- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT07810790
Upper Extremity Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: A Study Evaluating Safety, Functional Outcomes, and Patient-Reported Psychosocial Outcomes
11 septembre 2026 mis à jour par: Yale University
Upper Extremity Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: A Prospective Interventional Study Evaluating Safety, Functional Outcomes, and Patient-Reported Psychosocial Outcomes
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the 5-year (60-month) allograft survival rate of upper extremity vascularized composite allotransplantation performed under the standardized CONSORT clinical protocol.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Pas encore de recrutement
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
The study population includes adults with severe upper extremity disfigurement meeting the following criteria:
- Anatomic Severity: Loss of upper extremity proximal to the wrist (including transhumeral and shoulder-level levels when clinically appropriate)
- Refractory Status: prosthesis delivered unsatisfactory results
Type d'étude
Interventionnel
Inscription (Estimé)
5
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: Omowunmi Afolabi, MSc. Psychology
- Numéro de téléphone: 203-737-4752
- E-mail: omowunmi.afolabi@yale.edu
Lieux d'étude
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, États-Unis, 90048
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
-
-
Connecticut
-
New Haven, Connecticut, États-Unis, 06519
- Yale New Haven Hospital / Yale University
-
-
Kentucky
-
Louisville, Kentucky, États-Unis, 40292
- University of Louisville
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, États-Unis, 21205
- Johns Hopkins Medicine
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, États-Unis, 02115
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester, Minnesota, États-Unis, 55902
- Mayo Clinic
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, États-Unis, 10016
- NYU Langone Health
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, États-Unis, 44195
- Cleveland Clinic
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, États-Unis, 19104
- University of Pennsylvania
-
-
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
Non
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
Participants:
- Competent to provide informed consent, as determined through structured clinical assessment by qualified study personnel, and able to demonstrate adequate psychosocial support, including caregiver or other support-person assistance as needed, to facilitate postoperative recovery, adherence to immunosuppressive therapy, and long-term study follow-up.
where feasible, to support psychosocial and aesthetic integration.
- Willingness to undergo comprehensive psychosocial evaluation and ongoing monitoring by the multidisciplinary team.
- Demonstrated motivation for transplantation and understanding of the investigational nature of upper extremity VCA, including its risks, potential benefits, alternatives, and long-term commitments.
- Evidence of psychological stability and adaptive coping, with attention to prior trauma, grief, and body-image disturbances; stable treatment for conditions such as depression, anxiety, or post-traumatic stress disorder is acceptable when documented and appropriately managed.
- Demonstrated capacity for adherence and, when available, a history of adherence to complex medical regimens, such as chronic disease treatment, dialysis, or transplant care, recognizing that prior barriers may be mitigated through structured supports and longitudinal follow-up.
- Availability of adequate family, caregiver, and/or social support, including an identified caregiver, support person, or formal support services, sufficient to assist with postoperative recovery, medication adherence, transportation, and psychosocial needs. A caregiver/family information sheet will be provided to support persons to promote realistic expectations prior to consent.
- Final psychosocial approval by a transplant mental health professional in consultation with the broader psychosocial team.
- Severe upper extremity disfigurement involving amputation proximal to the wrist.
- Conventional restorative options, including advanced myoelectric or body-powered prostheses, must be documented as exhausted (defined as a minimum of 12 months of consistent use of myoelectric or body-powered prostheses with a QuickDASH score remaining above 30), infeasible (due to stump length or soft tissue coverage), or clinically inadequate for restoring the sensory-motor integration required for the participant's essential functional needs.
- Identified plan for access to immunosuppressive medications and required follow up care (e.g., insurance coverage, assistance programs, institutional support), coordinated with social work and financial counseling.
- Willingness and ability, with available supports, to attend required follow up visits (in person or via approved telehealth where appropriate).
Donor:
- Legal declaration of brain death
- Documented consent for VCA donation.
- ABO and HLA compatibility with the intended recipient.
- Negative crossmatch with the intended recipient (unless protocol specified exceptions are approved by immunology and the IRB).
- EBV and CMV serostatus known (CMV mismatch (donor-positive/recipient-negative (D+/R-) is not automatically exclusionary but managed by the multidisciplinary study team).
- Upper extremity anatomy suitable for transplant (no significant upper extremity trauma, major congenital anomalies, or prior upper extremity surgery that would preclude safe procurement or acceptable aesthetic/functional outcomes).
- Reasonably matched skin tone and sex, where feasible, to support psychosocial and aesthetic integration.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Anatomical or surgical factors that render transplantation unsafe or technically unfeasible (e.g., prohibitive vascular disease, prior surgeries precluding adequate anastomoses) in the judgment of the surgical team.
- Positive Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) serology (unless future evidence and institutional policy support inclusion under tightly controlled conditions).
- Active or inadequately treated serious infection, including tuberculosis, hepatitis B or C with uncontrolled viremia, or syphilis.
- Active malignancy.
- History of melanoma or other high risk, virus driven malignancies.
- Malignancy in remission <5 years, except for selected low risk, non viral cancers explicitly reviewed and approved by the transplant team.
- Must have clearance for transplant from oncology.
- Decompensated liver disease without hepatology clearance
- Decompensated or advanced cirrhosis
- Uncontrolled or uncorrectable comorbidities that substantially elevate perioperative or immunosuppressive risk despite optimization efforts (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes with end organ damage, uncontrolled hypertension, uncorrected coagulopathy).
- Current pregnancy or stated intent to become pregnant within 12 months of transplant.
- Inability or unwillingness to use effective contraception, when applicable.
- Documented pattern of poor adherence or inability to engage with follow up despite reasonable, trauma informed efforts to reduce barriers (e.g., transportation, scheduling, health literacy, financial support).
- Active psychiatric illness that currently impairs judgment, decisional capacity, or capacity to adhere to care (e.g., untreated psychosis, severe untreated depression with suicidality, impaired reality testing), as determined by the transplant psychosocial team.
- Smoking at the time of transplantation (including cigarettes, vaping, or nicotine products)
- Active substance use disorder (alcohol or drugs) without sustained remission and without adequate recovery supports, unless the multidisciplinary team determines that risk has been sufficiently mitigated.
- Persistent, unrealistic expectations about transplant outcomes that do not resolve despite structured education and counseling.
- Absence of any viable psychosocial or financial support pathway after reasonable efforts to develop one (e.g., no caregiver and no alternative formal support options, or no feasible mechanism to obtain essential medications).
- Inability to provide informed consent, even with appropriate accommodations (e.g., language services, plain language materials, decision aids), and no appropriate legally authorized representative where required.
- Any other condition or circumstance judged by the multidisciplinary transplant team and IRB to pose unacceptable risk or compromise ethical conduct of the study.
Donor:
- Positive serology for HIV, HBV, HCV, TB, or syphilis, or other identified transmissible infections per current OPTN/UNOS and PHS guidance. HTLV testing will be conducted in line with current OPTN standards for donors with potential transmissible infections that are treatable in the recipient.
- Known history of cancer, especially head/neck or hematologic malignancy.
- Permanent upper extremity tattoos or highly identifiable markings judged incompatible with the recipient's preferences or the clinical/ethical judgment of the transplant team.
- History of extremity radiation that compromises tissue viability.
- Public Health Service (PHS) increased risk donors (e.g., recent IV drug use, incarceration) will not be automatically excluded but will require case by case risk assessment, full disclosure to the recipient, and documented multidisciplinary approval.
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: N / A
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Upper Extremity Composite Allotransplantation
Upper Extremity VCA performed under a standardized CONSORT clinical protocol.
The study utilizes a longitudinal cohort design where each participant serves as their own control pre and post transplant.
|
Upper Extremity VCA, performed to treat severe facial defects.
This procedure will be performed by qualified surgeons in accordance with standard institutional surgical practices.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of participants with Allograft Survival at 60 months
Délai: Day 0 (surgery), weekly during initial hospitalization, months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and annually thereafter through Month 60
|
Allograft survival is defined as the continued presence of the transplanted upper extremity tissue with evidence of adequate vascular perfusion assessed as clinical evaluation by the surgical team.
Survival is a binary categorical variable (Success/Failure).
Failure is defined as total graft loss necessitating surgical removal (explantation).
|
Day 0 (surgery), weekly during initial hospitalization, months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and annually thereafter through Month 60
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Active Range of Motion
Délai: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
Measured in degrees for the transplanted joint (the elbow (in some occasions), the wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), and distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints).
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Muscle strength assessed using Clinical Motor Grading (MRC Scale)
Délai: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale is a standardized 0-to-5 manual muscle testing system used by clinicians to grade muscle strength and motor power.
Motor strength was graded on a scale from M0 to M5, where M0 indicates no visible muscle contraction and M5 indicates normal muscle strength against full resistance
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Carroll Upper Extremity Function Test (UEFT)
Délai: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
A validated composite score of 33 tasks used to measure overall functional capability.
Uses a 0 to 3 scale for individual task performance:0 points: Cannot complete any portion.1 point: Completes part of the test item.2
points: Completes the item slowly or clumsily.3
points: Completes the item fully and normally.Yields a cumulative score up to 99 for the dominant hand and 96 for the non-dominant hand
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT)
Délai: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
Measured in seconds to quantify manual dexterity and fine motor coordination.
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Sensory Detection Thresholds assessed using Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test
Délai: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
Evaluates light touch thresholds and protective sensation loss in hands, feet, or limbs.
Determined by the minimum size of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament perceived by the patient.
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Tactile Acuity (2PD)
Délai: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
Measured by Static Two-Point Discrimination in millimeters (mm).
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Mean score General Health Status (PROMIS-29 v2.0)
Délai: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
29-item questionnaire that measures general physical, mental, and social health-related quality of life.
Results are converted into T-scores where 50 is the average for the U.S. general population, with a standard deviation of 10.
Higher score means worse symptoms or better ability.
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Mean score Health Utility (EQ-5D-5L)
Délai: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized participant completed questionnaire that measures health-related quality of life.
It consists of consists of 5 dimensions each scored: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4= severe problems, and 5= extreme problems.
Higher scores indicated greater levels of problems across each of the five dimensions.
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Mean score LIMB-QOL Resilience, Self Care and Fine Motor
Délai: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
Evaluates resilience, self care and fine motor following major extremity injury.
Higher scores reflect a more positive outcome.
Scored on a T-score metric with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Mean score Upper Extremity Disability (QuickDASH)
Délai: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
An 11-item self-reported tool measuring upper extremity physical function and symptoms.
Scores range from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Number of participants with Opportunistic infections
Délai: Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
|
Number of participants with Opportunistic infections
|
Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
|
|
Number of participants with Malignancies
Délai: Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
|
Number of participants with Malignancies
|
Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
|
|
Number of participants with Organ toxicity
Délai: Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
|
Number of participants with Organ toxicity
|
Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
|
|
Number of participants that complete all assessments
Délai: Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
|
Number of participants that complete all assessments
|
Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
|
|
Number of participants that complete the Central Review Agreement
Délai: Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
|
Number of participants that complete the Central Review Agreement
|
Day 0 (surgery) through Month 60
|
|
Acute Rejection Incidence and Severity
Délai: Weekly for the first month, monthly for the first year, quarterly until end of study (month 60)
|
The total number of Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) episodes per patient and their severity as graded by the Banff VCA classification.
|
Weekly for the first month, monthly for the first year, quarterly until end of study (month 60)
|
|
Mean days to Reversibility of Acute Rejection
Délai: Weekly for the first month, monthly for the first year, quarterly until end of study (month 60)
|
Measured by the Time to Clinical Resolution, defined as the number of days from the initiation of anti-rejection therapy to the return of the allograft to baseline clinical appearance and/or a follow-up biopsy showing a lower Banff grade or resolution.
|
Weekly for the first month, monthly for the first year, quarterly until end of study (month 60)
|
|
Number of participants with Chronic Allograft Rejection (CLAD/CAV):
Délai: Weekly for the first month, monthly for the first year, quarterly until end of study (month 60)
|
Number of participants with Chronic Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV) or chronic skin changes as identified via protocol-driven histopathology.
|
Weekly for the first month, monthly for the first year, quarterly until end of study (month 60)
|
|
Mean Grip Strength
Délai: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
Quantified in kilograms (kg) using a calibrated hand dynamometer
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Mean Pinch Strength
Délai: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
Quantified in kilograms (kg) using a calibrated pinch gauge
|
Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Parrainer
Collaborateurs
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Bohdan Pomahac, MD, Yale University
- Chercheur principal: Vijay Gorantla, MD, PhD, FRCS, Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Estimé)
1 octobre 2027
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
1 octobre 2037
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
1 octobre 2037
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
3 septembre 2026
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
3 septembre 2026
Première publication (Réel)
9 septembre 2026
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
15 septembre 2026
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
11 septembre 2026
Dernière vérification
1 septembre 2026
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 2000042327
- HT9425-23-3-0001 (Autre subvention/numéro de financement: Department of the Army)
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
NON
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .