Study Evaluating the Predictive Value of the Terminal Latency Index (TLI) for Treatment Response in Patients With Anti-MAG Neuropathy (PREDIMAG)

August 26, 2026 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

A Monocentric Retrospective Study Evaluating the Predictive Value of the Terminal Latency Index (TLI) for Treatment Response in Patients With Anti-MAG Neuropathy

"Anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (anti-MAG) neuropathy is a rare dysimmune peripheral neuropathy, most commonly associated with an IgM monoclonal gammopathy. Its course is generally slow but may lead to significant functional disability. Despite therapeutic advances, including rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg), immunochemotherapy, and more recently Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), treatment response remains highly variable between patients. The Terminal Latency Index (TLI), an electrophysiological parameter reflecting distal demyelination, is a recognized diagnostic marker of anti-MAG neuropathy. However, its potential role as a predictive biomarker of treatment response remains insufficiently studied. Identifying a simple, reproducible, and readily available biomarker that could predict treatment response would be of major clinical importance for personalized patient management and optimization of therapeutic strategies. This monocentric retrospective study will analyze clinical, biological, and electrophysiological data from patients with anti-MAG neuropathy followed at Nice University Hospital (CHU de Nice) to assess the predictive value of baseline TLI for clinical response 12 months after treatment initiation."

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Alpes Maritimes
      • Nice, Alpes Maritimes, France, 06000

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

"Adult patients with documented anti-MAG activity-associated neuropathy, followed at the Reference Center for Rare Diseases of the Peripheral Nervous System at Nice University Hospital (CHU de Nice) between January 2005 and July 2025. Planned number of participants: 100 patients."

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented anti-MAG IgM polyneuropathy: positive anti-MAG antibodies, associated with an IgM monoclonal gammopathy, and a compatible clinical phenotype.
  • Complete and interpretable baseline ENMG assessment: an initial electroneuromyography (ENMG) examination allowing reliable calculation of the TLI in at least two motor nerves among the right median, ulnar, and common fibular nerves.
  • The examination must include the distal motor latency, proximal motor conduction velocity, and compound muscle action potential (CMAP).
  • Treatment with at least one established therapeutic strategy: treatment initiated at the center, including intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg), rituximab, immunochemotherapy, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), and/or symptomatic treatment.
  • Available functional clinical assessment: a documented INCAT disability score at two predefined time points: baseline (before treatment initiation) and 12 months (±2 months) after treatment initiation.
  • Consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Peripheral neuropathy associated with an IgM monoclonal gammopathy, with strictly negative anti-MAG antibody testing or no available anti-MAG antibody measurement.
  • Incomplete or uninterpretable ENMG data preventing accurate calculation of the TLI for the nerves of interest (median and ulnar nerves).
  • Absence of a formally documented INCAT score at baseline or within the 12-month assessment window.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (anti-MAG) neuropathy
This monocentric retrospective observational study will include 100 patients with anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (anti-MAG) neuropathy followed at Nice University Hospital (CHU de Nice). No additional intervention or modification of routine clinical care will be performed. Clinical, biological, therapeutic, and electrophysiological data will be retrospectively collected from medical records and available archives. Routinely performed electroneuromyography (ENMG) data will be analyzed, with particular emphasis on the Terminal Latency Index (TLI), calculated from available electrophysiological parameters according to the standard formula. The predictive value of baseline TLI for clinical response to treatment at 12 months will be assessed. Treatments received as part of routine care, including rituximab, IVIg, immunochemotherapy, and Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), will be recorded. No treatment will be assigned or modified by the study. Data will be pseudonymized and ent
This monocentric retrospective observational study will include 100 patients with anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (anti-MAG) neuropathy followed at Nice University Hospital (CHU de Nice). No additional intervention or modification of routine clinical care will be performed. Clinical, biological, therapeutic, and electrophysiological data will be retrospectively collected from medical records and available archives. Routinely performed electroneuromyography (ENMG) data will be analyzed, with particular emphasis on the Terminal Latency Index (TLI), calculated from available electrophysiological parameters according to the standard formula. The predictive value of baseline TLI for clinical response to treatment at 12 months will be assessed. Treatments received as part of routine care, including rituximab, IVIg, immunochemotherapy, and Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), will be recorded. No treatment will be assigned or modified by the study. Data will be pseudonymized and ente

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Favorable Clinical Response at 12 Months (≥1-Point Decrease in INCAT Score)
Time Frame: 12 months after treatment initiation
Clinical response at 12 months, defined as a reduction of at least 1 point in the INCAT disability score from baseline. This outcome will be used to assess the predictive value of the baseline Terminal Latency Index (TLI) for treatment response in patients with anti-MAG neuropathy.
12 months after treatment initiation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Predictive performance of TLI according to treatment strategy
Time Frame: 12 months after treatment initiation.
Assessment of the predictive performance of baseline TLI for clinical response at 12 months, stratified according to the treatment strategy received.
12 months after treatment initiation.
Correlation between TLI, anti-MAG antibody titer, and INCAT score evolution
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months after treatment initiation
Assessment of the association between baseline TLI, quantitative anti-MAG antibody titer, and change in the INCAT disability score from baseline to 12 months.
Baseline to 12 months after treatment initiation
Optimal TLI threshold for predicting treatment response
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months after treatment initiation
Determination of the optimal baseline TLI threshold for predicting clinical response at 12 months using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the Youden index
Baseline to 12 months after treatment initiation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mecheli Cavalli

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe