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)China
Clinical Trials on Sham (No Treatment)
-
Surf TherapeuticsRecruitingRheumatoid Arthritis (RAUnited States
-
AVeta MedicalNot yet recruitingGenitourinary Syndrome of MenopauseGeorgia, United States
-
New York Institute of TechnologyNot yet recruitingSleep | Parkinsons Disease
-
University of BathUniversity of BirminghamRecruitingSpinal Cord InjuryUnited Kingdom
-
Peking UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
University of ThessalyUniversity of NicosiaCompleted
-
Wynn Medical CenterRecruitingHidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)United States
-
XyloCor Therapeutics, Inc.RecruitingCoronary Artery Disease | Refractory AnginaUnited States
-
New York State Institute for Basic ResearchRecruitingAutism Spectrum Disorder | Executive DysfunctionUnited States