Comparison Between Virtual vs in Person on Treatment Follow-up Visits of Radiotherapy

Transforming On-Treatment Follow-Up Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Virtual Versus In-Person Visits Evaluating Clinical Outcomes, Patient-Reported Measures, and Telehealth Implementation

This study aims to evaluate the logistical feasibility and implementation of virtual versus in-person on-treatment follow up visits in a high-volume radiation oncology setting. It further seeks to assess and compare patient and physician satisfaction with both modalities through structured survey data, providing insight into the clinical utility, communication quality, and overall acceptability of telehealth integration during active cancer treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Telemedicine and telehealth services, operationally defined as patient-provider interactions conducted through telecommunication technologies, have experienced widespread integration across diverse medical specialties. Prior to the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, numerous clinical disciplines had adopted telemedicine modalities to enhance healthcare accessibility and improve patient convenience. The COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath have precipitated an unprecedented acceleration in the adoption of telehealth services, profoundly reshaping healthcare delivery paradigms across multiple disciplines.

As of 2025, Pakistan continues to grapple with a substantial cancer burden, with more than 185,000 new cases and over 125,000 cancer-related deaths reported annually. Despite ongoing efforts to improve awareness, early detection, and treatment accessibility, major challenges persist-particularly regarding healthcare access in rural regions and the financial burden associated with cancer treatment. For patients undergoing primary treatment, the costs of travel, accommodation, and sustenance during treatment and follow-up visits constitute significant barriers. These economic constraints frequently result in missed appointments and treatment discontinuation, thereby compromising the effectiveness of established therapeutic protocols.

Addressing these barriers necessitates a multifaceted approach, including the strategic expansion of telemedicine services. Telehealth can serve as a vital tool to bridge gaps in cancer care accessibility, ensuring that patients receive timely and continuous treatment regardless of geographic location or socioeconomic status.

Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (SKMCH&RC) is a leading institution in Pakistan, delivering comprehensive oncologic care to a large patient population. In 2024 alone, approximately 83,000 patients received radiotherapy in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or palliative settings, underscoring the hospital's pivotal role in cancer management. As a high-volume cancer center, effective coordination of follow-up appointments and the maintenance of accurate clinical documentation are essential tasks that require seamless collaboration between patients and healthcare professionals.

Patients undergoing radiation therapy at SKMCH&RC were consecutively recruited and randomly assigned to either a hybrid follow-up group, receiving one virtual and one in-person appointment, or a control group receiving only in-person follow-ups. Clinical and demographic information was obtained from patient records. Following each visit, patients completed an anonymous, validated questionnaire survey assessing satisfaction, communication, and convenience. Additional logistical data, including appointment adherence, visit duration, and any technical difficulties during virtual visits, were systematically documented. All collected data were anonymized and stored securely to maintain confidentiality and support robust analysis of telehealth integration in on-treatment care.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

180

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Punjab Province
      • Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
        • Recruiting
        • Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer hospital & Research Centre
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All cancer patients requiring radiotherapy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who are 18 years and above.
  2. All patients who are undergoing radiotherapy (>5 fractions).
  3. Capacity to provide informed consent for participation in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients below 18 years
  2. Unable to provide informed consent for participation in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Inperson followup visits
Group A involves weekly in person followup visits in radiation department undergoing radiotherapy.
Hybrid virtual & inperson radiotherpay followup
Group B involves hybrid group with alternating 1 virtual and 1 in person followup visits in radiation department undergoing radiotherapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Outcomes of virtual vs in person on treatment of follow-up radiotherapy visits through structured questionnaire
Time Frame: 4 weeks
To evaluate the implementation of virtual and in person follow-up visits thereby accessing and comparing patient satisfaction with both modalities through structured questionnaire providing insights into clinical utility and overall acceptability of telehealth integration during active cancer treatment.
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Latif A, Usmani S, Sheikh A, et al. Bridging oncology gaps with telemedicine in low-resource settings. J Glob Oncol. 2023;9:1-8.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 11, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB-25-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Radiotherapy

Subscribe