- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07758439
PROMOTE: A Pilot and Feasibility Study (PROMOTE)
August 6, 2026 updated by: Paul Joudrey, University of Pittsburgh
PeRsOnalized MethOdone TrEatment (PROMOTE) by Implementing Shared Decision-making: A Pilot and Feasibility Study
To assess the feasibility and acceptability of implementing and evaluating shared decision making (SDM) within a single opioid treatment program (OTP) using Implementation Facilitation (IF), and to obtain pilot data on key implementation and effectiveness outcomes to inform a future full-scale hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness trial.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A combination of cross-sectional (surveys) during the study period and retrospective (Electronic Health Record data) following the study period.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
58
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Research Program Manager
- Phone Number: +1-412-624-7263
- Email: dmo36@pitt.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Arizona
-
Mesa, Arizona, United States, 85213
- Community Medical Services Mesa, AZ on Main
-
Contact:
- Clinic Manager
- Phone Number: 480-977-1500
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Mesa on Main, a single OTP clinic in Arizona operated by Community Medical Services (CMS), will participate as the pilot study site.
The investigators will enroll clients and healthcare professionals from Mesa on Main to participate in cross-sectional surveys, qualitative interviews, and EHR data collection.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
CLIENT INCLUSION CRITERIA
- Age ≥18 years old
- Receiving methadone treatment (i.e., self-report of ingestion of at least one administered or dispensed dose of methadone in past 7 days) at the pilot OTP
- Able and willing to provide informed consent
- Able to read and write in English or Spanish
HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL INCLUSION CRITERIA
- ≥18 years old
- Partners with clients to make methadone treatment decisions (e.g., peer navigator, physician, advanced practice provider, nurse, counselor)
- Able and willing to provide informed consent
- Able to read and write in English
CLIENT EHR INCLUSION CRITERIA
- ≥18 years old
- Documented receipt of at least one dose of methadone treatment (i.e., administrated or dispensed) from the participating OTP during a 6-month study period
SEMI-STRUCTURED INTERVIEW INCLUSION CRITERIA
- Clients and healthcare professionals eligible as described above may be included in semi-structured interviews. We will also include the OTP organizational leadership (e.g., clinic director, medical director, regional director). The investigators will purposively sample clients, healthcare professionals, and OTP leadership to contrast positional differences in experiences of SDM and its implementation. The investigators may modify this sampling approach based on preliminary results and advisory board feedback.
Exclusion Criteria:
CLIENT EXCLUSION CRITERIA
- Do not meet client inclusion criteria
- For the client survey, each client may complete the survey only once during the 6-month implementation period.
HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL EXCLUSION CRITERIA
- The investigators will exclude healthcare professionals who do not meet inclusion criteria
CLIENT EHR EXCLUSION CRITERIA
- The investigators will exclude clients who do not meet inclusion criteria
SEMI-STRUCTURED INTERVIEW EXCLUSION CRITERIA
- The investigators will exclude clients or healthcare professionals who do not meet inclusion criteria.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Patient Implementation Intervention
Implementation Facilitation (IF) is a systematic approach to integrating implementation activities to support and enable individual and organizational adoption of innovations.
The IF-based implementation intervention for shared decision making in a single opioid treatment program will occur over a period of 6 months.
Patient cohort -all consented patient participants will be exposed to the Implementation Intervention.
|
Implementation Facilitation (IF) is a systematic approach to integrating implementation activities to support and enable individual and organizational adoption of innovations.
IF will be tailored to support shared decision making in a single opioid treatment program (OTP) and will be implemented over a 6-month period to assess feasibility of this implementation intervention in an OPT setting.
|
|
Health Care Provider Implementation Intervention
Implementation Facilitation (IF) is a systematic approach to integrating implementation activities to support and enable individual and organizational adoption of innovations.
The IF-based implementation intervention for shared decision making in a single opioid treatment program will occur over a period of 6 months.
Health care provider (HCP) cohort -all consented HCP participants will be exposed to the Implementation Intervention.
|
Implementation Facilitation (IF) is a systematic approach to integrating implementation activities to support and enable individual and organizational adoption of innovations.
IF will be tailored to support shared decision making in a single opioid treatment program (OTP) and will be implemented over a 6-month period to assess feasibility of this implementation intervention in an OPT setting.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of client survey recruitment and data collection procedures
Time Frame: 6-month implementation period
|
Feasibility is defined as (a) recruiting n ≥ 50 clients who (b) complete the client survey during the pilot implementation period.
The investigators will calculate the frequency and proportion of clients (a) recruited (start the survey) and (b) who complete the survey.
|
6-month implementation period
|
|
Feasibility of observed client-healthcare professional encounter recruitment and data collection procedures
Time Frame: 6-month implementation period
|
Feasibility of observed client-healthcare professional encounter recruitment is defined as obtaining n ≥ 20 eligible observed encounters during the pilot implementation period.
The investigators will calculate the frequency and proportion of clients and healthcare providers who participate in an observed encounter.
|
6-month implementation period
|
|
Feasibility of ascertainment of retention in methadone treatment during a 6-month period using site Electronic Health Record (EHR) data
Time Frame: 6-month period preceding the implementation period
|
Feasibility is defined as successful estimation of retention in methadone treatment as defined as [1 - Pr(discontinuation of methadone)] during a 6-month period as measured by EHR data.
The investigators are assessing feasibility of obtaining this data and estimating retention from it and therefore the period from which data is obtained is irrelevant.
The probability of retention in treatment during the 6-month implementation period will be calculated as the complement of the probability of discontinuation [1 - Pr(discontinuation)], as measured via EHR data of dates of new episodes of methadone treatment (>7 days between doses).
Using a survival analytic approach accounting for recurrent events, the investigators will calculate the hazard rate for the pilot period and plot the hazard of discontinuation for visual assessment.
|
6-month period preceding the implementation period
|
|
Feasibility and acceptability of the IF intervention for OTPs.
Time Frame: 6-month implementation period
|
Feasibility and acceptability of the IF intervention will be assessed qualitatively by recruiting 25 clients and 10 healthcare professionals for semi-structured interviews and documentation of IF activities via the IF activities log.
Qualitative and IF tracking log results will be presented to the study advisory board for final determination of feasibility and acceptability (Yes/No).
|
6-month implementation period
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of healthcare professional survey recruitment and data collection procedures
Time Frame: 6-month implementation period
|
Feasibility is defined as (a) recruiting n ≥ 8 healthcare professionals who (b) complete the healthcare professional survey during the pilot implementation period.
The investigators will calculate the frequency and proportion of healthcare professionals (a) recruited (start the survey) and (b) who complete the survey.
|
6-month implementation period
|
|
Acceptability of the Spanish version of client survey
Time Frame: 6-month implementation period
|
a) The proportion of clients who opt to take and complete the Spanish version of the survey versus the proportion of clients who opt to take and complete the English version.
|
6-month implementation period
|
|
Utilization of Spanish version of client survey
Time Frame: 6-month implementation period
|
The number of completed Spanish surveys divided by the total number of client surveys completed.
|
6-month implementation period
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Paul Joudrey, MD, MPH, University of Pittsburgh
- Principal Investigator: Cristina Murray-Krezan, PhD, University of Pittsburgh
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 30, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 6, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
August 11, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 11, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 6, 2026
Last Verified
August 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY26030108
- 1R61DA063659 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.