Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Upper Extremity Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: A Study Evaluating Safety, Functional Outcomes, and Patient-Reported Psychosocial Outcomes

11 de setembro de 2026 atualizado por: Yale University

Upper Extremity Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: A Prospective Interventional Study Evaluating Safety, Functional Outcomes, and Patient-Reported Psychosocial Outcomes

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the 5-year (60-month) allograft survival rate of upper extremity vascularized composite allotransplantation performed under the standardized CONSORT clinical protocol.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

The study population includes adults with severe upper extremity disfigurement meeting the following criteria:

  • Anatomic Severity: Loss of upper extremity proximal to the wrist (including transhumeral and shoulder-level levels when clinically appropriate)
  • Refractory Status: prosthesis delivered unsatisfactory results

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

5

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Locais de estudo

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, Estados Unidos, 90048
        • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, Estados Unidos, 06519
        • Yale New Haven Hospital / Yale University
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, Estados Unidos, 40292
        • University of Louisville
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, Estados Unidos, 21205
        • Johns Hopkins Medicine
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, Estados Unidos, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, Estados Unidos, 55902
        • Mayo Clinic
    • New York
      • New York, New York, Estados Unidos, 10016
        • NYU Langone Health
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, Estados Unidos, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Estados Unidos, 19104
        • University of Pennsylvania

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

Participants:

  • Competent to provide informed consent, as determined through structured clinical assessment by qualified study personnel, and able to demonstrate adequate psychosocial support, including caregiver or other support-person assistance as needed, to facilitate postoperative recovery, adherence to immunosuppressive therapy, and long-term study follow-up.

where feasible, to support psychosocial and aesthetic integration.

  • Willingness to undergo comprehensive psychosocial evaluation and ongoing monitoring by the multidisciplinary team.
  • Demonstrated motivation for transplantation and understanding of the investigational nature of upper extremity VCA, including its risks, potential benefits, alternatives, and long-term commitments.
  • Evidence of psychological stability and adaptive coping, with attention to prior trauma, grief, and body-image disturbances; stable treatment for conditions such as depression, anxiety, or post-traumatic stress disorder is acceptable when documented and appropriately managed.
  • Demonstrated capacity for adherence and, when available, a history of adherence to complex medical regimens, such as chronic disease treatment, dialysis, or transplant care, recognizing that prior barriers may be mitigated through structured supports and longitudinal follow-up.
  • Availability of adequate family, caregiver, and/or social support, including an identified caregiver, support person, or formal support services, sufficient to assist with postoperative recovery, medication adherence, transportation, and psychosocial needs. A caregiver/family information sheet will be provided to support persons to promote realistic expectations prior to consent.
  • Final psychosocial approval by a transplant mental health professional in consultation with the broader psychosocial team.
  • Severe upper extremity disfigurement involving amputation proximal to the wrist.
  • Conventional restorative options, including advanced myoelectric or body-powered prostheses, must be documented as exhausted (defined as a minimum of 12 months of consistent use of myoelectric or body-powered prostheses with a QuickDASH score remaining above 30), infeasible (due to stump length or soft tissue coverage), or clinically inadequate for restoring the sensory-motor integration required for the participant's essential functional needs.
  • Identified plan for access to immunosuppressive medications and required follow up care (e.g., insurance coverage, assistance programs, institutional support), coordinated with social work and financial counseling.
  • Willingness and ability, with available supports, to attend required follow up visits (in person or via approved telehealth where appropriate).

Donor:

  • Legal declaration of brain death
  • Documented consent for VCA donation.
  • ABO and HLA compatibility with the intended recipient.
  • Negative crossmatch with the intended recipient (unless protocol specified exceptions are approved by immunology and the IRB).
  • EBV and CMV serostatus known (CMV mismatch (donor-positive/recipient-negative (D+/R-) is not automatically exclusionary but managed by the multidisciplinary study team).
  • Upper extremity anatomy suitable for transplant (no significant upper extremity trauma, major congenital anomalies, or prior upper extremity surgery that would preclude safe procurement or acceptable aesthetic/functional outcomes).
  • Reasonably matched skin tone and sex, where feasible, to support psychosocial and aesthetic integration.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anatomical or surgical factors that render transplantation unsafe or technically unfeasible (e.g., prohibitive vascular disease, prior surgeries precluding adequate anastomoses) in the judgment of the surgical team.
  • Positive Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) serology (unless future evidence and institutional policy support inclusion under tightly controlled conditions).
  • Active or inadequately treated serious infection, including tuberculosis, hepatitis B or C with uncontrolled viremia, or syphilis.
  • Active malignancy.
  • History of melanoma or other high risk, virus driven malignancies.
  • Malignancy in remission <5 years, except for selected low risk, non viral cancers explicitly reviewed and approved by the transplant team.
  • Must have clearance for transplant from oncology.
  • Decompensated liver disease without hepatology clearance
  • Decompensated or advanced cirrhosis
  • Uncontrolled or uncorrectable comorbidities that substantially elevate perioperative or immunosuppressive risk despite optimization efforts (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes with end organ damage, uncontrolled hypertension, uncorrected coagulopathy).
  • Current pregnancy or stated intent to become pregnant within 12 months of transplant.
  • Inability or unwillingness to use effective contraception, when applicable.
  • Documented pattern of poor adherence or inability to engage with follow up despite reasonable, trauma informed efforts to reduce barriers (e.g., transportation, scheduling, health literacy, financial support).
  • Active psychiatric illness that currently impairs judgment, decisional capacity, or capacity to adhere to care (e.g., untreated psychosis, severe untreated depression with suicidality, impaired reality testing), as determined by the transplant psychosocial team.
  • Smoking at the time of transplantation (including cigarettes, vaping, or nicotine products)
  • Active substance use disorder (alcohol or drugs) without sustained remission and without adequate recovery supports, unless the multidisciplinary team determines that risk has been sufficiently mitigated.
  • Persistent, unrealistic expectations about transplant outcomes that do not resolve despite structured education and counseling.
  • Absence of any viable psychosocial or financial support pathway after reasonable efforts to develop one (e.g., no caregiver and no alternative formal support options, or no feasible mechanism to obtain essential medications).
  • Inability to provide informed consent, even with appropriate accommodations (e.g., language services, plain language materials, decision aids), and no appropriate legally authorized representative where required.
  • Any other condition or circumstance judged by the multidisciplinary transplant team and IRB to pose unacceptable risk or compromise ethical conduct of the study.

Donor:

  • Positive serology for HIV, HBV, HCV, TB, or syphilis, or other identified transmissible infections per current OPTN/UNOS and PHS guidance. HTLV testing will be conducted in line with current OPTN standards for donors with potential transmissible infections that are treatable in the recipient.
  • Known history of cancer, especially head/neck or hematologic malignancy.
  • Permanent upper extremity tattoos or highly identifiable markings judged incompatible with the recipient's preferences or the clinical/ethical judgment of the transplant team.
  • History of extremity radiation that compromises tissue viability.
  • Public Health Service (PHS) increased risk donors (e.g., recent IV drug use, incarceration) will not be automatically excluded but will require case by case risk assessment, full disclosure to the recipient, and documented multidisciplinary approval.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: N / D
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição de grupo único
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Upper Extremity Composite Allotransplantation
Upper Extremity VCA performed under a standardized CONSORT clinical protocol. The study utilizes a longitudinal cohort design where each participant serves as their own control pre and post transplant.
Upper Extremity VCA, performed to treat severe facial defects. This procedure will be performed by qualified surgeons in accordance with standard institutional surgical practices.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Number of participants with Allograft Survival at 60 months
Prazo: Day 0 (surgery), weekly during initial hospitalization, months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and annually thereafter through Month 60
Allograft survival is defined as the continued presence of the transplanted upper extremity tissue with evidence of adequate vascular perfusion assessed as clinical evaluation by the surgical team. Survival is a binary categorical variable (Success/Failure). Failure is defined as total graft loss necessitating surgical removal (explantation).
Day 0 (surgery), weekly during initial hospitalization, months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and annually thereafter through Month 60

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Mean Active Range of Motion
Prazo: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Measured in degrees for the transplanted joint (the elbow (in some occasions), the wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), and distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints).
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Muscle strength assessed using Clinical Motor Grading (MRC Scale)
Prazo: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale is a standardized 0-to-5 manual muscle testing system used by clinicians to grade muscle strength and motor power. Motor strength was graded on a scale from M0 to M5, where M0 indicates no visible muscle contraction and M5 indicates normal muscle strength against full resistance
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Carroll Upper Extremity Function Test (UEFT)
Prazo: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
A validated composite score of 33 tasks used to measure overall functional capability. Uses a 0 to 3 scale for individual task performance:0 points: Cannot complete any portion.1 point: Completes part of the test item.2 points: Completes the item slowly or clumsily.3 points: Completes the item fully and normally.Yields a cumulative score up to 99 for the dominant hand and 96 for the non-dominant hand
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT)
Prazo: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Measured in seconds to quantify manual dexterity and fine motor coordination.
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Sensory Detection Thresholds assessed using Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test
Prazo: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Evaluates light touch thresholds and protective sensation loss in hands, feet, or limbs. Determined by the minimum size of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament perceived by the patient.
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Tactile Acuity (2PD)
Prazo: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Measured by Static Two-Point Discrimination in millimeters (mm).
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Mean score General Health Status (PROMIS-29 v2.0)
Prazo: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
29-item questionnaire that measures general physical, mental, and social health-related quality of life. Results are converted into T-scores where 50 is the average for the U.S. general population, with a standard deviation of 10. Higher score means worse symptoms or better ability.
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Mean score Health Utility (EQ-5D-5L)
Prazo: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized participant completed questionnaire that measures health-related quality of life. It consists of consists of 5 dimensions each scored: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4= severe problems, and 5= extreme problems. Higher scores indicated greater levels of problems across each of the five dimensions.
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Mean score LIMB-QOL Resilience, Self Care and Fine Motor
Prazo: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Evaluates resilience, self care and fine motor following major extremity injury. Higher scores reflect a more positive outcome. Scored on a T-score metric with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Mean score Upper Extremity Disability (QuickDASH)
Prazo: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
An 11-item self-reported tool measuring upper extremity physical function and symptoms. Scores range from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Number of participants with Opportunistic infections
Prazo: Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
Number of participants with Opportunistic infections
Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
Number of participants with Malignancies
Prazo: Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
Number of participants with Malignancies
Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
Number of participants with Organ toxicity
Prazo: Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
Number of participants with Organ toxicity
Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
Number of participants that complete all assessments
Prazo: Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
Number of participants that complete all assessments
Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
Number of participants that complete the Central Review Agreement
Prazo: Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
Number of participants that complete the Central Review Agreement
Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
Acute Rejection Incidence and Severity
Prazo: Weekly for the first month, monthly for the first year, quarterly until end of study (month 60)
The total number of Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) episodes per patient and their severity as graded by the Banff VCA classification.
Weekly for the first month, monthly for the first year, quarterly until end of study (month 60)
Mean days to Reversibility of Acute Rejection
Prazo: Weekly for the first month, monthly for the first year, quarterly until end of study (month 60)
Measured by the Time to Clinical Resolution, defined as the number of days from the initiation of anti-rejection therapy to the return of the allograft to baseline clinical appearance and/or a follow-up biopsy showing a lower Banff grade or resolution.
Weekly for the first month, monthly for the first year, quarterly until end of study (month 60)
Number of participants with Chronic Allograft Rejection (CLAD/CAV):
Prazo: Weekly for the first month, monthly for the first year, quarterly until end of study (month 60)
Number of participants with Chronic Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV) or chronic skin changes as identified via protocol-driven histopathology.
Weekly for the first month, monthly for the first year, quarterly until end of study (month 60)
Mean Grip Strength
Prazo: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Quantified in kilograms (kg) using a calibrated hand dynamometer
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Mean Pinch Strength
Prazo: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Quantified in kilograms (kg) using a calibrated pinch gauge
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Bohdan Pomahac, MD, Yale University
  • Investigador principal: Vijay Gorantla, MD, PhD, FRCS, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

1 de outubro de 2027

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

1 de outubro de 2037

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

1 de outubro de 2037

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

3 de setembro de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

3 de setembro de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

9 de setembro de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

15 de setembro de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

11 de setembro de 2026

Última verificação

1 de setembro de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • 2000042327
  • HT9425-23-3-0001 (Número de outro subsídio/financiamento: Department of the Army)

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever