Improving Patient-Centered Care for Underserved Older African American Patients With Cardiovascular Comorbidities (PPC Heart)

July 31, 2026 updated by: Deborah Ejem, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Improving Patient-Centered Care for Underserved Older African American Patients With Cardiovascular Comorbidities: A Pilot Study of the Patient Priorities Care Approach at Cooper Green Mercy Health Services Authority (PPC-HEART)

This is formative evaluation trial guided by the Values Clarification Theory25 and the Cultural Values Theory26, with specific aims to: Aim 1. Develop a culturally appropriate version of the PPC Approach for older AAs with CVCs by assembling a community advisory group of 3 primary care clinicians, 3 older AA patients with CVCs, and 3 AA persons who care for AA patients with CVCs to solicit feedback on the PPC Approach. Aim 2. Determine the acceptability (e.g., program appraisal interviews) and feasibility (e.g., avg. length of program sessions, program participation rate, study completion rate) of the PPC Approach among a sample 20 of under-resourced older southern AA patients with CVCs receiving primary care at Cooper Green Mercy Health Services Authority. Aim 3. Examine the ability of participants to complete pre- and post-test (8 weeks post-baseline) measures of perception of care, treatment burden, shared decision-making, and patient-clinician communication exchange.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

29

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • Recruiting
        • Cooper Green Mercy Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Deborah Ejem, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Cooper Green Mercy Hospital

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • greater than or equal to 50 years old
  • at least one CVD (i.e., coronary artery disease, hypertension, heart failure, arrhythmias, cardiomyopathy, peripheral artery disease, stroke, and valvular heart disease)
  • at least one coexisting chronic condition (i.e., inflammatory joint disease, COPD/asthma, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and cancer one-year post-treatment)
  • a caregiver of a participant, or a provider who serves this population.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Axis I psychiatric (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder), dementia, suicidal ideation,
  • active substance use disorder nursing home or assisted living facility residence.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Community Advisory Group (CAG) and Pilot Group

Nine of the 29 participants will participate in Aim 1 of the study, which involves convening a focus group to develop a culturally responsive version of the PPC Approach for underserved African Americans. This number was determined based on qualitative research best practices, which suggest that 6-10 participants per focus group allow for a diverse range of perspectives while maintaining an environment conducive to in-depth discussion. Additionally, this sample size aligns with previous studies that successfully used small, targeted focus groups to refine culturally tailored interventions.

Twenty patients will participate in the pilot testing of the newly developed culturally responsive version of the PPC Approach. This number was determined to be satisfactory because it provides a sufficient sample to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention while ensuring a manageable study scope. Prior feasibility studies have demonstrated that sample sizes between 15 and 30 par

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Older Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (O-PACIC) Score
Time Frame: Baseline and eight weeks post- baseline.
Patient experience with integrated care delivery and self-management support measured using the 10-item Older Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (O-PACIC) questionnaire. Responses to the 10 items will be summed to calculate a total score ranging from 10 to 50. Higher scores indicate more positive perceptions of chronic illness care. Scores will be reported at baseline and 8 weeks post-baseline, along with the change from baseline.
Baseline and eight weeks post- baseline.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ) Score
Time Frame: Baseline and eight weeks post- baseline
Perceived treatment burden measured using the 13-item Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ). Each item is rated from 0, indicating not a problem, to 10, indicating a big problem. Item scores will be summed to calculate a total score ranging from 0 to 130. Higher scores indicate greater perceived treatment burden. Scores will be reported at baseline and 8 weeks post-baseline, along with the change from baseline.
Baseline and eight weeks post- baseline
Perceived Shared Clinical Decision-Making (CollaboRATE Score)
Time Frame: Baseline and eight week post- baseline
Patient perception of involvement in shared decision-making measured using the 3-item CollaboRATE questionnaire. Responses to the three items will be averaged to calculate an overall mean score ranging from 1 to 9. Higher scores indicate greater perceived involvement in shared decision-making. Scores will be assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-baseline, and change from baseline will be evaluated.
Baseline and eight week post- baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Deborah Ejem, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 31, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data from this small pilot study will not be shared with other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe