Antibiotic-coated Braided Suture Study

March 18, 2026 updated by: Colin A. McNamara, University of Miami

Evaluating the Use of Antibiotic-Coated Braided Sutures in Debridement, Antibiotic, and Implant Retention (DAIR) Procedures

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the use of antibiotic-coated (triclosan) braided sutures is non-inferior or potentially superior to standard monofilament sutures in patients with prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) managed with the DAIR protocol. Several studies in various surgical specialties have demonstrated the effectiveness and non-inferiority of triclosan-coated braided sutures in infected surgical cases, and the study intends to transpose this idea to the management of prosthetic joint infections. Monofilament sutures are the present standard of care in any infected joint case due their lower surface area for bacterial harborization, though surgeons sacrifice mechanical integrity and comfortability with the closure in the process. By demonstrating the safety of antibiotic -coated braided sutures, surgeons will no longer have to make this compromise.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

142

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33132
        • University of Miami Health System
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Colin McNamara, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent
  • Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty or Total Knee Arthroplasty with Prosthetic Joint Infection Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria
  • Prosthetic Joint Infection Treated with Debridement, Antibiotics, Implant Retention

Acute Prosthetic Joint Infection: <4 weeks since it was suspected/diagnosed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
  • Mycobacterial, fungal, or parasitic infection
  • Concurrent infection needing prolonged Intravenous therapy
  • Septic shock/systemic illness needing IV therapy
  • Patients with severe immunosuppression (ex: chemotherapy,

neutropenia, HIV, steroid use

  • Allergy to Triclosan
  • Pregnancy
  • Prisoners

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Triclosan-Braided Suture Group
Patients randomized to this arm will receive triclosan-coated braided sutures for closure of the fascia. Following incision and full debridement and irrigation, the fascia will be closed with this suture. Suturing of the fascia typically takes ~10 minutes. As this suture is absorbable, it does not have to be removed. The superficial layers of the skin will be closed with nylon suture.
Synthetic, absorbable, braided suture coated with triclosan for antimicrobial protection. Used for fascial and skin closure. Offers high tensile strength and knot security
Active Comparator: Monofilament Suture Group
Patients randomized to this arm will receive monofilament sutures for closure of the fascia. Following incision and full debridement and irrigation, the fascia will be closed with this suture. Suturing of the fascia typically takes ~10 minutes. As this suture is absorbable, it does not have to be removed. The superficial layers of the skin will be closed with nylon suture.
Absorbable, non-braided suture. Used for fascial and skin closure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients with treatment failure at 90 days
Time Frame: 90 days post treatment
Treatment failure is defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society Criteria for prosthetic joint infection, including persistent wound drainage, sinus tract formation, positive cultures, or need for surgical revision.The proportion will be calculated as the number of patients meeting any MSIS treatment-failure criterion divided by the total number of patients evaluated. Assessment will be based on clinical evaluation and microbiological data collected at 90 days post-treatment.
90 days post treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Net Cost Comparison of Triclosan-Coated Braided vs. Monofilament Sutures (USD per patient)
Time Frame: Within 90 days of surgery
A cost analysis will be conducted to compare the net expenses associated with the use of triclosan-coated braided absorbable sutures versus monofilament absorbable sutures for fascial and skin closure. The analysis will include direct material costs, operative time, and any postoperative complications requiring additional interventions.
Within 90 days of surgery
Incidence of Wound Dehiscence
Time Frame: Up to 90 days post-operative
Medical records will be reviewed for any documented wound dehiscence following surgery
Up to 90 days post-operative
Incidence of Superficial Site Infection
Time Frame: Up to 90 days post-operative
Medical records will be reviewed for any documented superficial surgical site infection
Up to 90 days post-operative
Incidence of Seroma Formation
Time Frame: Up to 90 days post-operative
Medical records will be reviewed for any documented seroma formation following surgery
Up to 90 days post-operative
Incidence of Delayed Wound Healing
Time Frame: Up to 90 days post-operative
Medical records will be reviewed for any documented delayed wound healing
Up to 90 days post-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Colin McNamara, MD, University of Miami

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 15, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prosthetic Joint Infection

Clinical Trials on VICRYL™ Plus (Coated VICRYL™ Plus Antibacterial)

Subscribe