- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07810790
Upper Extremity Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: A Study Evaluating Safety, Functional Outcomes, and Patient-Reported Psychosocial Outcomes
September 3, 2026 updated by: Yale University
Upper Extremity Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: A Prospective Interventional Study Evaluating Safety, Functional Outcomes, and Patient-Reported Psychosocial Outcomes
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the 5-year (60-month) allograft survival rate of upper extremity vascularized composite allotransplantation performed under the standardized CONSORT clinical protocol.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study population includes adults with severe upper extremity disfigurement meeting the following criteria:
- Anatomic Severity: Loss of upper extremity proximal to the wrist (including transhumeral and shoulder-level levels when clinically appropriate)
- Refractory Status: prosthesis delivered unsatisfactory results
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
5
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Omowunmi Afolabi, MSc. Psychology
- Phone Number: 203-737-4752
- Email: omowunmi.afolabi@yale.edu
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
-
-
Connecticut
-
New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06519
- Yale New Haven Hospital / Yale University
-
-
Kentucky
-
Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40292
- University of Louisville
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205
- Johns Hopkins Medicine
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55902
- Mayo Clinic
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10016
- NYU Langone Health
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
- Cleveland Clinic
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
- University of Pennsylvania
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Participants:
- Competent to provide informed consent, as determined through structured clinical assessment by qualified study personnel, and able to demonstrate adequate psychosocial support, including caregiver or other support-person assistance as needed, to facilitate postoperative recovery, adherence to immunosuppressive therapy, and long-term study follow-up.
where feasible, to support psychosocial and aesthetic integration.
- Willingness to undergo comprehensive psychosocial evaluation and ongoing monitoring by the multidisciplinary team.
- Demonstrated motivation for transplantation and understanding of the investigational nature of upper extremity VCA, including its risks, potential benefits, alternatives, and long-term commitments.
- Evidence of psychological stability and adaptive coping, with attention to prior trauma, grief, and body-image disturbances; stable treatment for conditions such as depression, anxiety, or post-traumatic stress disorder is acceptable when documented and appropriately managed.
- Demonstrated capacity for adherence and, when available, a history of adherence to complex medical regimens, such as chronic disease treatment, dialysis, or transplant care, recognizing that prior barriers may be mitigated through structured supports and longitudinal follow-up.
- Availability of adequate family, caregiver, and/or social support, including an identified caregiver, support person, or formal support services, sufficient to assist with postoperative recovery, medication adherence, transportation, and psychosocial needs. A caregiver/family information sheet will be provided to support persons to promote realistic expectations prior to consent.
- Final psychosocial approval by a transplant mental health professional in consultation with the broader psychosocial team.
- Severe upper extremity disfigurement involving amputation proximal to the wrist.
- Conventional restorative options, including advanced myoelectric or body-powered prostheses, must be documented as exhausted (defined as a minimum of 12 months of consistent use of myoelectric or body-powered prostheses with a QuickDASH score remaining above 30), infeasible (due to stump length or soft tissue coverage), or clinically inadequate for restoring the sensory-motor integration required for the participant's essential functional needs.
- Identified plan for access to immunosuppressive medications and required follow up care (e.g., insurance coverage, assistance programs, institutional support), coordinated with social work and financial counseling.
- Willingness and ability, with available supports, to attend required follow up visits (in person or via approved telehealth where appropriate).
Donor:
- Legal declaration of brain death
- Documented consent for VCA donation.
- ABO and HLA compatibility with the intended recipient.
- Negative crossmatch with the intended recipient (unless protocol specified exceptions are approved by immunology and the IRB).
- EBV and CMV serostatus known (CMV mismatch (donor-positive/recipient-negative (D+/R-) is not automatically exclusionary but managed by the multidisciplinary study team).
- Upper extremity anatomy suitable for transplant (no significant upper extremity trauma, major congenital anomalies, or prior upper extremity surgery that would preclude safe procurement or acceptable aesthetic/functional outcomes).
- Reasonably matched skin tone and sex, where feasible, to support psychosocial and aesthetic integration.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Anatomical or surgical factors that render transplantation unsafe or technically unfeasible (e.g., prohibitive vascular disease, prior surgeries precluding adequate anastomoses) in the judgment of the surgical team.
- Positive Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) serology (unless future evidence and institutional policy support inclusion under tightly controlled conditions).
- Active or inadequately treated serious infection, including tuberculosis, hepatitis B or C with uncontrolled viremia, or syphilis.
- Active malignancy.
- History of melanoma or other high risk, virus driven malignancies.
- Malignancy in remission <5 years, except for selected low risk, non viral cancers explicitly reviewed and approved by the transplant team.
- Must have clearance for transplant from oncology.
- Decompensated liver disease without hepatology clearance
- Decompensated or advanced cirrhosis
- Uncontrolled or uncorrectable comorbidities that substantially elevate perioperative or immunosuppressive risk despite optimization efforts (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes with end organ damage, uncontrolled hypertension, uncorrected coagulopathy).
- Current pregnancy or stated intent to become pregnant within 12 months of transplant.
- Inability or unwillingness to use effective contraception, when applicable.
- Documented pattern of poor adherence or inability to engage with follow up despite reasonable, trauma informed efforts to reduce barriers (e.g., transportation, scheduling, health literacy, financial support).
- Active psychiatric illness that currently impairs judgment, decisional capacity, or capacity to adhere to care (e.g., untreated psychosis, severe untreated depression with suicidality, impaired reality testing), as determined by the transplant psychosocial team.
- Smoking at the time of transplantation (including cigarettes, vaping, or nicotine products)
- Active substance use disorder (alcohol or drugs) without sustained remission and without adequate recovery supports, unless the multidisciplinary team determines that risk has been sufficiently mitigated.
- Persistent, unrealistic expectations about transplant outcomes that do not resolve despite structured education and counseling.
- Absence of any viable psychosocial or financial support pathway after reasonable efforts to develop one (e.g., no caregiver and no alternative formal support options, or no feasible mechanism to obtain essential medications).
- Inability to provide informed consent, even with appropriate accommodations (e.g., language services, plain language materials, decision aids), and no appropriate legally authorized representative where required.
- Any other condition or circumstance judged by the multidisciplinary transplant team and IRB to pose unacceptable risk or compromise ethical conduct of the study.
Donor:
- Positive serology for HIV, HBV, HCV, TB, or syphilis, or other identified transmissible infections per current OPTN/UNOS and PHS guidance. HTLV testing will be conducted in line with current OPTN standards for donors with potential transmissible infections that are treatable in the recipient.
- Known history of cancer, especially head/neck or hematologic malignancy.
- Permanent upper extremity tattoos or highly identifiable markings judged incompatible with the recipient's preferences or the clinical/ethical judgment of the transplant team.
- History of extremity radiation that compromises tissue viability.
- Public Health Service (PHS) increased risk donors (e.g., recent IV drug use, incarceration) will not be automatically excluded but will require case by case risk assessment, full disclosure to the recipient, and documented multidisciplinary approval.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Upper Extremity Composite Allotransplantation
Upper Extremity VCA performed under a standardized CONSORT clinical protocol.
The study utilizes a longitudinal cohort design where each participant serves as their own control pre and post transplant.
|
Upper Extremity VCA, performed to treat severe facial defects.
This procedure will be performed by qualified surgeons in accordance with standard institutional surgical practices.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of participants with Allograft Survival at 60 months
Time Frame: Day 0 (surgery), weekly during initial hospitalization, months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and annually thereafter through Month 60
|
Allograft survival is defined as the continued presence of the transplanted upper extremity tissue with evidence of adequate vascular perfusion assessed as clinical evaluation by the surgical team.
Survival is a binary categorical variable (Success/Failure).
Failure is defined as total graft loss necessitating surgical removal (explantation).
|
Day 0 (surgery), weekly during initial hospitalization, months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and annually thereafter through Month 60
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Active Range of Motion
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
Measured in degrees for the transplanted joint (the elbow (in some occasions), the wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), and distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints).
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Muscle strength assessed using Clinical Motor Grading (MRC Scale)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale is a standardized 0-to-5 manual muscle testing system used by clinicians to grade muscle strength and motor power.
Motor strength was graded on a scale from M0 to M5, where M0 indicates no visible muscle contraction and M5 indicates normal muscle strength against full resistance
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Mean Grip and Pinch Strength
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
Quantified in kilograms (kg) or pounds (lbs) using a calibrated Jamar dynamometer for power grip and a pinch gauge for tip-to-tip and key pinch.
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Carroll Upper Extremity Function Test (UEFT)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
A validated composite score of 33 tasks used to measure overall functional capability.
Uses a 0 to 3 scale for individual task performance:0 points: Cannot complete any portion.1 point: Completes part of the test item.2
points: Completes the item slowly or clumsily.3
points: Completes the item fully and normally.Yields a cumulative score up to 99 for the dominant hand and 96 for the non-dominant hand
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
Measured in seconds to quantify manual dexterity and fine motor coordination.
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Sensory Detection Thresholds assessed using Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
Evaluates light touch thresholds and protective sensation loss in hands, feet, or limbs.
Determined by the minimum size of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament perceived by the patient.
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Tactile Acuity (2PD)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
Measured by Static Two-Point Discrimination in millimeters (mm).
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Mean score General Health Status (PROMIS-29 v2.0)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
29-item questionnaire that measures general physical, mental, and social health-related quality of life.
Results are converted into T-scores where 50 is the average for the U.S. general population, with a standard deviation of 10.
Higher score means worse symptoms or better ability.
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Mean score Health Utility (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized participant completed questionnaire that measures health-related quality of life.
It consists of consists of 5 dimensions each scored: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4= severe problems, and 5= extreme problems.
Higher scores indicated greater levels of problems across each of the five dimensions.
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Mean score LIMB-QOL Resilience, Self Care and Fine Motor
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
Evaluates resilience, self care and fine motor following major extremity injury.
Higher scores reflect a more positive outcome.
Scored on a T-score metric with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Mean score Upper Extremity Disability (QuickDASH)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
An 11-item self-reported tool measuring upper extremity physical function and symptoms.
Scores range from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Number of participants with Opportunistic infections
Time Frame: Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
|
Number of participants with Opportunistic infections
|
Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
|
|
Number of participants with Malignancies
Time Frame: Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
|
Number of participants with Malignancies
|
Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
|
|
Number of participants with Organ toxicity
Time Frame: Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
|
Number of participants with Organ toxicity
|
Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
|
|
Number of participants that complete all assessments
Time Frame: Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
|
Number of participants that complete all assessments
|
Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
|
|
Number of participants that complete the Central Review Agreement
Time Frame: Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
|
Number of participants that complete the Central Review Agreement
|
Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
|
|
Acute Rejection Incidence and Severity
Time Frame: Weekly for the first month, monthly for the first year, quarterly until end of study (month 60)
|
The total number of Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) episodes per patient and their severity as graded by the Banff VCA classification.
|
Weekly for the first month, monthly for the first year, quarterly until end of study (month 60)
|
|
Mean days to Reversibility of Acute Rejection
Time Frame: Weekly for the first month, monthly for the first year, quarterly until end of study (month 60)
|
Measured by the Time to Clinical Resolution, defined as the number of days from the initiation of anti-rejection therapy to the return of the allograft to baseline clinical appearance and/or a follow-up biopsy showing a lower Banff grade or resolution.
|
Weekly for the first month, monthly for the first year, quarterly until end of study (month 60)
|
|
Number of participants with Chronic Allograft Rejection (CLAD/CAV):
Time Frame: Weekly for the first month, monthly for the first year, quarterly until end of study (month 60)
|
Number of participants with Chronic Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV) or chronic skin changes as identified via protocol-driven histopathology.
|
Weekly for the first month, monthly for the first year, quarterly until end of study (month 60)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Bohdan Pomahac, MD, Yale University
- Principal Investigator: Vijay Gorantla, MD, PhD, FRCS, Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
October 1, 2027
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2037
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2037
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 3, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 3, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
September 9, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 9, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 3, 2026
Last Verified
September 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2000042327
- HT9425-23-3-0001 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Department of the Army)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.