- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07789418
Thread-Embedding Acupuncture Versus Electroacupuncture for Mild-to-Moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
August 24, 2026 updated by: Bui Pham Minh Man, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
Thread-Embedding Acupuncture Versus Electroacupuncture for Mild-to-Moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: An Assessor-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
This study compared thread-embedding acupuncture with electroacupuncture for adults with mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome confirmed by electrodiagnosis.
Eighty participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either thread-embedding acupuncture or electroacupuncture.
Both groups also received standard care, including lifestyle modification, nocturnal wrist splinting, nerve and tendon gliding exercises, and paracetamol as needed.
Thread-embedding acupuncture was administered twice over two weeks, whereas electroacupuncture was administered 10 times over the same period.
Participants were assessed at baseline, week 2, and week 4.
The primary outcome was the change in paresthesia intensity from baseline to week 4, measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale.
Secondary outcomes included pain intensity, symptom severity, functional status, paracetamol use, and adverse events.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
80
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 70000
- University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City - Campus 3
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years or older.
- Primary diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome with pain and paresthesia, confirmed by electrodiagnosis and classified as mild or moderate severity.
- Unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome involving either the right or left hand.
- Voluntary written informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Structural wrist damage due to previous surgery or trauma.
- History of carpal tunnel syndrome surgery.
- Carpal tunnel syndrome with an indication for surgical treatment.
- Concomitant cervical radiculopathy, brachial plexopathy, proximal median neuropathy, other upper-limb neuropathies, or polyneuropathy confirmed by electrodiagnosis.
- Systemic inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, gout, ankylosing spondylitis, or psoriatic arthritis.
- Hypothyroidism.
- Unstable or untreated severe health conditions, including end-stage renal failure, severe hepatic failure, or NYHA class IV heart failure.
- Use of anti-inflammatory medications within two weeks before enrollment.
- Alcohol or substance abuse.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
- History of allergy, anaphylaxis, or contraindications to thread-embedding acupuncture or electroacupuncture, including emergency conditions, cachexia, local skin infections or dermatological diseases at acupoint sites, or allergy to absorbable sutures.
- Current treatment with anticoagulant drugs or diagnosed coagulation disorders.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Thread-Embedding Acupuncture
Participants received thread-embedding acupuncture twice over two weeks, at baseline and week 1, in addition to standard care.
|
Thread-embedding acupuncture was administered twice over two weeks, at baseline and week 1.
Sterile polydioxanone thread-embedding needles were inserted at PC4, PC6, PC7, PC8, LI4, LI5, LU10, LU6, HT7, and TE5.
The device consisted of a sterile 31-G stainless-steel cannula with a 30-mm needle shaft and a 30-mm polydioxanone thread folded in half, corresponding to an embedded thread length of approximately 15 mm.
The thread was placed within the muscle layer and left in situ after withdrawal of the needle.
Both treatment groups received standard care throughout the four-week study period, including lifestyle modification to avoid wrist flexion and strain, nocturnal wrist splinting, daily nerve and tendon gliding exercises, and paracetamol 500 mg as needed for intolerable pain with a minimum four-hour interval between doses.
|
|
Active Comparator: Electroacupuncture
Participants received electroacupuncture once daily, five times per week for two weeks, for a total of 10 sessions, in addition to standard care.
|
Both treatment groups received standard care throughout the four-week study period, including lifestyle modification to avoid wrist flexion and strain, nocturnal wrist splinting, daily nerve and tendon gliding exercises, and paracetamol 500 mg as needed for intolerable pain with a minimum four-hour interval between doses.
Electroacupuncture was administered once daily, five times per week for two weeks, for a total of 10 sessions.
Sterile disposable needles were inserted at PC4, PC6, PC7, PC8, LI4, LI5, LU10, LU6, HT7, and TE5.
Continuous biphasic rectangular pulses with alternating frequencies of 2/100 Hz every 3 seconds and a pulse width of 0.2 ms were delivered for 20 minutes.
Stimulation intensity was adjusted within 2-5 mA according to participant tolerance.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Paresthesia Visual Analog Scale Score at Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 4
|
Paresthesia intensity was measured using a self-reported 100-mm visual analog scale ranging from 0 mm, representing no symptom, to 100 mm, representing the worst imaginable symptom.
The outcome was the change in paresthesia-VAS score from baseline to week 4.
|
Baseline to Week 4
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Paresthesia Visual Analog Scale Score at Week 2
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 2
|
Paresthesia intensity was measured using a self-reported 100-mm visual analog scale ranging from 0 mm, representing no symptom, to 100 mm, representing the worst imaginable symptom.
The outcome was the change in paresthesia-VAS score from baseline to week 2.
|
Baseline to Week 2
|
|
Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale Score
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 2 and Week 4
|
Pain intensity was measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale ranging from 0 mm, representing no pain, to 100 mm, representing the worst imaginable pain.
The outcome was the change in pain-VAS score from baseline.
|
Baseline to Week 2 and Week 4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Scores
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 2 and Week 4
|
The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire consists of the Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) and Functional Status Scale (FSS).
The SSS includes 11 items scored from 1 to 5, with a total score ranging from 11 to 55.
The FSS includes 8 items scored from 1 to 5, with a total score ranging from 8 to 40.
The overall BCTQ score was calculated as the sum of the SSS and FSS scores, ranging from 19 to 95.
Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity and functional impairment.
|
Baseline to Week 2 and Week 4
|
|
Weekly Paracetamol Consumption
Time Frame: Weekly during the 4-week study period
|
Rescue paracetamol use was recorded as the number of 500-mg tablets consumed per week.
|
Weekly during the 4-week study period
|
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame: From baseline through Week 4
|
Adverse events occurring during the study were monitored and recorded, including events such as ecchymosis and localized pain associated with the acupuncture procedures.
|
From baseline through Week 4
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Minh-Man P Bui, PhD, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 21, 2024
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 26, 2025
Study Completion (Actual)
May 26, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 24, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 24, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
August 27, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 27, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 24, 2026
Last Verified
August 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Nervous System Diseases
- Wounds and Injuries
- Neuromuscular Diseases
- Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
- Median Neuropathy
- Mononeuropathies
- Nerve Compression Syndromes
- Cumulative Trauma Disorders
- Sprains and Strains
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
- Health Services Administration
- Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation
- Therapeutics
- Quality of Health Care
- Complementary Therapies
- Physical Therapy Modalities
- Quality Indicators, Health Care
- Rehabilitation
- Anesthesia and Analgesia
- Electric Stimulation Therapy
- Combined Modality Therapy
- Anesthesia
- Analgesia
- Acupuncture Therapy
- Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
- Standard of Care
- Electroacupuncture
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2583/DHYD-HDDD
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the published article will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Beginning after publication of the study results, with no predetermined end date.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
De-identified individual participant data will be available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Requests should include the purpose of the proposed analysis and will be considered by the study investigators, subject to applicable ethical and institutional requirements.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.