Impact of an Emergency Advanced Practice Nurse on Complications After Home Discharge of Oxygen-Dependent Patients Managed in the Emergency Department: A Quantitative and Qualitative Study (OXYURG-IPA)

August 19, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Strasbourg, France

Impact of the Advanced Practice Nurse (Emergency Care Specialty) on Complications Related to the Home Discharge of Patients on Oxygen Therapy After Management in the Emergency Department: A Quantitative and Qualitative Study

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, discharging patients home on low-flow oxygen therapy has proven to be a safe and effective alternative to hospitalization, helping to relieve overcrowded hospitals while ensuring continuity of care. At the investigating emergency department, a dedicated care pathway ("Oxy-Urg") already allows selected oxygen-dependent patients to return home with a home-care provider, regardless of the cause of their breathlessness, once their condition is stable.

This study evaluates whether managing these patients with a team combining an emergency advanced practice nurse (APN) and an emergency physician, rather than a physician alone, improves the organization of care and reduces complications after home discharge.

Adult oxygen-dependent patients eligible for the Oxy-Urg pathway are randomly assigned (1:1) to management by an APN-physician team (intervention group) or by a physician alone (control group). Both groups then receive the usual Oxy-Urg pathway (home oxygen therapy, provider tele-monitoring, community nurse and general practitioner follow-up).

The main goal is to compare the number of organizational adverse events occurring between inclusion and Day 28 between the two groups. The study also assesses clinical deterioration after discharge, the time professionals spend setting up the pathway, and, through interviews and a focus group, the experience of patients and professionals. The hypothesis is that the APN-physician team allows a more efficient organization and improves the patient experience, supporting the sustainability and wider use of this pathway.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

170

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient (>= 18 years)
  • Affiliated to a social health insurance scheme
  • Able to understand the objectives and risks of the research and to give dated, signed informed consent
  • Oxygen-dependent patient eligible for the Oxy-Urg pathway, meeting all of the following:

    • Stable for more than 12 hours on oxygen therapy in the emergency department
    • Oxygen requirement <= 2 L/min (no upward change for 12 hours)
    • Not socially isolated (relatives able to readily help the patient, living geographically close)
    • Residing within the provider's geographical area (Bas-Rhin department)
    • No known pregnancy at inclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical condition requiring hospitalization (decided by the senior physician, per standard of care)
  • Patient's refusal to enter the pathway
  • Patient managed outside the emergency APN's working hours
  • End-of-life patient
  • Unable to give informed consent (including insufficient understanding of French)
  • Subject in an exclusion period
  • Subject under legal protection
  • Subject under guardianship or curatorship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Advanced practice nurse-physician team
Organizational intervention: the emergency advanced practice nurse and the emergency physician jointly manage the inclusion of the patient in the Oxy-Urg pathway and the organization of the home discharge on oxygen.
Active Comparator: Emergency physician alone (usual care)
Usual care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients with at least one organizational adverse event related to home discharge on oxygen
Time Frame: From inclusion (Day 0) to Day 28
At least one of the following organizational adverse events: (1) total pathway inclusion time greater than 20 minutes; (2) administrative error or omission regarding prescriptions, the liaison file or handover; (3) time to home oxygen availability exceeding the protocol target; (4) initial technical difficulty of the equipment requiring corrective action by the provider; (5) non-compliance with instructions given to home caregivers, evidenced by a documented non-conformity; (6) nurse visit not compliant with the prescription, observed and recorded.
From inclusion (Day 0) to Day 28

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 19, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe